Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter at CPAC
National Center for Public Policy Research ^ | 2-4-07 | Amy Ridenour

Posted on 03/04/2007 2:59:04 PM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-169 last
To: Publius6961

Methinks the entire GOP needs MAJOR rehab.


151 posted on 03/04/2007 7:11:49 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Misery loves miserable company.......ask any liberal. Hunter in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
And Ann Coulter still stinks.


152 posted on 03/04/2007 7:25:07 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cinives
Besides,she didn't even call him a faggot. It's an uproar over nothing

I have been troubled over what I thought was my own "lone voice" in this matter. That is my inner voice. Yes, others have mentioned this previously. Someone kindly rephrased Ann's statement for her. It was to the effect, that since the politically correct climate is so unfairly charged, that the tiniest aside, might bring on the storm. Example if "faggot" brings on the storm, anything about John Edwards at this point could be used to raise a furore.

Ann is the shrewdest person in this. Again and again persons have been backed up against the wall over a comment. They have explained and re-worded what they said. They have apologized. What has been the result?

The sharks closed in with a greater feeding frenzy.

Ann did not fall for that tactic. A redoubtable Canadian feminist did say to the effect. "Don't apologize, don't explain, just get on with it". (Nellie McClung).

I will listen to the Doctor of Democracy tomorrow. Perhaps he can steady the troops. (Laughs).

153 posted on 03/04/2007 7:47:23 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

What candidate in the right mind is going to side with her on this? The idea is to get elected and you will not do that if you cozy up to her. That's what any politician running for office needs and that is to give the left (and he press) ammo to be used against them.


154 posted on 03/04/2007 8:18:43 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

It depends on what your definition of "is" is....

she knew exactly what she was doing and mentioning edwards name with faggot in the same sentance was going to marry the two.


155 posted on 03/04/2007 8:20:50 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: cinives

and you are just perpetuating the excuse making.

She's smart enough to know what she was doing and that was link edwards to the term, faggot. She can tap dance around the issue but it's the net effect that matters and she damn well knew this would cause a stink.

She could have used any of a number of terms to whip up on him but she decided to introduce questions about his sexuality.


156 posted on 03/04/2007 8:24:27 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"faggots"

Totally inappropriate word, should have used

RUMP RANGERS...
157 posted on 03/04/2007 8:36:22 PM PST by Fred (Looking Forward to Impeaching the OTHER Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
John is a metrosexual who appears to be obsessed with his looks and hair, but I don't think he's a homo.

hmmmm... I don't know for sure....but if I was a betting man, I'd bet he's a fag.

158 posted on 03/04/2007 8:50:49 PM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Piss Off Jackson.

No Republican needs permission from the likes of you or your cadre of RINO supporting mendacious prigs to use wit and innuendo against the political oppositions, let alone a champion like Anne Coulter. Waxing a little Victorian are you?

Well you can F%&K RIGHT OFF AND GO JOIN THE DU.

159 posted on 03/05/2007 8:00:42 AM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Ann Coulter, Shield Maiden of the GOP...

I remember our conversation about how the state of the world seems to be paralleling the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Anne indeed may be much as you say.

Well Put Sir Frank. Anne acquitted herself well in the Halls of the Mountain King. THe prissy RINOs sought to dominate the court, and Anne laid the whip on them with one sentence.

It may be necessary to promote her from Shield Maiden to elfinhood.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Frodo: " Oh my Goodness, Ann, Edwards IS a Mordor Faggot!"

160 posted on 03/05/2007 8:42:41 AM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers; All

Gee, a person who supports a candidate who is Pro-homosexual marriage, anti-secondamendment and is a typical lawyer candidate.

Of course rudy supporters dislike ann, she also said that she did not like Rudy or McCain.

The fact is this faux shock ties into the MSM fauning over a Hilary Clinton clone on the republican primary.


161 posted on 03/05/2007 9:24:42 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
Not only should Ann Coulter be invited back to CPAC,

SHE SHOULD BE A HEADLINER AT CPAC!!!!!!


162 posted on 03/05/2007 9:26:18 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: hophead

Those terms are not banned. They are however disrespectful and when there are used, it causes a huge storm, like what we are seeing now. Ann knew what she was doing and got exactly what see wanted!


163 posted on 03/05/2007 2:25:49 PM PST by CJ-50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

LOL


164 posted on 03/05/2007 5:16:55 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

True; but any kind of publicity seems to doom those that fall into it.


165 posted on 03/05/2007 5:20:25 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: basil

PC the epidemic of the century. The dumber they are; the more they afflicted with it.


166 posted on 03/05/2007 5:22:42 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CJ-50
"Those terms are not banned."

Bullsh1t they are not banned. Who wants to face this fury over the use of those words? Use fagot or nigger in a sentence when you are running for office and see where it gets you. Or even better how about "macaca". Does that ring a bell? Who the hell knew what "macaca" meant?
Children have been suspended from school for these words. If they are not banned, then why is there punishment?
167 posted on 03/05/2007 6:08:27 PM PST by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: hophead
Use fagot or nigger in a sentence when you are running for office and see where it gets you. Or even better how about "macaca". Does that ring a bell? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yes, but you miss the point, Ann as the court jester among the MSM anointed NOBILITY is NOT running for office.

Bearding the Mountain Kings in their own lair is an accomplishment, revealing the triviality of these spineless MSM candidates.

Those who support these middle of the road Democrat liberal clones as Republicans are offended by Ann's remark, and those who are conservatives are not offended. Ann applied a type of one line fractional distillation, and if people are STILL raving about Ann's contretemps, wit and humor, then it merely tells everyone where their politics are.

So vote RINO, but do not insult intelligence with this continuing witless babble.

168 posted on 03/05/2007 7:29:51 PM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: hophead
You won't be breaking any laws when you use them, but you have to be ready for the reaction. When you disrespect someone, they are not going to like it.

I don't want people to use them but I will not stop anyone from using them. I never want to see books being burned of citizens locked-up for what they say.

169 posted on 03/05/2007 8:19:03 PM PST by CJ-50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-169 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson