Skip to comments.
Republicans' Cheney Problem
Townhall.com ^
| February 20, 2007
| Bruce Bartlett
Posted on 02/20/2007 8:54:38 PM PST by Irish Rose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Have at it, folks - 2008, President Bush, Dick Cheney, the vice presidency and presidency in general.
To: Irish Rose
Interesting article. Not sure I fully agree with its conclusion however.
To: Irish Rose
3
posted on
02/20/2007 9:00:19 PM PST
by
BlueOneGolf
(The 2nd Amendment...America's ORIGINAL Homeland Security! http://www.ar15.com)
To: Irish Rose
It has fostered insularity at the White House and closed off an important avenue of influence to the president that has encouraged him to take a "go it alone" attitude, which is bad both for the country and the Republican Party.
What's the alternative, consulting al quedas ally, the democrat party?
To: Irish Rose
IIRC, Cheney lobbied hard for Paul O'Neil at Treasury. Bad move. Not a fan of tax cuts. In addition was bailed out by as CEO of Alcoa when Bill Clinton brokered a deal between Alcoa and Marc Rich to allow Alcoa to get raw materials at reasonable prices when no body else could get product period.
I believe O'Neil was an early off the record source for anti-Bush stories early in the administration.
5
posted on
02/20/2007 9:00:53 PM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
To: Irish Rose
I've been saying that Bush should ask Cheney to resign for health reasons and nominate Duncan Hunter for VP. Even if DH doesn't get ratified, the publicity will put him in tier1, and Bush manages to give the party a clear direction. It would be an appointment worth more than the supreme court.
6
posted on
02/20/2007 9:01:14 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
To: Irish Rose
7
posted on
02/20/2007 9:01:54 PM PST
by
BlueOneGolf
(The 2nd Amendment...America's ORIGINAL Homeland Security! http://www.ar15.com)
To: gov_bean_ counter
I'm pretty certain O'Neill wrote a negative book about the Bush Administration after he was fired. You're right, bad move.
8
posted on
02/20/2007 9:02:54 PM PST
by
Irish Rose
(Will work for chocolate.)
To: Irish Rose
First of all...the wackos in the USA hate Cheney more than they do Bush...
Second of all...anyone that Bush would want to be in Cheney's place wouldn't make anyone happy anyway.
Have you read the threads around here??? Bush is about as popular on FR as Hillary on most of them.
9
posted on
02/20/2007 9:03:36 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
To: Irish Rose
The whole Bush entourage needs to go.
10
posted on
02/20/2007 9:04:46 PM PST
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: Irish Rose
Usually, it has a clear frontrunner going into the processThat's just plain MSM speak trying to invent news. If there is a 'clear frontrunner' why bother to even hold the primaries?
It's not even March 2007 fer' Pete's sake.
11
posted on
02/20/2007 9:05:45 PM PST
by
quantim
(Do not underestimate the evilness of the 'soccer mom.')
To: Kevmo
Bush should ask Cheney to resignThe dems would parlay that into an admission of guiltiness regardless of reason, it would be disastrous.
12
posted on
02/20/2007 9:07:58 PM PST
by
quantim
(Do not underestimate the evilness of the 'soccer mom.')
To: Irish Rose
Republican Party has a huge problem going into 2008. Usually, it has a clear frontrunner Duncan Hunter. Problem solved. Clear enough to me. RINO's don't count.
To: quantim
I say, let them parlay. Cheney would get to go home early & get some good fishing in.
14
posted on
02/20/2007 9:09:38 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
To: Kevmo
Gloves off for a moment?
Rightly or Wrongly the last thing a candidate would want to be right now is associated very closely with the President. Weather it be Hunter or Giuliani etc., it would give them unnecessary baggage and limit there Independence.
15
posted on
02/20/2007 9:09:48 PM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: Kevmo
Wow. Now that's a thought! Not sure what the redification process is, or what else is entailed. But isn't the President pretty much in charge of who he appoints?
16
posted on
02/20/2007 9:12:52 PM PST
by
gidget7
(2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
To: spikeytx86
The last 2 years of the VP position in a 2-term administration is spent running his own agenda anyways. Hunter needs the exposure; Bush needs to be able to say he didn't leave the party in a lurch. Cheney needs a rest. We need some clarity. And the MSM needs a good reason to run some stories & sell newspapers.
17
posted on
02/20/2007 9:13:22 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
To: gidget7
The President can nominate whomever he wants, but there's some kind of ratification process in terms of a vote by the senate.
18
posted on
02/20/2007 9:14:19 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
To: spikeytx86
OK I must confess you have a point there!
19
posted on
02/20/2007 9:14:48 PM PST
by
gidget7
(2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
To: Irish Rose
It just goes to show, it's always sumpthin!
20
posted on
02/20/2007 9:15:28 PM PST
by
Bean Counter
(Reading the Columbian so that you don't have to...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson