Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Falls Short On Election Promises
The Politico ^ | February 27, 2007 | Daniel W. Reilly and Jim VandeHei

Posted on 02/27/2007 7:15:56 AM PST by West Coast Conservative

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is discovering the cold truth about governing with a slim majority: It's much easier to promise behavioral change for Congress than to deliver it.

Pelosi vowed that five-day workweeks would be a hallmark of a harder-working Democratic majority. So far, the House has logged only one. Lawmakers plan to clock three days this week.

The speaker has denied Republicans a vote on their proposals during congressional debates -- a tactic she previously declared oppressive and promised to end. Pelosi has opened the floor to a Republican alternative just once.

Pelosi set a high standard for herself when she pledged to make this "the most ethical Congress in history" -- a boast that was the political equivalent of leading with her chin. And some critics have been happy to hit it.

She is drawing fire for putting Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.), who had $90,000 in alleged bribe money in his freezer, on the Homeland Security Committee. And The Washington Post reported during the weekend that she is helping chairmen raise money from donors with business before their committees.

Pelosi can count several big changes designed to curb abuses that plagued the Republican majority before it was dethroned in last fall's elections, including new limits on gifts from lobbyists. But her debut has not quieted skeptics who see her and the new majority failing to make the clean break with the deeply ingrained congressional culture.

"She has done exactly what she said she would do," said Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly.

For example, he noted, while the House is not always in session five days a weeks, many committees are working throughout the week. Pelosi promised an ambitious start to the new Congress, he said, and she had determined the best way to proceed was by limiting debate.

"In the future," Daly said, "we will do business in the regular order."

Pelosi seems to be following a familiar pattern. Twelve years ago, Speaker Newt Gingrich promised to reform the House and govern by principles of fairness and transparency. But, for leaders of both parties, the reality of ruling with a narrow majority translates into tight controls over floor debate, cozy relations with lobbyists and accommodating the needs of lawmakers (who hate working long weeks).

Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a congressional watchdog organization, said Jefferson's reelection put the new speaker in a bind.

"Pelosi had to put him somewhere," said Sloan, who has also worked as minority counsel for the House Judiciary Committee for then-ranking member John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.). "But I am troubled by the fact ... that (Jefferson) is the kind of guy who could not pass a security clearance test and yet now he has access to top-secret government info."

Sloan also took issue with Democrats' use of committee chairs for fundraising efforts, a tactic Republicans often abused in the last Congress.

"Given the scandals of last Congress, particularly involving (disgraced former lobbyist Jack) Abramoff, it doesn't look good," Sloan said. "It is very hard for people to understand the difference between what's legal and what's illegal."

Republicans are cutting Pelosi less slack than that. Eager to brand her a hypocrite, GOP strategists are closely tracking what they call a growing list of "broken promises" and are encouraging their members to attack her for them.

"She promised the most open and honest Congress in history and by any objective score, (Democrats) have fallen short," said Rep. Adam Putnam (R-Fla.).

Pressed on whether voters will care about procedural complaints, such as lack of floor votes for GOP proposals, Putnam said: "I think voters do care if you shut down the process to the point people cannot even offer an alternative, and you are stifling debate …You don't want to be constantly complaining about the process, but bottom line, they are abusing it."

Some Democratic lawmakers privately warn that Pelosi could blow a rare opportunity to change voters' perception of the party and Congress if she reverts to old Republican ways.

In a recent newspaper commentary, former Democratic Rep. Lee Hamilton of Indiana expressed concern "that the new Democratic majority in the House, which certainly understands the sting of unfair treatment, has on occasion yielded to the temptation of its newfound power to shut down Republican participation."

So far, the GOP has been shut out of virtually every big debate. The most recent example was the House fight over the war in Iraq, in which Democrats broke their promise to allow the GOP a vote on its nonbinding resolution supporting the troops.

Pelosi sympathizers said Republican critics are laying it on a bit thick.

"Oh, cry me a river," said former Democratic Rep. Tony Coelho. "For six years they ran a system that was autocratic, that didn't give the minority a shot at offering anything and now are saying 'mistreatment' …They never even let the Democrats have a voice."

Still, Pelosi's experience with the recent Iraq debate illustrates her challenge. She calculated that it would be harder to build bipartisan support for a Democratic resolution condemning the administration's troop "surge" if the debate were muddied by a generic, support-the-troops vote. In essence, she determined it was riskier, in the short term, to keep her pledge than to break it.

There is a practical reason for this approach, too. Alternatives are ripe for mischief. The minority party often puts together legislation designed to either embarrass or divide the other side.

That means there is almost always a temptation to backtrack on pledges of reform. Gingrich and his self-proclaimed "revolutionaries" roared to power in 1994 with promises to undo the feather-nesting and strong-arm tactics that had come to mark the Democratic reign -- then discovered that what they once deemed outrageous seemed more defensible once their party was in charge.

In light of this history, say some congressional scholars, Pelosi soon will be facing a choice.

"If we don't start seeing some opportunities for Republicans to offer real amendments on floor and to see some effort at collaboration that is genuine," said Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution, "then she and Democrats will properly be subject to criticism."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; congress; democrat; pelosi

1 posted on 02/27/2007 7:15:59 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Hehe, love it, falls 'short'...


2 posted on 02/27/2007 7:17:23 AM PST by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Luxury Jumbo Jet Pelosi is a complete liar.

Well, she IS a democrat....


3 posted on 02/27/2007 7:17:53 AM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative; gulfcoast6
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is discovering the cold truth about governing with a slim majority: It's much easier to promise behavioral change for Congress than to deliver it."

No offense to Reilly and VandeHei, but this isn't something Pelosi just discovered. False promises are standard procedure for politicians, and the Democrat-ick party is masterful at it.

4 posted on 02/27/2007 7:20:08 AM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
But, for leaders of both parties, the reality of ruling with a narrow majority translates into tight controls over floor debate, cozy relations with lobbyists and accommodating the needs of lawmakers (who hate working long weeks).

Politico.com is pretty much a creation of the WaPo. Hence, this article is pretty much an apologia for Nazi Pelosi. She can't help it, the poor dear, she wants to do good, but, well, how could she know it would be so difficult.

This site is going to pretend to play it straight, but don't be fooled(And I'm sure that you are not).

5 posted on 02/27/2007 7:26:45 AM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

if we had re-elected the republicans things would have notbeen much better.

The RINO's deserve everything they get for letting their base down.

I only can hope this leads to a new Gingrich-like renewal of conservatism in 2008


6 posted on 02/27/2007 7:28:47 AM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
I only can hope this leads to a new Gingrich-like renewal of conservatism in 2008

From your mouth to God's ears.

7 posted on 02/27/2007 7:31:22 AM PST by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Congress if she reverts to old Republican ways.

Ahem...More like Jim Wright (D) Texas...


8 posted on 02/27/2007 7:33:30 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Look, all that's going on here is what Newt and the GOP did to the Democrats in 1995.

Nothing to see here folks.

I'm not disappointed in "Grandma Mimi." This is just what I expected: Nothing. Except she gives great aid and comfort to the enemy of the United States. That is deplorable. Shame on her.


9 posted on 02/27/2007 7:39:23 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Are we halfway to the first 100 hours yet?


10 posted on 02/27/2007 7:45:06 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

No surprise, especially from the jet-limosine, arrogant socialist lout, Pelosi. Lying and deceit are standard fare. It seems to be a disease in Washington, ESPECIALLY among ThugoRats, that is spreading and getting worse.


11 posted on 02/27/2007 7:47:52 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Have they officially ended the first 100 hours yet?


12 posted on 02/27/2007 7:51:11 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a congressional watchdog organization, said Jefferson's reelection put the new speaker in a bind.

CREW - a congressional watchdog organization - HAH. CREW is a liberal activism organization. It must have really galled Melanie to criticize the Jefferson situation. Oh, and Sloan - the executive director of this "congressional watchdog" group - has also worked as minority counsel for the House Judiciary Committee for then-ranking member John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.). Some watchdog!

13 posted on 02/27/2007 7:54:07 AM PST by VRWCmember (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Forget elected representative government. Melanie Sloan can take down your congressman with a flick of her wrist.


14 posted on 02/27/2007 8:04:08 AM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Gosh, I would have never thought that Pelosi is just a typical bag of far left wind. The way she accepted the crown (gavel) you would have thought she was Queen of US.


15 posted on 02/27/2007 8:04:23 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

"Pelosi had to put him (Jefferson)somewhere."

Says who? If she was all she claimed to be, she could have said "I'll give you an assignment when the charges are cleared up - right now you're a liability to the party." She's an idiot, and the rest of the country is learning that fast.

They stomp their feet about the mandate they've received. Here's my question and I'd appreciate any pointers for researching same my fellow Freepers can offer: Did the newly elected frehsmen Democratic Congress critters receive MORE votes in their districts than the previous Democrat candidates (i.e., did they take votes away from their Republican opponent), or did the Republicans simply not vote for their candidate, but did not vote for the Democratic candidate? I thought this election was more about disgust with the RINO's that had betrayed the Party than it was about getting Dems in - witnessed especially by the fact that so many of the Dem candidates ran center/right instead of center/left.


16 posted on 02/27/2007 8:06:48 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (I wouldn't believe liberals if their tongues came notarized!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

she's a liar and a fraud.


17 posted on 02/27/2007 8:11:34 AM PST by Cucumber (what has 4 wheels and flies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
17 posts and no Claude Raines picture yet?
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!

18 posted on 02/27/2007 8:23:02 AM PST by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cucumber

She's a liberal, nuff said


19 posted on 02/27/2007 8:23:06 AM PST by Kaslin (In war, there are two exit strategies. One is called victory. The other is called defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Well thats it then, We need to start a committee to impeach her.
Or at least investigate her for the next 2 years.
/s
20 posted on 02/27/2007 8:23:57 AM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

So much for Democratic PROMISES.
Yet, the Kool-Aid dtrinkers will swallow her line unceasingly


21 posted on 02/27/2007 8:48:44 AM PST by radar101 (LIBERALS = Hypocrisy and Fantasy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
In 1994, Ms. Sloan served as Counsel for the Crime Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by then-Representative Charles Schumer (D-NY). There, she drafted portions of the 1994 Crime Bill, including the Violence Against Women Act. In 1993, Ms. Sloan served as Nominations Counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee, under then-Chairman, Senator Joe Biden (D-DE). Prior to serving in Congress, she was an associate at Howrey and Simon in Washington, D.C. and at Sonnenschein, Nath and Rosenthal in Los Angeles, California. Ms. Sloan received her A.B. and J.D. from the University of Chicago and has published in the Yale Law and Policy Review, Legal Times, The Washington Post, and the San Diego Union-Tribune.
22 posted on 02/27/2007 8:51:03 AM PST by radar101 (LIBERALS = Hypocrisy and Fantasy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
In 1994, Ms. Sloan served as Counsel for the Crime Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by then-Representative Charles Schumer (D-NY). There, she drafted portions of the 1994 Crime Bill, including the Violence Against Women Act. In 1993, Ms. Sloan served as Nominations Counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee, under then-Chairman, Senator Joe Biden (D-DE). Prior to serving in Congress, she was an associate at Howrey and Simon in Washington, D.C. and at Sonnenschein, Nath and Rosenthal in Los Angeles, California. Ms. Sloan received her A.B. and J.D. from the University of Chicago and has published in the Yale Law and Policy Review, Legal Times, The Washington Post, and the San Diego Union-Tribune.
23 posted on 02/27/2007 8:51:08 AM PST by radar101 (LIBERALS = Hypocrisy and Fantasy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson