Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heating Up Over Nothing: Some Facts About Global Warming
Associated Content ^ | February 20, 2007 | Tim Phares

Posted on 02/21/2007 8:41:11 AM PST by TBP

It is ironic that as a major cold snap sweeps the eastern and central United States, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an agency of the United Nations, has released a report warning us of global warming and insisted that it was caused primarily by human activity.

The United Nations does not have a high record of reliability. The Los Angeles Times reported when one of the UN's agencies wrote a report a few years which disagreed with conventional wisdom on second-hand smoke that the UN suppressed the report. The UN is also well known for its anti-Americanism.

Nobody denies that the climate is changing. It has been changing ever since Earth came into being. That is why there are no longer dinosaurs, mastodons, and other life forms that used to roam the planet. But over the past 100 years, the average temperature has gone up seven tenths of a degree Celsius, or about a degree Fahrenheit, most of that before 1940.

As Jonah Goldberg writes in the February 8 issue of the Los Angeles Times, "The Earth got about 0.7 degrees Celsius warmer in the 20th century while it increased its GDP by 1,800%, by one estimate." He goes on to say, "Given the option of getting another 1,800% richer in exchange for another 0.7 degrees Celsius warmer, I'd take the heat in a heartbeat." So would I.

But the Marxist Luddites of the "global warming" movement don't see it that way. They would prefer to subject the United States to the restrictions of the Kyoto protocol (which the U.S. Senate defeated 95-0 during the Clinton-Gore Administration), despite the fact that China, India, and other Third World countries are exempt and that pollution is much worse in the Third World then in the industrialized world.

In an excellent article published February 5 at the Canada Free Press website, Dr. Timothy Ball, a doctor of climatology and Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project, wrote that "Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification." He notes that 30 years ago, we were being warned about global cooling by the same interests.

That is not even taking into account the fact that the polar ice caps are melting on Mars and there is even some melting on Pluto. Now, I wonder how the human race made that happen.

Interestingly, these changes coincide with an increase in solar activity. According to scientists with the Max Planck Institute, sunspot activity is at its highest in 1000 years.

It also fails to account for the fact that there was a significant warm period in the Middle Ages (roughly 800-1300 AD) in which the Vikings farmed Greenland and wine grapes grew in Nova Scotia. This was followed by a major cooling during the Renaissance, lasting from about 1350 until about 1900. Since then, we've been in a warming cycle. Like the current warm cycle, the medieval warm period (which was warmer than today, by most reports) coincided with increased activity on the Sun. Columnist Jack Kelly of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette notes that "The Medieval Warm Period was a time (mostly) of peace and plenty; the little Ice Age (mostly) of starvation and war."

But, but, but...there's a scientific consensus, the "global warming" advocates say. Well, it was that kind of scientific consensus that got Galileo imprisoned. You can't do science by consensus. Dr. Ball writes, "Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970's global cooling became the consensus. This proves that consensus is not a scientific fact."

Besides, there isn't really all that much of a consensus. The actions of the "global warming" activists underline that fact. Note the recent controversy at the Weather Channel. Heidi Cullen, a self-proclaimed "climate expert" for the Weather Channel, called for silencing any meteorologist who questions man-made "global warming" by decertifying them. Cullen said, "It's like allowing a meteorologist to go on-air and say that hurricanes rotate clockwise and tsunamis are caused by the weather. It's not a political statement...it's just an incorrect statement." Of course, she apparently did not know that in the Southern Hemisphere, hurricanes do rotate counterclockwise. On December 17, 2006, her program, "The Climate Code," featured Grist Magazine's Dave Roberts calling for Nuremberg trials for anyone who questioned man-made "global warming." Cullen is a contributor to the IPCC report. Yet all responsible meteorologists admit that the climate goes in cycles. But that apparently doesn't matter to Cullen and her friends.

The meteorologists and climatologists who promote the alarmist theory of global warming told us that the 2006 hurricane season would be dramatically worse than the 2005 season. It was not nearly as bad. If they were that for off on a short-term projection like that, why are we supposed to take their word for it on a long-term theory such as anthropogenic global warming?

When physician-scientist-author Michael Crichton suggested that climate change theories be reviewed by double-blind studies and evidentiary standards akin to what the Food and Drug Administration uses for new medicine, he was verbally vandalized by Senator Barbara Boxer. Senators Susan Collins ("R"-Maine) and Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) have demanded that Exxon Mobil stop funding research that questions man-made global warming, something it hasn't been doing at least since 2005.

Former Vice President Al Gore cancelled an interview with a Danish newspaper (one which had been long scheduled) rather than appear with Bjorn Lonborg, a former member of Greenpeace who is a global-warming skeptic. Yet Gore remains a major stockholder in Occidental Petroleum.

Why do the advocates of the man-made warming viewpoint have to resort to these intimidation tactics if there is a scientific consensus? The answer is because there isn't.

Recently, Fred Singer and Dennis Avery wrote a book called Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years in which they show that there is evidence of 600 warmings in the last million years.

Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University, in Australia is one of a group of hundreds of climate scientists who question the man-made global warming hypothesis. Another is Canadian Professor Tim Patterson of Carleton University. He says, "There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years."

Vladimir Shaidurov of the Russian Academy of Sciences argues that the small increase in temperatures may be caused by atmospheric changes not related to human activity. He notes that until early in the 20th century, temperatures were going down. Shaidurov explains that the most common greenhouse gas is water and very small changes in the water vapor in the atmosphere can contribute to significant changes in the temperature of the Earth's surface. We have little control over the amount of water vapor.These are just a few of the hundreds of climate scientists who diverge from the theory of man-made "global warming." Yet the effort to force us to embrace extreme solutions to this problem, solutions that could damage our standard of living, continues. Are we getting all heated up over nothing?


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2007 8:41:26 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP
Hey! Don't blame us cows!

We got our own problems!

2 posted on 02/21/2007 8:43:44 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on graphic for full GW rundown


3 posted on 02/21/2007 8:48:25 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The sky is falling, the sky is falling,! Our snow cover is melting which means the warmth of the sun will now not reflect back into the atmosphere and the heat will stay here and contribute more to GW. We are doomed!


4 posted on 02/21/2007 9:06:52 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Yes, but since Al Gore was jipped out
of his Presidency, he desperately NEEDS
this doctorship of authenticity to
add to his data re Internet Invention,
authorship of Love Story, et ad nauseum!


5 posted on 02/21/2007 9:07:57 AM PST by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
as a major cold snap sweeps the eastern and central United States

See my F'n tagline you G'd'm S'nofaB'''ch.

I am talking to the author not you TBP. It just drive me freakin nuts.

6 posted on 02/21/2007 9:11:38 AM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (I don't care what side of the debate you are on: Weather is not Climate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
He notes that 30 years ago, we were being warned about global cooling by the same interests.

They were right! Just ask anyone on the East Coast!

7 posted on 02/21/2007 9:31:56 AM PST by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

actually, the sky IS falling. See the threads about asteroids coming our way...


8 posted on 02/21/2007 9:48:02 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBP
"There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years."

That's inconvenient! /s

9 posted on 02/21/2007 10:32:50 AM PST by TigersEye (Copperheads are infesting our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Tim Phares is a writer and journalist who follows political affairs, sports, and also is a spiritual counselor, teacher, and coach. He has written for numerous publications online and in print.

Education/Experience: Hiillsdale College B.A. English

Like that wasn't obvious. This article is ridiculously bad.

10 posted on 02/21/2007 10:55:21 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Just in case somebody wonders why:

In an excellent article published February 5 at the Canada Free Press website, Dr. Timothy Ball, a doctor of climatology and Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project, wrote that "Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification."

Here's some additional info on Dr. Timothy Ball:

Tim Ball

Tim Ball update

Calgary Herald Statement of Defence

11 posted on 02/21/2007 11:07:28 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
"Hey! Don't Blame Us! "

"We Got Our Own Problems! "

12 posted on 02/21/2007 12:42:58 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

What makes the article so bad? Do you disagree with what he writes?


13 posted on 02/21/2007 5:27:55 PM PST by westmichman (They cried "Peace, peace," but there is no peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Bump


14 posted on 02/21/2007 6:36:53 PM PST by A. Pole (Gore:We are the most powerful force of nature.We are changing the relationship between Earth and Sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

bookmarked


15 posted on 02/21/2007 9:03:28 PM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

The guy's a climate scientist, a doctor of climatology. He is certainly a worthy source.


16 posted on 02/21/2007 9:43:20 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

No worry bout that, the UN is going to deal with it. They are going to talk it into little bitty pieces.


17 posted on 02/22/2007 7:07:52 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: westmichman
What makes the article so bad? Do you disagree with what he writes?

It repeats whole-cloth a bunch of skeptical talking points that are misleading, erroneous, or both. One of the initial points is the warming on Mars and Pluto, which has nothing at all to do with variability of solar activity. There's a lot more.

18 posted on 02/22/2007 12:32:02 PM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The guy's a climate scientist, a doctor of climatology. He is certainly a worthy source.

I wouldn't characterize someone who has consistently presented one-sided, biased, misleading, and erroneous arguments as a "worthy source" unless it was my goal to do the same.

19 posted on 02/22/2007 1:06:44 PM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

So you'd rather take the word of some phony-baloney socialist politicians and Nazified TV performers from the Weather Channel than climate scientists? OK.


20 posted on 02/22/2007 3:08:40 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson