Skip to comments.
O'Malley aid called key to weapons ban
Washington Times ^
| Tom LoBianco
Posted on 02/27/2007 11:26:32 AM PST by JZelle
ANNAPOLIS -- State lawmakers attempting again to ban assault weapons in Maryland are hoping Gov. Martin O'Malley will give his support as hearings on the issue begin today. "That's what we think is very different this year than in the past," said Sen. Michael G. Lenett, Montgomery Democrat and chief sponsor of the bill. "We have a governor who is very committed to public safety." Mr. O'Malley, a Democrat, pledged his support for the proposed ban while campaigning last year for governor. The Democrat-controlled General Assembly has failed four straight years to pass such legislation, and members think Mr. O'Malley's support this year might make the difference.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Government; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: assaultweapons; banglist; nra; omalley
posted on 02/27/2007 11:26:35 AM PST
"We have a governor who is very committed to public safety."
So he wants violent criminals locked up for long, long periods of time or does he only support window dressing like this proposed ban?
posted on 02/27/2007 11:32:37 AM PST
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
""We have a governor who is very committed to public safety." "
An armed society insures public safety. The Los Angeles bank robbers reaked havoc because of 'public safety' gun laws.
posted on 02/27/2007 11:36:41 AM PST
This O'Malley Baltimoron can't wait to do to the State of Murderland what he did as Mayor to the City of Bodymore. Thanks Marty. putz
posted on 02/27/2007 12:00:50 PM PST
To: JZelle; 2ndClassCitizen
very committed to public safety.
Since when was a gun ban conducive to public safety?
posted on 02/27/2007 12:43:33 PM PST
(My opinion worth what you paid.)
"We have a governor who is very committed to public safety." Mr. O'Malley, a Democrat, pledged his support for the proposed ban while campaigning last year for governor.
Emotional blather to pander to his bed-wetting liberal base. Where is the science to show any benefit to public safety by banning "ugly" semi-automatic rifles and not others? That is all it is since there is no such thing as an "assault rifle." Where is the data to show that banning any kind of firearm will improve public safety? Nowhere because it doesn't exist.
posted on 02/27/2007 1:02:06 PM PST
(For Democrats; victory in Iraq is not an option!)
Where is the science to show any benefit to public safety by banning "ugly" semi-automatic rifles and not others?
Don't worry, the DemonRATs plan to ban ALL semiautos soon. They won't discriminate against just the ugly ones anymore. Google HR 1022 and read it. Re-bans everything that the 1994 law did and adds lots more to the list.
Let's not forget that our illustrious president PROMISED to sign a re-authorization of the last ban too, so he's already sent the signal he'd sign this one.
Oh yeah, this one doesn't 'sunset' either....
posted on 02/27/2007 2:41:51 PM PST
It might be conducive to an eventual rebellion.
posted on 02/27/2007 5:13:48 PM PST
(Nancy Pelosi is Tokyo Rose)
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson