Skip to comments.
Ron Paul Honored as "Taxpayers' Friend" for Tenth Consecutive Year
US House of Representatives -- Texas 14th District ^
| February 21, 2002
| US House Press Releases
Posted on 02/23/2007 6:01:05 AM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
Paul Honored as "Taxpayers' Friend" for Tenth Consecutive Year
www.house.gov/paul/
February 21, 2007
Washington, DC: Congressman Ron Paul has been recognized as a top advocate for taxpayers in the U.S. Congress for the tenth year in a row, earning the nonpartisan National Taxpayers Unions annual award as a "Taxpayers Friend" for 2005. Only 30 of 435 members in the U.S. House of Representatives earned similar honors last year.
The annual NTU rating is based on critical congressional votes relating to federal tax, spending, and regulatory issues. Paul consistently ranks at or near the top of NTUs scorecard in terms of his pro-taxpayer votes.
Overall, however, Congress is slipping when it comes to serving the least-represented special interest of allAmerican taxpayers.
"If every member of Congress voted like Representative Paul, Americans could enjoy much lower taxes and less waste in government," stated NTU President John Berthoud. "Overburdened taxpayers in Texas and across the nation owe Mr. Paul a debt of gratitude for his hard work on their behalf."
"While many Members of Congress talk about reducing the size of government, Representative Paul backed up those words with votes. This award proves that he is a consistent and effective ally in our battle to restore fiscal responsibility to Washington."
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fringe; lunatic; wobbly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-182 next last
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for Pro-Life social conservatives.
- Ron Paul introduced the Sanctity of Life Act of 2005, recognizing the Personhood of every unborn baby and removing Abortion from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
- Ron Paul is rated ZERO percent by the National Abortion Rights Action League.
- Ron Paul is an original co-sponsor of the Marriage Protection Act.
- Ron Paul voted to ban Homosexual adoption in Washington DC.
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for Tax-Cutting fiscal conservatives.
- Ron Paul is ranked by Human Events as the biggest Tax Cutter in all of Congress. Paul Named #1 Tax Cutter in Congress: (Paul) is a co-sponsor
of a constitutional amendment to repeal the 16th amendment and end income, gift, and estate taxes. Regularly pushes for tax cuts. Sponsor of bills to allow tax credits for private school tuition, to permit tax deduction of college tuition, and to stop all taxation of Social Security benefits. Opposes all unconstitutional spending programs.
- Ron Paul has ranked in the 99th percentile of the National Taxpayer Union ratings every year he has been in Congress -- thus standing head and shoulders above his big government Republican rivals like gun-grabber John McCain, transvestite Rudy Giuliani, "Amnesty Sam" Brownback, Mike "Bill Clinton embodies the American Dream" Huckabee, and Pork-Barrel King Duncan Hunter.
RON PAUL is the ONLY 100% Anti-Terrorist candidate.
- The ruling government of Iraq is dominated by the psychopathic gang of murderers known as the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and the Islamic Al Dawa Party, who are the very same Islamic Terrorist Parties which bombed the US & French Embassies in Kuwait and murdered 241 United States Marines in Beirut in 1983. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, of the Al Dawa Party, was the Al Dawa bureau chief in Damascus in the 1980s and was thus heavily responsible for Al Dawa operations in Beirut, while parliament member Jamal Jafaar Mohammed of his ruling coalition is one of the "Kuwait 17", still under a Kuwaiti death sentence (in absentia) for his direct involvement in the vicious attack on the US Embassy in Kuwait! Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate calling for an immediate END to all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist thug-regime of Iraq.
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for National Defense and Foreign Affairs.
- Ron Paul voted for the National Missile Defense Act. (source)
- Ron Paul is one of only two co-sponsors of H. Res. 123, for the establishment of a Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs to "conduct a full investigation of all unresolved matters relating to any United States personnel unaccounted for from the Vietnam era, the Korean conflict, World War II, Cold War Missions, or Gulf War, including MIA's and POW's." (POW-MIA InterNetwork)
- Ron Paul supports a strengthened Coast Guard and increased port security, and increased benefits for veterans.
- Ron Paul advocates United States withdrawal from the United Nations and withdrawal from the World Trade Organization. Says Ron Paul: "We dont need CAFTA or any other international agreement to reap the economic benefits promised by CAFTA supporters, we only need to change our own harmful economic and tax policies. Let the rest of the world hurt their citizens with tariffs; if we simply reduce tariffs and taxes at home, we will attract capital and see our economy flourish." (source).
- "Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country." --U.S. President Ronald Reagan
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for the Bill of Rights.
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate on Illegal Immigration.
- Ron Paul voted for the Secure Fence Act of 2006. Amnesty for lawbreakers is not the answer, and its time to rethink birthright citizenship, Paul added. ("Paul Votes for Stronger Border Security")
- Ron Paul is a co-sponsor of HR 487, which "expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a NAFTA superhighway or enter into any plans to create a North American Union between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico."
- "We need to allocate far more resources, both in terms of money and manpower, to securing our borders and coastlines here at home. This is the most critical task before us, both in terms of immigration problems and the threat of foreign terrorists. Unless and until we secure our borders, illegal immigration and the problems associated with it will only increase." Ron Paul (source)
RON PAUL is the ONLY socially-conservative Candidate defending the independence of the Christian Church against Federal "Faith-Based Socialism".
- "Government funding of religious organizations will transform them into adjuncts of the federal welfare state, more concerned about obeying federal rules and regulations than fulfilling the obligations of their faith." Ron Paul (source). Every other so-called "social conservative" candidate actually FAVORS this underhanded Orwellian Federal assault on the Freedom of the Christian Church.
"I got to know President Reagan in 1976 when, as a freshman congressman, I was one of only four members of that body to endorse then-Governor Reagans primary challenge to President Gerald Ford. I had the privilege of serving as the leader of President Reagans Texas delegation at the Republican convention of 1976, where Ronald Reagan almost defeated an incumbent president for his partys nomination. I was one of the millions attracted to Ronald Reagan by his strong support for limited government and the free-market. I felt affinity for a politician who based his conservative philosophy on '...a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom.' I wish more of todays conservative leaders based their philosophy on a desire for less government and more freedom." Ron Paul, Remembering Ronald Reagan
 |
In 2008, I'm voting for the REAGAN REPUBLICAN. I'm voting for former Vietnam Combat Flight Surgeon, and Leader of Ronald Reagan's Electoral Delegation from Texas: In 2008, I'm Voting for RON PAUL!
|
 |
To: Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; Extremely Extreme Extremist; KoRn; traviskicks; ...
Great Ron Paul List Ping
 |
In 2008, I'm voting for the REAGAN REPUBLICAN. I'm voting for former Vietnam Combat Flight Surgeon, and Leader of Ronald Reagan's Electoral Delegation from Texas: In 2008, I'm Voting for RON PAUL!
|
 |
2
posted on
02/23/2007 6:02:06 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: All
Forum-Post or FReepMail me with requests to be added to the GRPPL (Great Ron Paul Ping List)
3
posted on
02/23/2007 6:05:21 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I like Ron Paul but I think he's seriously wrong on the war in Iraq.
5
posted on
02/23/2007 6:06:39 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: cripplecreek
Ron Paul is living proof that you can be a principled conservative and still disagree with the Administration's policies.
6
posted on
02/23/2007 6:11:35 AM PST
by
Wormwood
(Your Friendly Neighborhood Moderate)
To: cripplecreek
The government of Iraq is guilty of willfully and knowingly harboring self-confessed, and at least one
Convicted, Anti-American Islamic Terrorists
in their Ruling Majority Coalition.
"So long as training camps operate, so long as nations harbor terrorists, freedom is at risk. And America and our allies must not, and will not, allow it." -- President George W. Bush, 2002 State of the Union
Ron Paul is Right to demand that we end all Military and Financial support to Governments that knowingly and willfully harbor self-confessed and convisted International Terrorists. And he is the ONLY Republican Candidate standing consistently for this principle.
Best, OP
7
posted on
02/23/2007 6:12:32 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Correction -- "Governments that knowingly and willfully harbor self-confessed and conviCted International Terrorists" etc.
8
posted on
02/23/2007 6:14:10 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: Wormwood
Would you like to be added to the Ron Paul ping list?
9
posted on
02/23/2007 6:15:21 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: Wormwood
You realize, of course, that for many the you can only be a principled conservative IF you agree with the Administration's policies.
10
posted on
02/23/2007 6:15:46 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
11
posted on
02/23/2007 6:15:53 AM PST
by
Wormwood
(Your Friendly Neighborhood Moderate)
To: Wormwood
You're quite welcome. I will ping you to future Ron Paul articles and alert you to Ron Paul campaign information for your State as it becomes available.
Best, OP
12
posted on
02/23/2007 6:18:39 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: Wolfie
Nice to see you again. Shall I go ahead and put you on the Ron Paul list also? (I figure you'll check in whether I do or not, so I just figgered...)
13
posted on
02/23/2007 6:22:04 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: Wolfie
Oh of course.
The idea that anyone who disagrees with Bush's handling of Iraq is automatically shouted down as a traitor is shameful.
14
posted on
02/23/2007 6:22:22 AM PST
by
Wormwood
(Your Friendly Neighborhood Moderate)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Absolutely, add me to the list. Thanks.
15
posted on
02/23/2007 6:24:18 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Wormwood
Ron Paul is living proof that you can be a principled conservative and still disagree with the Administration's policies. In a lot of areas, you can't be a principled conservative unless you disagree with the Administration's policies....
16
posted on
02/23/2007 6:25:38 AM PST
by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Thanks Ron!
Too bad your too much of a stud for the CINOs at freerepublic.com
17
posted on
02/23/2007 6:26:00 AM PST
by
Verax
(""Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated - Planned Parenthood President,")
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul is a cut and run coward. He turned his back on the troops. When the going got tough, Ron left the troops without his support. Shameful. Ron Paul voted against the Iraq War Resolution authorizing force be used against Saddam. If Ronny the coward had his way, Saddam would stil be in power today to murder and rape the innocent. That is Ron Paul.
18
posted on
02/23/2007 6:28:24 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: Verax; steve-b
Shall I add you gentlemen to the Ron Paul supporter ping list?
I'll provide the Ron Paul article pings and campaign info for your State primaries as it becomes available. The "support" part is up to you!
Best, OP
19
posted on
02/23/2007 6:30:09 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: Wolfie; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Absolutely, add me to the list. Thanks.Ditto that for me as well please.
20
posted on
02/23/2007 6:30:36 AM PST
by
Bigun
(IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
21
posted on
02/23/2007 6:31:23 AM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: jrooney
If Ronny the coward Let me just try to get your line of thinking down: Anyone who doesn't think that US should run around being the worlds policeman is a coward? Does that mean we are coward if after Iraq we don't attack North Korea, Cuba, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Syria?
22
posted on
02/23/2007 6:33:53 AM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Is this the same Ron Paul that voted with the traitorous donks, the party of jackasses, against the surge that is working? Yes it is! He is No Ronald Reagan! He is not worthy to shine the boots of our troops.
23
posted on
02/23/2007 6:34:23 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: jrooney
If Ron Paul voted *against* the use of force resolution, then how can he be a "cut and run coward"?
Paul's position was that we not invade in the first place.
24
posted on
02/23/2007 6:38:06 AM PST
by
Wormwood
(Your Friendly Neighborhood Moderate)
To: Wormwood
He was a coward then and wants to cut and run now. Does that not make him a cut and run coward? Yes it does. 1 plus 1 = 2 for the simple minded.
25
posted on
02/23/2007 6:39:27 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: jrooney
Ron Paul called for a
Constitutional Congressional Declaration of War before sending Troops into Iraq.
Paul Calls for Congressional Declaration of War with Iraq
That was the Constitutional way to do it.
As a result of Congress' abdication of its responsibility to Constitutionally Declare War in Iraq, our Troops who are kidnapped by the Enemy there are denied "Prisoner of War" status.
Sadly, another member of the American Military is now ambiguously classified as "Missing-Captured" when his true status is Prisoner of War. Why is the United States Government so unwilling to refer to these servicemen as Prisoner of War? From our observation, the answer is simple. The ambiguous designation "Missing-Captured" allows a public with a notoriously short attention span to forget that these men were taken alive and held by the enemy. The "Missing-Captured" designation is a question mark in the minds of a generally unaware public. There is no question mark attached to the designation Prisoner of War. It is a clear description of status.... Unfortunately, the United States Government has never had any difficulty leaving any man behind. The elimination of the POW designation makes it that much easier. The perception foisted on an unsuspecting public that there are no POWs in Iraq is simply wrong. -- POW/MIA InterNetwork, January 27, 2007 (http://www.aiipowmia.com/inter27/in270107bitsnaf.html)
Ron Paul is the ONLY Republican Candidate standing up for our missing Prisoners of War! "Ron Paul is one of only two co-sponsors of H. Res. 123, for the establishment of a Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs to 'conduct a full investigation of all unresolved matters relating to any United States personnel unaccounted for from the Vietnam era, the Korean conflict, World War II, Cold War Missions, or Gulf War, including MIA's and POW's.' (POW-MIA InterNetwork)"
 |
Bring 'em home alive, Ron! POW*MIA -- You Are Not Forgotten |
26
posted on
02/23/2007 6:41:39 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: jrooney
If Ronny the coward had his way, Saddam would still be in power today to murder and rape the innocent
But Ron Paul's been consistent on Iraq...he voted against the initial authorization, condemned his fellow Conressmen for refusing to take a stand on declaring war as it is required to do under the Constitution
Two weeks ago, during a hearing in the House International Relations committee, I attempted to force the committee to follow the Constitution and vote to declare war with Iraq. The language of Article I, section 8, is quite clear: only Congress has the authority to declare war. Yet Congress in general, and the committee in particular, have done everything possible to avoid making such a declaration. Why? Because members lack the political courage to call an invasion of Iraq what it really is- a war- and vote yes or no on the wisdom of such a war. Congress would rather give up its most important authorized power to the President and the UN than risk losing an election later if the war goes badly. There is always congressional "support" for a popular war, but the politicians want room to maneuver if the public later changes its mind. So members take half steps, supporting confusingly worded "authorizations" that they can back away from easily if necessary.
When Congress issued clear declarations of war against Japan and Germany during World War II, the nation was committed and victory was achieved. When Congress shirks its duty and avoids declaring war, as with Korea, and Vietnam, the nation is less committed and victory is elusive. No lives should be lost in Iraq unless Congress expresses the clear will of the American people and votes yes or no on a declaration of war.
--Ron Paul, October 14, 2002
As far as rescuing Iraqis who were murdered by Saddam...I frankly care more about the thousands of young Americans who've been wounded or killed while standing in the middle of the barbarian battles between Shiites and Sunnis...and, in the end, we got rid of Saddam, who was a mortal enemy of Iran and now have a pro-Iranian government in Iraq...we've spent so much to accomplish so little...as government always seems to do
We Americans must avoid fantastic schemes to rescue those for whom we bear no responsibility, and we must resist imagining a moral splendor for murderers who better understand media manipulation than the murderers with whom they are in conflict. We must learn not to trust our eyes and ears--and, especially, their electronic extensions: the media, forever focusing on the crisis of the moment, almost never understand what they witness. In dealing with nationalism and fundamentalism, we must be willing to let the flames burn themselves out whenever we are not in danger of catching fire ourselves. If we want to avoid needless, thankless deaths among our own countrymen, we must try to learn to watch others die with equanimity.
--Col. Ralph Peters
27
posted on
02/23/2007 6:42:13 AM PST
by
Irontank
(Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
To: jrooney
I see. Conservative ideological consistency is only laudable if it does not interfere with Bush foreign policy.
Thanks for the clarification.
28
posted on
02/23/2007 6:42:34 AM PST
by
Wormwood
(Your Friendly Neighborhood Moderate)
To: jrooney
Ron Paul did not "turn his back on the troops". He was consistantly against the war.
Ron is too isolationist to be President, but it is false to accuse him of turning his back on our troops.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Like I said the other day when you were cheerleading for Ron Paul, it does not matter what you say but how you vote! Talk is cheap, action is what matters. What good is it if we have 435 people in the house that just talk? It matters how they vote!
30
posted on
02/23/2007 6:44:53 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Is this:
>>>The ruling government of Iraq is dominated by the psychopathic gang of murderers known as the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and the Islamic Al Dawa Party, who are the very same Islamic Terrorist Parties which bombed the US & French Embassies in Kuwait and murdered 241 United States Marines in Beirut in 1983. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, of the Al Dawa Party, was the Al Dawa bureau chief in Damascus in the 1980s and was thus heavily responsible for Al Dawa operations in Beirut, while parliament member Jamal Jafaar Mohammed of his ruling coalition is one of the "Kuwait 17", still under a Kuwaiti death sentence (in absentia) for his direct involvement in the vicious attack on the US Embassy in Kuwait! Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate calling for an immediate END to all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist thug-regime of Iraq.<<<<<
Sourced by you or Ron Paul?
31
posted on
02/23/2007 6:45:54 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: CharlesWayneCT
Voting against the surge to send reinforcements to help our soldiers sure as hell was not assisting them. Therefore, if he did not assist, he turned his back on them.
32
posted on
02/23/2007 6:46:48 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: Calpernia
I sourced all the links. I am not on Ron Paul's staff.
33
posted on
02/23/2007 6:48:10 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: Calpernia
Calpernia
That is all true...Jamal Jafaar Mohammed, who today sits in the Iraqi Parliament, was sentenced to death in Kuwait for the bombing of the US Embassy there...now, being a member of the new Iraqi government, he has immunity
34
posted on
02/23/2007 6:48:59 AM PST
by
Irontank
(Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
To: jrooney
Like I said the other day when you were cheerleading for Ron Paul, it does not matter what you say but how you vote! Talk is cheap, action is what matters. What good is it if we have 435 people in the house that just talk? It matters how they vote!...And by failing to Vote on a Constitutional Declaration of War, (as Ron Paul demanded before any Troops be committed to Iraq) Congress has left our kidnapped Troops in Iraq without the protection of Prisoner of War status.
Ron Paul is the ONLY Republican Candidate standing up for our missing Prisoners of War!
"Ron Paul is one of only two co-sponsors of H. Res. 123, for the establishment of a Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs to 'conduct a full investigation of all unresolved matters relating to any United States personnel unaccounted for from the Vietnam era, the Korean conflict, World War II, Cold War Missions, or Gulf War, including MIA's and POW's.'" (POW-MIA InterNetwork)
 |
Bring 'em home alive, Ron! POW*MIA -- You Are Not Forgotten |
35
posted on
02/23/2007 6:50:53 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul is a giant among pygmies in D.C.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Are you aware the source you linked, Global Americana Institute, receives funds from a MoveOn.org entity, PAX AMERICANA?
37
posted on
02/23/2007 6:52:32 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Irontank; Calpernia
now, being a member of the new Iraqi government, he has immunityNot true. He could be removed by a majority "No Confidence" vote according to the Iraqi Constitution.
His "immunity" amounts to the fact that the Iraqi Government hasn't voted to remove and extradite this Convicted International Terrorist.
38
posted on
02/23/2007 6:52:34 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: jrooney
Voting against the surge to send reinforcements to help our soldiers sure as hell was not assisting them
The surge isn't going to help either...the Administration should have no credibility left on the issue of Iraq...every prediction they've made has proven terribly wrong. The only thing that would assist our troops now is to get them out of that hellhole. Saudi Arabia is threatening to go into Iraq to protect the Sunnis from Iranian-backed Shiite death squads? Good...let them. Let all of the middle eastern barbarians kill each other. Let's just make sure none of our fellow Americans are in the middle of it
39
posted on
02/23/2007 6:53:01 AM PST
by
Irontank
(Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Shall I add you gentlemen to the Ron Paul supporter ping list? OK.
40
posted on
02/23/2007 6:54:44 AM PST
by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: jrooney
Ron Paul is a cut and run coward. He turned his back on the troops. When the going got tough, Ron left the troops without his support. Shameful. Ron Paul voted against the Iraq War Resolution authorizing force be used against Saddam. If Ronny the coward had his way, Saddam would stil be in power today to murder and rape the innocent. This is a thread about Paul's exemplqary record on taxes. Would you care to add your thoughts on that?
41
posted on
02/23/2007 6:55:22 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Rudy Giuliani as the Republican nominee is like Martin Luther being Pope.)
To: Calpernia
Read all the posts here - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1787992/posts
All his information comes from left wing sources about the Iraq war. Why would a supposed conservative do that?
42
posted on
02/23/2007 6:55:36 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: Calpernia
Are you aware the source you linked, Global Americana Institute, receives funds from a MoveOn.org entity, PAX AMERICANA?I wasn't aware of that; but the identity of convicted Terrorist Jamal Jafaar Mohammed, as well as Al Dawa's role in various anti-American terrorist attacks, has been reported in numerous international news outlets.
If you think it important, I'll go ahead and re-source some of the links for my next Posting.
43
posted on
02/23/2007 6:55:39 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: jmc813
He has a great record on taxes, so does GW. Same posters here that praise Ron for his taxes, don't GW. Why is that? Are lower taxes going to keep you alive? No. BTW, there are links provided by the poster about the Iraq war, thus makes this a thread about that too.
44
posted on
02/23/2007 6:57:48 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: Wormwood
I see. Conservative ideological consistency is only laudable if it does not interfere with Bush foreign policy.It is an interesting exercise in futility to keep asking the Paul haters if there are any domestic policies in which they disagree with Paul on. They simply ignore your question and ramble on about his Iraq stances.
45
posted on
02/23/2007 6:58:00 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Rudy Giuliani as the Republican nominee is like Martin Luther being Pope.)
To: jrooney; Calpernia
All his information comes from left wing sources about the Iraq war. Why would a supposed conservative do that?You find one or two sources you consider objectionable, and suddenly it's "All" my information?
Now you're just telling blatant lies, and you know it.
The identity of convicted Terrorist Jamal Jafaar Mohammed, as well as Al Dawa's role in various anti-American terrorist attacks, has been reported in numerous international news outlets. Since it will deprive you of such sleazy lies, I'll go ahead and re-source my links for my next Posting.
46
posted on
02/23/2007 6:58:36 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
>>>If you think it important, I'll go ahead and re-source some of the links for my next Posting.
Left wing propaganda postings are very important. To be weeded out, that is.
47
posted on
02/23/2007 6:58:54 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: jrooney
All his information comes from left wing sources about the Iraq war. Why would a supposed conservative do that?
Because those on the left and right are opoosed to this war...granted...there are a lot of leftist, hate-America types in the anti-war camp...but, certainly not all of us.
Someone once posted on here that the anti-war left was anti-war because they believe the rest of the world is too good for America...the anti-war right is anti-war because we believe America is too good for the rest of the world...and I think there is a lot of truth in that
48
posted on
02/23/2007 7:00:19 AM PST
by
Irontank
(Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
How does one get nominated to Select Committees? (I honestly don't know). Are they appointed? Volunteer? Voted?
49
posted on
02/23/2007 7:00:57 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Irontank
What are your views on Ronald Reagan, since his image is posted abovve next to Ron Paul's? He sure as hell was no isolationist.
50
posted on
02/23/2007 7:01:54 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-182 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson