Looks like "exit stage left" for JZ, sponsors can't cut him loose fast enough.
Always think before you blog...
1 posted on
02/24/2007 5:18:54 PM PST by
xsrdx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: xsrdx
I think the use of nukes would be more appropriate.
2 posted on
02/24/2007 5:21:21 PM PST by
U S Army EOD
(Support your local EOD Detachment)
To: xsrdx
And this is Ted Nugent's post to the people coming down on Zumbo at Nugents Blog...
...if you don't accept his apology, get the hell away from my campfire..."
A sad day it is...
3 posted on
02/24/2007 5:22:15 PM PST by
sit-rep
( http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
To: xsrdx
Quick, where's the Clinton crocodile tear video clip?
To: xsrdx
They do not want American gun owners to make a distinction between assault weapons and traditional hunting guns such as shotguns and rifles. If they did, a rift could emerge between hunters, who tend to have the most money for political contributions to gun rights causes, and assault-weapon owners, who tend to have lots of passion but less cash. Huh?????
5 posted on
02/24/2007 5:22:59 PM PST by
digger48
To: xsrdx
Zumbo said some inane stuff and rightfully paid a price.
Al Franken's signature is on the papers by which AirAmerica ripped off a childrens' charity -- and now he's running for public office.
To: xsrdx
The reaction -- from tens of thousands of owners of assault rifles across the country, from media and manufacturers rooted in the gun business, and from the National Rifle Association -- has been swift, severe and unforgiving. Despite a profuse public apology and a vow to go hunting soon with an assault weapon, Zumbo's career appears to be over. Have you EVER read a more slanted summary of the whole incident?
His apology was halfhearted AT BEST. Frankly, I do cringe when I think of the reaction, the idea that his whole career is over. But... I think the guy was WAYYYY out of line and part of the rules of doing stupid things and being wrong is you don't get to control the consequences.
7 posted on
02/24/2007 5:24:36 PM PST by
Terriergal
(All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
To: xsrdx
Good.
Zumbo deserved all he received.
We now face that worst onslaught in the history of civilization against the rights of freemen to bear arms and the final bulwark against tyrants.
We are alone.
We will make, or break, history.
Like denizens of the Titanic, Zumbo is a fool that lived in his gilded cage and thought it to be the world.
8 posted on
02/24/2007 5:26:23 PM PST by
WorkingClassFilth
("Don't tread on me" - the motto of Patriots. "May I lick your boots?" - the motto of RINOs.)
To: xsrdx
A very slanted article, that misses the whole reason for the anger against Zumbo.
Like a lot of hunters, he thinks the Second Amendment is about hunting. It's not.
Even in his "apology", he demonstrated that he still doesn't understand that basic fact.
Plus, there is no viable or reasonable distinction between so-called "assault weapons" (which aren't assault weapons at all - an assault weapon is a small-caliber, select fire lightweight rifle for use by paratroopers/special forces) and "ordinary" rifles. The distinctions as drawn in the law are cosmetic only.
So the real problem is that this man, despite his long career on the hunting side, has demonstrated that he still doesn't get it.
9 posted on
02/24/2007 5:26:28 PM PST by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: xsrdx
Typical lefty article.
Sorry Zumbo. Have a good retirement.
The second amendment has nothing to do with hunting.
10 posted on
02/24/2007 5:30:24 PM PST by
Poser
(Willing to fight for oil)
To: xsrdx
Mr. Zumbo and msnbc seem to be under the delusion, as many of the unwashed masses are, that the 2nd Amendment is about hunting.
12 posted on
02/24/2007 5:33:02 PM PST by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: xsrdx
"They do not want American gun owners to make a distinction between assault weapons and traditional hunting guns such as shotguns and rifles. If they did, a rift could emerge between hunters, who tend to have the most money for political contributions to gun rights causes, and assault-weapon owners, who tend to have lots of passion but less cash."
What a pant load. Ever see what the typical collector/enthusiast lays out in a year on his hobby? Thought not.
15 posted on
02/24/2007 5:33:38 PM PST by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: xsrdx
"He apologized all over himself, and it didn't do any good." I think it was the word "terrorist". I don't think a prairie dog distinguishes between a .223 fired from an AR or from something Zumbo approves of.
As others have noted, the 2nd Ammendment isn't about hunting. You'd think a guy who spent his life writing about firearms would know that.
He's got the same problem that some well known entertainers are discovering. You have the right to insult me. You don't have the right to insult me with no consequences. There are actors whose movies I no longer watch, singers whose records I no longer buy, and writers I don't read. Its not a boycott, I just don't like them enough to spend my money on their products any more.
18 posted on
02/24/2007 5:34:49 PM PST by
marron
To: xsrdx
I would not be surprised to hear, in a few weeks, after the immediate hoopla has died down, that Zumbo has been hired as an advisor/writer for a publication with anti-gun ties, which will then use him as a propaganda-front as exemplifying "the true face of reasonable gun owners" or some such. Or, George Soros might just hire him directly.
My point is, don't worry over his lost "career". The left will take good care of him now - he is far too valuable and useful to them to let this opportunity pass.
27 posted on
02/24/2007 5:43:26 PM PST by
tarheelswamprat
(So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
To: xsrdx
Jim Zumbo is now world famous:
Australia: Blog Entry Ruins Outdoorsmans Career
In regards to the above Washington Post article, the author is as ignorant about firearms, and the Second Amendment, as Jim Zumbo.
The reaction -- from tens of thousands of owners of assault rifles
Wrong. Assault rifles are selective-fire. The reaction came from owners of semi-automatic rifles. Big difference.
I notice the author, Blaine Harden, also uses the terms "assault weapon" and "assault-style firearms" in his article.
Obviously, Mr. Harden has been drinking the Brady Campaign Kool-Aid.
28 posted on
02/24/2007 5:43:29 PM PST by
holymoly
(Molon Labe)
To: xsrdx
Zumbo: Never bite the hand that feeds you.
Ya idiot.
34 posted on
02/24/2007 5:49:08 PM PST by
Thumper1960
(Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
To: xsrdx
Zumbo went so far as to call scary-looking guns "terrorist rifles". This is part of the agitprop blitz for the upcoming AWB part II. Now we have his scalp, and there will be more.
At the time of the first AWB, in 1994:
To: xsrdx
Hunting prairie dogs with assault weapons? How is that a sport?
39 posted on
02/24/2007 5:55:59 PM PST by
Krankor
(kROGER)
To: xsrdx
"America's gun culture" they use that phrase like guns are just something Americans treat like Baseball. You don't have to even own a gun to understand that there wouldn't be an America without guns.
41 posted on
02/24/2007 5:58:18 PM PST by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: xsrdx
It all happened in the past week, after he publicly criticized the use of military-style assault rifles by hunters, especially those gunning for prairie dogs.Getting a buck with an open-sight SKS is far more "sport" than with some "magnum" shell through a high-powered scope.
46 posted on
02/24/2007 6:01:06 PM PST by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: xsrdx
49 posted on
02/24/2007 6:02:28 PM PST by
Pro-Bush
(hater)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson