Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter at CPAC
National Center for Public Policy Research ^ | 2-4-07 | Amy Ridenour

Posted on 03/04/2007 2:59:04 PM PST by SJackson

Ann Coulter at CPAC

I'm sorry to see that Ann Coulter once again made certain news coverage of CPAC would be focused upon her instead of upon the conservative movement's goals and principles.

The National Center for Public Policy Research is one of very many co-sponsors of CPAC, and has been for some years. After Ann Coulter's offensive speech last year, we telephoned the organizers and strongly suggested that Ann Coulter's behavior was harmful to, and unrepresentative of, the conservative movement. We said we were considering pulling out our co-sponsorship because of Ann Coulter's "raghead" comment, and asked them to not invite Ann Coulter to speak in CPAC 2007, or, at the very least, only invite her if she was told to can the offensive speech, and explicitly agreed to do so. I had 90 percent decided to stop our co-sponsorship for CPAC 2007, but the sponsor seemed to be taking our concerns about Coulter's 2006 remarks seriously and with what seemed to us to be appropriate sympathy, so the National Center co-sponsored CPAC again this year.

(I am, by the way. under no illusion that CPAC's main sponsors lose sleep over possibly losing the National Center's co-sponsorship. We do pay a fee to co-sponsor, and all the fees paid by all the co-sponsors together do add up to quite a tidy sum, but I'm sure any one co-sponsor is quite expendable.)

As has been widely reported, Ann Coulter not only once again went out of her way to use a nasty epithet, she pushed her offensiveness up a notch, using a word that is even more universally reviled than the derogatory term she hurled last year.

So, CPAC's sponsors either invited Coulter back without first getting her pledge that she would speak without using demeaning epithets, or they obtained her pledge, and she broke her word.

We'll ask.

It would be better, in my opinion, to not have a CPAC at all than to have one that presents conservatism as a hostile, people-hating ideology. We conservatives have enough trouble overcoming the false things that are said about us without paying for a platform upon which we shoot ourselves annually in the foot.

Some of my past commentary on Ann Coulter can be found here and here.

Here's a roundup of other conservative (and moderate) commentary on the Coulter situation:
"With Friends Like These... (re Ann Coulter)," JonQuixote

"CPAC is Shocked--Shocked!--by Ann Coulter's Remarks," Jon Swift

"Coulter Screams for Attention, Again - Losing Whatever Supporters She Still Had," Patterico

"Ann Coulter Doesn't Speak For Me," Wizbang

"Coulter Said What? (Bumped)," Captain's Quarters

"The Shame Of Ann Coulter," The Moderate Voice

"Ann Coulter at CPAC," Betsy's Page

"Ann Coulter calls John Edwards...," Right Thoughts

"Count Me Out," Lone Star Times

"Ann Coulter Calls John Edwards The 'F-word'," Gay Patriot

"Coulter Needs A Rehab," Riehl World View

"Apologizing for Ann Coulter," MyDD

"On Ann Coulter, John Edwards, and Civility," historymike
P.S. A hostile liberal blogger issues a challenge to conservatives:
Reality: [Ann Coulter] is your biggest star. The people you claim to speak for feel she speaks for them much, much more than you do -- and they're right. She is modern conservatism's id -- she's the one who says what the rest of you would say if you didn't feel it would cost you your standing as reasonable, responsible people.

Want to prove me wrong? You cut her off. You boycott the sponsors of TV shows that still invite her on as a guest. You show up at her book signings and campus appearances and hand out flyers quoting her nastiest bon mots. You boycott CPAC next year if she's invited, and demand that others do the same. Or if you have a problem with boycotts as a matter of principle, at the very least urge your fellow conservatives, on college campuses and elsewhere, to stop extending invitations to her, given the profound harm you say she does to your movement.

But you won't do that, will you? In that case, shut the hell up, hypocrites, and acknowledge that while Coulter may be the bad apple in the family, your door is always open to her.
Well?


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; conservativefox; coulter; cpac; edwards; johnedwards; superbabe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: SJackson
Actually ANN would have been mean if she would have accused Al Gore of being a faggot.. BECAUSE he sounds like one.. Edwards acts like one but sounds normal.. Could be ANN could care less about either of them, for they are only democrats..

Which is much worse than being a faggot..

WHich might have been her POINT..

141 posted on 03/04/2007 6:50:52 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Coulter isn't the threat. She's just one voice.

Rudy is the true threat.

142 posted on 03/04/2007 6:51:41 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinives
She didn't call Edwards a faggot. Please read her entire remark before commenting.

The quote I've seen is this:

“I was going to say something about John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot.’”

Unfortunately, that seems pretty clear. Maybe it does better in context, but I can't find her entire speech online.

I would guess that what she meant to say was something like this:

"We live in a culture so ridiculously sensitive to political correctness that someone can be forced to go to rehab just for using a word like "faggot" or "dyke." I'm a long way from being politically correct, so I'd better not tell you what I really think of John Edwards."

But that's not what she said.

143 posted on 03/04/2007 6:54:39 PM PST by TChad (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
Not ridiculous at all. Speakers at CPAC are symbols of who conservatives are. Just a fact.

LOL!
Ragheads suck. Just a fact.

S-a-a-a-a-y. This could get to be fun!

... meaningless, but fun!

144 posted on 03/04/2007 7:02:13 PM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Republicans in 2007 have no balls : )

What do you mean 2007??!!??

145 posted on 03/04/2007 7:03:42 PM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Ditto. I like Rudy. But not for POTUS. V's wife.(He was a good mayor,but there's a huge difference).


146 posted on 03/04/2007 7:04:56 PM PST by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
You can. Do you expect them to invite you to speak at CPAC next year?

Sorry, I got to sort my socks that day.
However, if you're invited, may I have your autograph?

: )

147 posted on 03/04/2007 7:05:32 PM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
And Ann Coulter still stinks.

Bottle it and sell it is my suggestion. I'd get my wife a bottle of it as soon as it hit the market.

148 posted on 03/04/2007 7:06:15 PM PST by LowOiL (Paul wrote, "Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil" (Rom. 12:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Yeah : )


149 posted on 03/04/2007 7:08:47 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Misery loves miserable company.......ask any liberal. Hunter in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
She was making a point not about gay people; but politically correct people.

No facts allowed. Please report to rehab posthaste.

150 posted on 03/04/2007 7:08:57 PM PST by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Methinks the entire GOP needs MAJOR rehab.


151 posted on 03/04/2007 7:11:49 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Misery loves miserable company.......ask any liberal. Hunter in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
And Ann Coulter still stinks.


152 posted on 03/04/2007 7:25:07 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cinives
Besides,she didn't even call him a faggot. It's an uproar over nothing

I have been troubled over what I thought was my own "lone voice" in this matter. That is my inner voice. Yes, others have mentioned this previously. Someone kindly rephrased Ann's statement for her. It was to the effect, that since the politically correct climate is so unfairly charged, that the tiniest aside, might bring on the storm. Example if "faggot" brings on the storm, anything about John Edwards at this point could be used to raise a furore.

Ann is the shrewdest person in this. Again and again persons have been backed up against the wall over a comment. They have explained and re-worded what they said. They have apologized. What has been the result?

The sharks closed in with a greater feeding frenzy.

Ann did not fall for that tactic. A redoubtable Canadian feminist did say to the effect. "Don't apologize, don't explain, just get on with it". (Nellie McClung).

I will listen to the Doctor of Democracy tomorrow. Perhaps he can steady the troops. (Laughs).

153 posted on 03/04/2007 7:47:23 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

What candidate in the right mind is going to side with her on this? The idea is to get elected and you will not do that if you cozy up to her. That's what any politician running for office needs and that is to give the left (and he press) ammo to be used against them.


154 posted on 03/04/2007 8:18:43 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

It depends on what your definition of "is" is....

she knew exactly what she was doing and mentioning edwards name with faggot in the same sentance was going to marry the two.


155 posted on 03/04/2007 8:20:50 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: cinives

and you are just perpetuating the excuse making.

She's smart enough to know what she was doing and that was link edwards to the term, faggot. She can tap dance around the issue but it's the net effect that matters and she damn well knew this would cause a stink.

She could have used any of a number of terms to whip up on him but she decided to introduce questions about his sexuality.


156 posted on 03/04/2007 8:24:27 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"faggots"

Totally inappropriate word, should have used

RUMP RANGERS...
157 posted on 03/04/2007 8:36:22 PM PST by Fred (Looking Forward to Impeaching the OTHER Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
John is a metrosexual who appears to be obsessed with his looks and hair, but I don't think he's a homo.

hmmmm... I don't know for sure....but if I was a betting man, I'd bet he's a fag.

158 posted on 03/04/2007 8:50:49 PM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Piss Off Jackson.

No Republican needs permission from the likes of you or your cadre of RINO supporting mendacious prigs to use wit and innuendo against the political oppositions, let alone a champion like Anne Coulter. Waxing a little Victorian are you?

Well you can F%&K RIGHT OFF AND GO JOIN THE DU.

159 posted on 03/05/2007 8:00:42 AM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Ann Coulter, Shield Maiden of the GOP...

I remember our conversation about how the state of the world seems to be paralleling the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Anne indeed may be much as you say.

Well Put Sir Frank. Anne acquitted herself well in the Halls of the Mountain King. THe prissy RINOs sought to dominate the court, and Anne laid the whip on them with one sentence.

It may be necessary to promote her from Shield Maiden to elfinhood.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Frodo: " Oh my Goodness, Ann, Edwards IS a Mordor Faggot!"

160 posted on 03/05/2007 8:42:41 AM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson