Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CPAC I saw (Michelle Malkin shares her thoughts on Ann Coulter)
Michelle Malkin ^ | Sunday March 4th, 2007 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 03/04/2007 8:28:45 AM PST by ajolympian2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-510 last
To: all the best

I'm not the one who is uptight - it is people who can't stand a single "bad" word who are uptight.


501 posted on 03/06/2007 8:13:41 AM PST by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Ooooooh, Ann drinks! She should be tarred and feathered! Get real.


502 posted on 03/06/2007 8:14:35 AM PST by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: jd777

Dude, are you real? Get off the stuff! Ann has gay friends as do many of us. The "f" word was meant as girly man which is what John Edwards is. And with that hair that doesn't move, what would you call him? I'll bet he uses a blow dryer and gel.


503 posted on 03/06/2007 8:17:08 AM PST by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
The kind of parent that drags kids to a 'family friendly' event like CPAC is what keeps a lot of therapists at work for decades! Sheesh! "Hey kids, we're going to CPAC and see Duncan Hunter and Mitt Romney! And if you're really good we will stay for the panel on government finance!"

"Hey, gee, Dad, that's swell!"




LOL!!!!! Like a laser, you home in on the very essence of the absurdity that Michelle is proposing.

While a case can surely be made for prolonging the beauty of "childhood innocence" as long as is practicable, most kids today are doubtless a little more calloused, and a little less naive than the estimable Ms. Malkin would like to think, or have us believe.

If you're gonna have kids that are exposed to political thought, current or classical, then by all means, open the floodgates as soon as you think they can start to grasp the import of it all.

Otherwise, what's the point?

CA....

504 posted on 03/06/2007 8:25:34 AM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
With a single word, Coulter sullied the hard work of hundreds of CPAC participants and exhibitors and tarred the collective reputation of thousands of CPAC attendees.

I would like to see a single FReeper tell us why Michelle is wrong. Coulter is a selfish, thoughtless child. She thinks only of herself. She could not give two craps about anyone else who spoke that day.

This doesn't have anything to do with whether one hates Democrats or John Edwards. It has to do with the hard work and preparation of our candidates, of getting the message out to the American people that there are great alternatives to Hillary and Obama and Edwards. People like Duncan Hunter and Mitt Romnney, for example, who most Americans have never heard of. And thanks to this stupid woman, they STILL don't know who they are. "Me, me , me" that is all Ann Coulter is about. And I for one am sick of it.

She isn't even a good speaker. Anyone who has heard her can attest to that: she is great in print and simply dull at the podium. I saw her at one event where Phyllis Schlafly was being honored. Schlafly spoke with strength as well as humor, skewering opponents with class. Then Ann took the stage, with boring sophmoric rants and near profanities. The crowd was left totally flat, with several people saying she insulted Schlafly with her crude and stupid speech. Do you think she cared? She is just useless and should not be invited to CPAC again.

505 posted on 03/06/2007 8:28:41 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; phantomworker; ajolympian2004; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; ...
FoxFan ping! (Michelle Malkin, Fox News contributor)

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

506 posted on 03/06/2007 8:30:27 AM PST by nutmeg (National Security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: juliej
Well, I wouldn't know, I've never been one of the "abstinence til marriage" conservatives but this is the first I've heard of an "age clause" where you're allowed to be single and have sex as long as you reach the age of 35. (alot of these self-righteous types don't even believe a married man and women shouldn't be using contraceptives and should "abstain" from any sex that isn't for the purpose of procreation)

My own view is that while it's a really bad idea for underage kids such as teenagers to be fooling around with sex before they are mature enough to handle the responsibilities, I've never had a problem with unmarried adults in their 20s having sex.

And no, I don't "get" your point unless you're seriously arguing Ann Coulter remained pure and virginal until she was "over the age of 35" (which means she lost her virginity around 1998 or so). Apparently it's "do as I say, not as I do" for some people.

507 posted on 03/06/2007 8:37:43 AM PST by BillyBoy (Don't blame Illinois for Pelosi -- we elected ROSKAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

No, you really don't get my point. I was being sarcastic. I would expect an attractive woman of a certain age to have a love life. Case closed. People have got to learn how to read!


508 posted on 03/06/2007 9:02:06 AM PST by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy
"It is effective in gaining Ann attention but it costs conservatives in untold ways because of the ammunition that gives the liberal MSM, academia, Hollywood etc."

No one could have been more polite and circumspect in his language than Newt Gingrich as Speaker of the House, yet he was villainously defamed and castigated. People who had never seen him or heard him speak were convinced he was the Devil incarnate.

Those who are brainwashed by the incessant drumbeats of the MSM scarcely recognize their information intoxication.

Ann perhaps believes a little cold water is needed to shock them awake. Who knows? Maybe sometimes it works. At least she is speaking her mind, and saying with a voice that gets attention what many of us would like to say if we but had the microphone.

She is certainly not the exemplar to which I wish my daughters would aspire, but if she's going to continue wading into the swamp or the jungle, she's going to need her claws.

509 posted on 03/06/2007 2:39:23 PM PST by NicknamedBob (I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Last night Bill Mahr tried to lamely defend his calling for the assassination of the Vice President. Mahr is a disgrace - and yet he is a liberal icon.


510 posted on 03/07/2007 5:39:32 AM PST by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-510 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson