Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scorn poured on Director's 'Coffin of Christ' theory (James Cameron-Archeologists/Scholars Dispute)
Evening Standard ^ | 02/25/2007

Posted on 02/26/2007 2:03:46 PM PST by SirLinksalot

Scorn poured on James Cameron's 'coffin of Christ' theory

Archaeologists and biblical scholars have poured scorn on a Hollywood film director's sensational claim that he has discovered the coffin of Jesus Christ.

Oscar-winning 'Titanic' director James Cameron's assertion that the bones of Jesus and his family were hidden for centuries in a Jerusalem tomb caused an outcry in the Holy Land.

Even a British archeologist who worked with Cameron, Dr. Shimon Gibson, admitted he's "sceptical" about the claims that challenge some of the central tenets of Christianity.

The very fact that Jesus had a grave would contradict the Christian belief that he was resurrected and ascended to heaven.

'The Lost Tomb of Christ', a documentary set to air on Channel Four next month, argues that ten ancient ossuaries, small caskets used to store bones, which were found when bulldozers flattened a Jerusalem suburb in 1980, may have contained the remains of Jesus and his wife and child.

One of the caskets even bears the title, 'Judah, son of Jesus,' which Cameron claims as evidence that Jesus may have had a son. Another coffin was said to hold the bones of Mary Magdalene, also known as 'Mariamne'.

Cameron unveiled two of the small limestone caskets at a press conference in New York, but the director could offer little proof to support his claims, other than the mathematical probability of a tomb containing a set of ossuaries with names linked to Jesus.

Of the ten ossuaries found, six were inscribed with the names of Jesus, Mary, Joseph and Mary Magdalene, as well as Judah, Son of Jesus, and a Matthew, of which there were many in Mary's family, according to Luke 3:23.

Critics said all the names were commonplace in Biblical times.

Apparently surprised at the hostility over his 'discovery', the director who famously claimed to be 'the king of the world' when he won an Oscar for Titanic, insisted it was not a publicity stunt and said his critics should wait and see the film.

"I'm not a theologist. I'm not an archaeologist. I'm a documentary filmmaker," he said.

Dr. Gibson, who was one of the first people to examine the caskets 27 years ago, now says: "Entering the tomb in 1980 I didn't imagine this would become such an international focus.

"These are typical stone caskets from the first century. There are a lot of aspects that need to be looked at. A lot of new research has to be done. I'm sceptical."

Even Cameron, pushed to support his claims, said statisticians found "in the range of a couple of million to one in favor of it being them."

Most Christians believe Jesus' body spent three days at the site of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem's Old City. The burial site identified in Cameron's documentary is in a southern Jerusalem neighborhood nowhere near the church.

Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television.

"They just want to get money for it," Kloner said. "It was an ordinary middle-class Jerusalem burial cave," he added. "The names on the caskets are the most common names found among Jews at the time."

"The historical, religious and archaeological evidence show that the place where Christ was buried is the Church of the Resurrection," said Attallah Hana, a Greek Orthodox clergyman in Jerusalem.

Stephen Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem who was interviewed in the documentary, said the film's hypothesis holds little weight.

"I don't think that Christians are going to buy into this," he said. "But sceptics, in general, would like to see something that pokes holes into the story that so many people hold dear."

"How possible is it?" he added. "On a scale of one through ten, with ten being completely possible, it's probably a one, maybe a one and a half."

Pfann is even unsure that the name Jesus on the caskets was read correctly. He thinks it is more likely the name Hanun. Ancient Semitic script is notoriously difficult to decipher.

Cameron spent two years working with a team of experts to make the controversial film. Director Simcha Jacobovici told the press conference: "For millions of readers, the Da Vinci Code was a fantasy, a fiction. Here is a Judah, son of Jesus, next to a Jesus and a Mariamne."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cameron; coffin; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; jamescameron; jamesossuary; jerusalem; jesus; jesuscoffin; jesustomb; letshavejerusalem; simchajacobovici; talpiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2007 2:03:49 PM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

See also here :

Scholars Criticize New Jesus Documentary

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/26/D8NHFDRG3.html


2 posted on 02/26/2007 2:05:52 PM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chani

for later consumption


3 posted on 02/26/2007 2:06:08 PM PST by Chani (Happy cows make good cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

My name is John. I am in no way (that I know of) descended from the apostle or saint of the same name.


4 posted on 02/26/2007 2:07:23 PM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
"I don't think that Christians are going to buy into this," he said.

Oh really? Would they be a Christian if they did?

5 posted on 02/26/2007 2:07:47 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
"I'm not a theologist. I'm not an archaeologist. I'm a documentary filmmaker," he said.

That doesn't look like the correct quote.

"I'm not a theologist. I'm not an archaeologist. I'm a documentary filmmaker, BS artist" he said.

There now it looks right.

6 posted on 02/26/2007 2:08:27 PM PST by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

They keep trying, trying, trying and keep failing, failing, failing.


7 posted on 02/26/2007 2:11:20 PM PST by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

"documentary filmmaker"

Let's see, we have Albore, Michael Moore-on...... yeah, the reputation of a "documentary filmmaker" for factual accuracy and dedicated scholarship is at an all-time high right now.


8 posted on 02/26/2007 2:14:59 PM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Another coffin was said to hold the bones of Mary Magdalene, also known as 'Mariamne'.

Known to who as Mariamne, first I've ever heard that claim.

9 posted on 02/26/2007 2:15:44 PM PST by Valpal1 (Social vs fiscal conservtism? Sorry, I'm not voting my wallet over the broken bodies of the innocent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6

See comments here :

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/009269.php#comments

Jesus Buried In Plain Sight?

Many people have discussed the supposed discovery of the family tomb of Jesus in a section of Jerusalem. The finding, which forms the basis of a Discovery Channel special next Sunday, purports to show that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had a son named Judah, also buried at the tomb with his own ossuary:

New scientific evidence, including DNA analysis conducted at one of the world's foremost molecular genetics laboratories, as well as studies by leading scholars, suggests a 2,000-year-old Jerusalem tomb could have once held the remains of Jesus of Nazareth and his family.
The findings also suggest that Jesus and Mary Magdalene might have produced a son named Judah.

The DNA findings, alongside statistical conclusions made about the artifacts — originally excavated in 1980 — open a potentially significant chapter in Biblical archaeological history.


Well, maybe. The DNA analysis, which has been trumpeted without much explanation, does not identify the Jesus of the ossuary as the same Jesus in the Bible. All it does is show that the bones in a tomb that the researchers speculate belonged to Mary Magdelene have no familial relation to the bones in the Jesus ossuary. That is how the archeologists assumed that the two in this crypt were married, and that the Judah ben-Jesus of the ossuary had to be their offspring.

This shows why pop science rarely delivers anything but entertainment. I enjoy Simcha Jacobovici in his incarnation as "The Naked Archeologist", but I don't pretend that the show is anything more than a superficial and oversimplified trek through history. The speculations made by the team working on the Talpiot tomb show how a series of assumptions can lead to a wild and likely incorrect conclusion.

Let's take a few things in the context of the times. Jesus was a well-known agitator whose crucifixion creates a cult following, in the eyes of the Romans and the leading Jews of the time. The basis of that cult formed around the notion that Jesus rose from the dead. If the Romans knew where his body was buried, why then did they not produce it as proof of his immutable death? In order to be placed in an ossuary, he would have to lie in the tomb for a year, decomposing to skeletal remains. During that time, the Romans could easily have produced the body -- or the cult followers could have stolen it and buried it elsewhere to prevent it.

The familial ties also seem rather odd. In the first generation of Jesus, no one mentions his marriage or family. Yet his familiy and followers -- ossuaries of Matthew and James are supposedly among the discoveries -- supposedly felt it of no moment to bury him with his wife and son, despite their refusal to acknowledge a marriage. By the time his son would have died, the Gospels would already have been written and prophesied in the region and further to Greece and Rome.

And all of this evidence would have been left in the open, in a tomb in the middle of the largest city in the region, where anyone could have discovered it.

I'm sorry, but this relies on faith at least as much as the Christian religion does, and contradicts common sense. It's nonsense. None of this makes any sense at all, but I'll bet it sells lots of advertising. (h/t: CQ reader Peyton R)


10 posted on 02/26/2007 2:16:17 PM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chani

Here's another Catholic take on the issue :

http://theanchoressonline.com/2007/02/23/we-must-be-getting-close-to-easter/


11 posted on 02/26/2007 2:17:30 PM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

How would you know, even if you were?


12 posted on 02/26/2007 2:18:11 PM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Cameron wouldn't be the first to fall victim to a long history antiquities hoaxes in the Holy Land:

http://www.pcusa.org/pcnews/2005/05065.htm


13 posted on 02/26/2007 2:19:36 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Jesus and his family were from Nazareth. Why would they all be buried in J'lem?

They can never find anything related to an earthly burial of Jesus Christ, because he wasn't buried...
14 posted on 02/26/2007 2:20:44 PM PST by vrwinger (You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

How about a documentary about the life of Mohammed?


15 posted on 02/26/2007 2:20:47 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
How would you know, even if you were?

Doesn't matter if I hire the right PR man and publicist.
16 posted on 02/26/2007 2:21:42 PM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

As before, my lawnboy is Jesus. His mother is Maria. She sells tamales. His dad is Jose.

I suppose when they die, James Cameron, Jr. will point to their graves and say, "Hey look, it's proof of my dad's theory. And this time, there are bones!"


17 posted on 02/26/2007 2:24:11 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vrwinger


An interesting rebuttal :

http://www.str.org/site/PageServer?pagename=blog_a

Who's Writing the Ficiton Here?

As I mentioned yesterday, the claims about the remains of Jesus immediately put me in mind of Dr. Paul L. Maier's work of fiction A Skeleton in God's Closet. That was the premise of the mystery. So Dr. Maier has thought about this idea and he's also an expert in ancient archaeology and follows these developments closely. Here is his response to the news so far:

Paul L. Maier, Ph.D., Litt.D
Department of History
Western Michigan University
Kalamazoo, MI 49008

February 25, 2007

Dear Friends and Readers,

Thanks for the profusion of e-mails I’ve received over the last two days regarding the Talpiot tombs discovery in Jerusalem, a.k.a., “the Jesus Family Tomb” story. Some of you also suggested that “life seemed to be following art” so far as my A Skeleton in God’s Closet was concerned. Believe me, this is not the way I wanted my novel to hit the visual media!

Alas, this whole affair is just the latest in the long-running media attack on the historical Jesus, which – we thought – had culminated in that book of lies, The Da Vinci Code. But no: the caricatures of Christ continue.

Please, lose no sleep over the Talpiot “discoveries” for the following reasons, and here are the facts:.

1) Nothing is new here: scholars have known about the ossuaries ever since March of 1980. The general public learned when the BBC filmed a documentary on them in 1996. James Tabor’s book, The Jesus Dynasty, also made a big fuss over the Talpiot tombs more recently, and now James Cameron (The Titanic) and Simcha Jacobovici have climbed aboard the sensationalist bandwagon as well. He

2) All the names – Yeshua, Joseph, Maria, Mariamene, Matia, Judah, and Jose -- are extremely frequent Jewish names for that time and place, and thus most schol-ars consider this merely coincidental, as they did from the start. One-quarter of Jewish women at that time, for example, were named Maria.

3) There is no reason whatever to equate “Mary Magdalene” with “Mariamene,”
as Jacobovici claims.

4) So what if her DNA is different from that of “Yeshua” ? That particular :Mariamme” (as it is usually spelled today) could indeed have been the wife of that particular “Yeshua.”

5) What in the world is the “Jesus Family” doing, having a burial plot in Jerusalem, of all places, the very city that crucified Jesus? Galilee was their home. In Galilee they could have had such a family plot, not Judea. Besides all of which, church tradition – and Eusebius – are unanimous in reporting that Mary died in Ephesus, where the apostle John, faithful to his commission from Jesus on the cross, had accompanied Mary.

6) If this were Jesus’ family burial, what is Matthew doing there – if indeed “Ma-tia” is thus to be translated?

7) How come there is no tradition whatever – Christian, Jewish, or secular -- that any part of the Holy Family was buried at Jerusalem?

8) Please note the extreme bias of the director and narrator, Simcha Jacobovici. The man is an Indiana-Jones-wannabe, who oversensationalizes anything he touches. You may have caught him on his TV special regarding The Exodus, in which the man “explained” just everything that still needed proving or explaining in the Exodus account in the Old Testament! It finally became ludicrous, and now he’s doing it again. – As for James Cameron, how do you follow The Titanic? Well, with an even more “titanic” story. He should have known better.

There are more arguments, to be sure, but I want to get this off pronto.

With warm regards,

Paul L. Maier


18 posted on 02/26/2007 2:24:37 PM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

You know how it is, some nut escapes the nut box every once in a while.


19 posted on 02/26/2007 2:25:03 PM PST by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
How about a documentary about the life of Mohammed?

... there's no prophet in it...

20 posted on 02/26/2007 2:25:54 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I think it's time for Christians to play hard-ball when the annual "Debunk the Bible" books and movies come out between Lent and Easter. We need to let it be known that we will boycott Fox if they put these enemies of Christianity on their shows, as Shep and Cavuto have done today, with Sean sure to follow. I know no self-respecting Christian watches CNN, but Larry King loves to put these authors and producers on his show. Every sponsor of the TV special should be boycotted permanently.
To the argument that this is news and must be covered, someone should inform these clowns that the BBC did a special on this tomb find in 1997...hardly a current topic.
We don't have to slit anyone's throat, as the Muslims would do if anyone disrespected Mohammed, but we can refuse to support the purveyors of blasphemy against Jesus with our money.


21 posted on 02/26/2007 2:27:14 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

"How about a documentary about the life of Mohammed?
Nope... there's no prophet in it.

_____________________________
Speaking of prophet....

Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television.

"They just want to get money for it," Kloner said. "It was an ordinary middle-class Jerusalem burial cave," he added. "The names on the caskets are the most common names found among Jews at the time."


22 posted on 02/26/2007 2:27:37 PM PST by cowdog77 (" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Hey Cameron, I am a proctologist, so "up yours!"/sarcasm on.


23 posted on 02/26/2007 2:28:56 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
"I'm not a theologist"....

Heh.

24 posted on 02/26/2007 2:33:06 PM PST by DreamsofPolycarp (Ron Paul in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Is there a consensus among sober archeologists as to the translation of the words actually engraved on the ossuaries?


25 posted on 02/26/2007 2:33:32 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
"They just want to get money for it," Kloner said. "It was an ordinary middle-class Jerusalem burial cave," he added. "The names on the caskets are the most common names found among Jews at the time."

That summed it up pretty well.

26 posted on 02/26/2007 2:33:54 PM PST by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
... there's no prophet in it...

At the end of a long, hard, bad day at work - I needed that joke.

27 posted on 02/26/2007 2:36:55 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob ("Those who "abjure" violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

So they have DNA. Just who, or what are you going to match it too? Hummmmm. They've already "proven" that the Shroud of Torin was a fake, no DNA there. Where are you going to get a sample of Jesus Christ's DNA for a match? Tell me that!


28 posted on 02/26/2007 2:37:38 PM PST by timydnuc (I'll die on my feet before I'll live on my knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I thought the term was "theologian" not "theologist".

What fools these "celebrities" are.


29 posted on 02/26/2007 2:39:24 PM PST by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I don't believe this crap for a second.

But there is another angle to this too: Let's accept, merely for the sake of argument, that this is exactly what Cameron says it is, and that it disproves the ressurection. OK, now ask yourself, what kind of human being would be so mean-spirited as to publicize it and utterly destroy the lives of millions and millions of good people -- some of whom have nothing else going for them -- whose sense of peace, joy and hope depend on their faith in the resurrection of Christ?


30 posted on 02/26/2007 2:46:27 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

You owe me a Starbuck's, dude.....and a new keyboard.


31 posted on 02/26/2007 2:58:36 PM PST by Right Cal Gal (I wouldn't believe liberals if their tongues came notarized!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vrwinger

Yes, he was buried. He just didn't stay buried.


32 posted on 02/26/2007 2:59:59 PM PST by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

How would you know that?


33 posted on 02/26/2007 3:03:18 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I got news for James Cameron, even bigger news than his latest faux discovery, and that is: Jesus is alive and well, sitting at the right hand side of God the Father Almighty, and I just talked to him this morning.

And I might add, a few years ago I was struck from behind while driving down an interstate highway on night, a half ton truck was running with no lights on, I never saw him coming, I was running about 60, he hit me about 90+ according to the highway patrol. I was knocked into the shoulder, came back across the highway, into the median, went airborne, flipped, rolled and landed on the other side of the interstate. I tried to regain control of my car, but there was nothing left to control. My last words were 'Lord Jesus save me!' and I walked away with injuries, some serious injuries, but I walked away from a wreck the cops said I should not have survived. I had broken ribs, almost lost my right eye, fractured left wrist, I was a mess.

But that Scripture that says 'whosoever calleth upon the Name of the Lord shall be saved' was never more true, and in a further demonstration of how God had that night firmly under His control, there was an operating room nurse 5 minutes behind me on her way to work at the hospital I would end up being taken to, she stopped to assist. The highway patrol was about 5 to 10 minutes behind her, and if that isn't enough, an ambulance was coming my way from the other direction, having just finished a patient transfer to the very hospital I needed to go to. They stopped as well.

I was in the emergency room in record time. My eye healed up, my left wrist is healed up 100 percent and I'm back playing piano as well as I ever did, my ribs are sore sometimes, but basically ok.

Not only did the Lord Jesus deliver me from certain death, He demonstrated why He is also called 'The Great Physician', and I am alive and well because of Him.

So James Cameron better rethink what he thinks he's found, because the tomb of the Jesus *I* know is *EMPTY*, because He arose, and lives Forevermore.

Amen!


34 posted on 02/26/2007 3:04:17 PM PST by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Known to who as Mariamne, first I've ever heard that claim.

I've heard of her being referred to by that name.
How could they have found her bones in Jerusalem though, Dan Brown said she died in secret in France or someplace.

35 posted on 02/26/2007 3:09:34 PM PST by infidel29 (Gun Control: Taking firearms out of the hands of those who DO know right from wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

While I agree completely that this is just a hype to promote a show, and agree that there is no yet known way of distinguishing among the many named Jesus or Mary or Marianne, I can't help but wonder about the mindset of the believers. Suppose, at some time in the future, real and provable evidence of Jesus's death and burial were to be revealed. Would science rule the day? Or would faith rule the day? Would Christians rally round their long established truths? Or would they seek some new adaptation of their old beliefs? Fascinating thoughts.


36 posted on 02/26/2007 3:13:59 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Titanic (1997) - 182 Mistakes
37 posted on 02/26/2007 3:16:52 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
How about a documentary about the life of Mohammed?

LOL, if they did one they would not use the Koran as a script.

38 posted on 02/26/2007 3:35:16 PM PST by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

This particular brand of anti-christ is just out to make a buck.


39 posted on 02/26/2007 3:41:02 PM PST by BigFinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
When do the riots begin? Have to make some signs and threaten to cut some throats..

Whoops. Wrong religion.

"Love your enemies and bless those who curse you."

No one ever said being a Christian would be easy..

40 posted on 02/26/2007 3:46:56 PM PST by Texas Mom (Two places you're always welcome - church and Grandma's house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
How about a documentary about the life of Mohammed? ... there's no prophet in it...

ooooooooh . . . . you could be shot for that.

Literally.
Or beheaded.

TS
Have a nice day.

41 posted on 02/26/2007 3:47:48 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (A husband is what's left of a sweetheart after the nerve has been killed. -- Lou Costello)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
In Nomine Archeologia Patri, et Archeoligia Filii, et Spiritus Arcehologia Sancti.

Blahmen.

42 posted on 02/26/2007 3:52:07 PM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo

True. He is risen!


43 posted on 02/26/2007 3:59:50 PM PST by vrwinger (You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I just feel it real strong down in my bones that this is all a bunch of "hokum" and wishful thinking among Christian haters. . also, the Bible speaks to this clearly, so I won't be spending any time or money on any movies or anything about it.


44 posted on 02/26/2007 4:10:18 PM PST by Twinkie (Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwinger

He is Risen indeed!


45 posted on 02/26/2007 4:18:26 PM PST by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot; gulfcoast6
By the time his son would have died, the Gospels would already have been written and prophesied in the region and further to Greece and Rome.

Actually only the Gospel of Mark would have been written by the time of the death of the alleged son.

Most scholars date the other gospels in the second and third centuries. Mark is believed to be the only Gospel writer to have lived in the time of any eye witnesses.

The question I wish to see answered in the “documentary” is; we know for sources out side of the Bible that Jesus was crucified, do the bones in the ossuary of this Jesus show the evidence of the wounds inherent in this documented death?

If they do not then all of this is just hype.

46 posted on 02/26/2007 5:48:31 PM PST by Pontiac (Patriotism is the natural consequence of having a free mind in a free society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I'm not a theologist. I'm not an archaeologist. I'm a documentary filmmaker," he said.
And Michael Moore said the same thing. And HE IS A LIAR AS WELL.
Documentary. More like PackALiesAmentary


47 posted on 02/26/2007 5:56:08 PM PST by glymers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Is Camaron related to King James I of England? They're both named "James", after all.

("Jesus" is one rendering of the Hebrew name "Y'shua". The other rendering is the oh-so-exotic "Joshua".)


48 posted on 02/26/2007 6:01:58 PM PST by Redcloak (The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Here we go again. The left will do anything possible to destroy Christianity.


49 posted on 02/26/2007 6:05:01 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I swear I heard on the radio they were going to do DNA testing on the bones. And compare it to what?


50 posted on 02/26/2007 6:08:18 PM PST by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson