Check out the original too (1962). Great flick...
Posted on 03/15/2007 6:34:23 AM PDT by meg88
Why '300' so deeply troubles Hollywood
Posted: March 15, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern
In pondering the question of whether it was appropriate to present children with frightening images, C.S. Lewis answered:
"Since it is so likely that they will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker."
Lewis understood something that the political left decidedly does not: young people, males especially, need worthy role models.
The few masculine heroes the left serves up – Mumia, Che, Leonard Peltier – are murderous thugs masquerading as martyrs, incapable of being emulated by the comfortable minions who admire them.
For the rank and file, progressive opinion shapers glorify passivity, petulance, self-absorption and sexual ambiguity.
(Column continues below)
The young guys on the left try to fashion themselves thusly, but their innate and undisciplined sense of aggression inevitably seeks an outlet.
From what I can see, that outlet takes the form of vile language – a recent survey showed "Daily Kos" to have 20 times more profanity to the page than "Free Republic" – and self mutilation through multiple piercings and tattoos.
Oh yeah, and occasionally graffiti. That's about it.
The young males who recreate themselves in this image can't feel very good about themselves. Neither can their "partners" of whatever gender.
These opinion shapers can sustain the worth of this image only because they monopolize the visual media. And when that monopoly is threatened, there is hell to pay.
This I discovered by happenstance.
Unaware of the controversy to come, I used the excuse of an overcast sky to duck out of yard work and into my neighborhood cinema for a Saturday matinee of the movie "300."
Directed by Zack Snyder and based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller, the movie tells the well-known story of Spartan King Leonidas and the battle at Thermopylae and does so in great visual style.
I went for no better reason than the previews intrigued me. Given its R rating, I was hoping that I would not be the only one in the theater at 1:30 in the afternoon. I wasn't. The theater was about 2/3 full. Something was going on here.
That something has the critical community in a snit. "It's not so much the body count or even the blood lust that's disturbing," opined CNN's Tom Charity two days before the opening. "It's that the film, with its macho militarism, seems out of step in a war-weary time."
Out of step were CNN's critic and his colleagues. The film grossed a stunning $71 million opening weekend, a figure twice as high as even optimistic projections, higher than the next nine films combined, a figure that defied the critics' best effort to cripple the movie at the starting gate.
And that $71 million is just the beginning.
Wrote one liberal blogger in summarizing the critical response, "I mean, even normally well-heeled mainstream film reviewers are really, really disgusted with the brazen orientalism, homophobia, sexism, racism and testosterone-heavy jingoism."
Had the audience known the film had so much added value – orientalism? – the opening weekend might have topped $100 million.
Still, the blogger's summary was not off the mark. A.O. Scott of the New York Times began his review thusly: "'300' is about as violent as 'Apocalypto' and twice as stupid."
It's not that Scott opposes violence. He found some of the images in Quentin Tarantino's "astonishingly violent" "Kill Bill" "rather thrilling." It is just that Scott opposes violence that serves a noble purpose like that in "300" or in any Mel Gibson movie.
At Newsday meanwhile, after debating whether the American military mission mirrored the Spartans' or Persians', the self-deluding Gene Seymour opined that it didn't matter because the movie is "too darned silly to withstand any ideological theorizing."
No, what upsets Seymour and Scott and their fellow cinematic travelers is that "300" is neither silly nor stupid.
These critics know the film will have a powerful effect on the audience. They know what that effect is, and they don't like it at all precisely because "300" is ideological to the core.
In the film, rather than appease "the thousand nations of the Persian empire," Leonidas and 300 of his best special forces ops take pre-emptive action against this imminent third-world threat.
While the 300 journey afar to confront the multicultural Persian hordes, the lovely and loyal Queen Gorgo tries to rouse a divided and even treacherous congress back home.
"We are at war, gentlemen," she reminds them. She then argues for a massive troop surge in the hope that the efforts of "a king and his men have not been wasted to the pages of history."
As is obvious to the viewer, these congressmen are no more "war-weary" than the film critics at CNN. They have sacrificed nothing and suffered nothing.
The queen exhorts them nonetheless to send reinforcements "for the preservation of liberty ... for justice ... for law and order ... for reason." Only a progressive film critic could mistake her unambiguous and unapologetic pro-Western message.
The Persians certainly got it. "Iranians outraged over movie '300,' calling it insult to ancient culture," blasted the headline from the Associated Press.
To be sure, the film is a bit over the top. The well-ripped Spartans could pass for the Chippendales in designer battle gear. And the androgynous Xerxes looks scarily like the artist formerly known as Prince but two feet taller and with killer abs.
Nor are the Spartans ideal role models for American troops. They have been bred to near perfection by a program of infanticide that even the critics find troubling – the Spartans had yet to invent the conscience salve of partial-birth abortion–and they take no prisoners, real or figurative.
That much said, the film presents an attractive image of disciplined male camaraderie that the left is incapable of even imagining.
Early on, in fact, Leonidas distinguishes the mission of his men from that of the "boy-lovers" of Athens (and did that line send the critics howling!).
"A new age has begun," the king tells his troops, "an age of freedom, and all will know that 300 Spartans gave their last breath to defend it." Although the sets are virtual, the emotions are real and raw.
Unlike so many critically cherished Hollywood films, the violence in "300" is not purposeless. There is nothing camp or ironic about it.
Nor does the film stray all that far from historical accounts to create this image (although one interesting deviation is that the movie Spartans are undone by blowback from their eugenics program).
"If critics think that '300' reduces and simplifies the meaning of Thermopylae into freedom versus tyranny," writes classicist Victor Davis Hanson, "they should reread carefully ancient accounts and then blame Herodotus, Plutarch and Diodorus."
The U.S. Marines have never had a better recruiting film. The young males who dominate the audience will leave the theater not so much eager to behead a Persian as to examine their own, dare I say it, manliness.
The progressive media moguls, who have so dominated what these young men see and hear, can offer them no such visions "of brave knights and heroic courage."
They are losing constituents with every showing of "300," and they are howling mad about it.
Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue.
– a recent survey showed "Daily Kos" to have 20 times more profanity to the page than "Free Republic" – and self mutilation through multiple piercings and tattoos.
.
.
.
.
Only twenty times more ???
WTF
Just watch how many Hollywood 300 knock offs they make. Troubled? Yea, that they didn't think of it first!
I think hollywood is also nervous because UNKNOWN actors and actresses in front of a blue screen in an enclosed studio can produce a mega block buster.
Who needs left wing mega performers when it is now proven a GOOD story can reach an audience without a smug oscar winner.
Wow! This is sounding like a movie I'll have to buy when it shows up on DVD, and I rarely buy them.
Where was this study and why wasn't it posted here! lol
From what I can see, that outlet takes the form of vile language...and self mutilation through multiple piercings and tattoos.
Oh yeah, and occasionally graffiti. That's about it.
Don't forget all the felony vandalism at the anti-war protests. All those Starbucks windows somehow threaten world peace.
SCREW THE LEFT!
BWAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA!
It's fantastic. See it on a big screen. I'm a history prof teaching a course called "Technology and the Culture of War," and this movie makes ALL the major points about the "western way of war."
their hedonistic world view does not compute duty and honor.
right vs wrong.
A follow-up to the original article put DU at 945,000 pages. I think that's roughly 200 to 1 compared to FR.
Same author, same visual style, just as much violence.
Hmmm, wonder what the difference is?
There were no metrosexuals at Thermopylae.
The left has tried to oprify manhood, the feminists have tried to criminalize it, the hedonists tried to remove the manliness from the english language; based on the runaway success of this movie, they have not only failed they have been humiliated.
I think the next step is to eliminate the actors entirely. You can create a CGI person just as easily as a CGI background.
After the Passion we had a slew of christian based but christians are bad movies (like that one about the crusades)
The left will now immitate the style but not the substance.
Agreed, the closest the left can come to this is a Gay-Pride parade."
Now, that is a withering line. I can't wait to use it myself. Something like this:
"When Republicans talk about male bonding, it is something like the Marine Corps. When Democrats talk about it, it is just a Gay Pride parade."
That is good...and right on! I hope you don't mind if I plagiarize from you!
Not at all, I plagiarize all the time.
Do you really think I made up my own tag line?
Hollywood is based entirely on play acting. The minstrils of olde think because they play a doctor on TV they are a doctor. (ie actreesses going to DC to testify about FARMING!)
Those that have brains either left or right are very few and very far between.
>>>– a recent survey showed "Daily Kos" to have 20 times more profanity to the page than "Free Republic"
Was that before or after the Coulter/Edwards flap? Seems like the word fa***** appears on a lot of non-Coulter threads these days, where I can't hardly recall its use on FR prior to that comment. Perhaps Ann has contributed to the coaresning of the culture she is trying to protect.
They have obviously not read DU lately in terms of dirty words.
On a related note...
Weekly Standard Scrapbook: Lefty site has 60x more profanity than FR
Wow. Nails it!
Before everybody falls all over themselves praising the Spartans, it ought to be noted that they were perhaps the foremost practitioners of male-on-male sex in the ancient world. The Athenians didn't hold a candle (so to speak) to the Spartans in that regard.
BINGO!
From what I've read it is, ah, ahistorical to the core. Which doesn't thrill me, as a history buff.
Er, the author might have wanted to do a wee bit more research on ancient Sparta....
DU trolls probably bring FR's average "up".
True the Spartans were a warrior society, but that is not what this film is about. The Spartans were allies with Athens and the other Greek city states against a common enemy, Persia. Unlike the liberals and Democrats of today, the Spartans and their allies put aside their differences and animosities to unite against a foe that was bent on annihilating them. Unlike the cut and run white flag wavers and appeasers of today, the Spartans were willing to sacrifice themselves to preserve their civilization. It is the depiction of their courage and self sacrifice that enrages the liberals who are perfectly willing to appease and surrender to our enemies in the name of peace.
Didn't Heinlein write a short story about a time when actors were robotic machines? It's been decades since I read it, but I believe the main character was the fellow who repaired them.
The Spartans had truly weird sexual practices. On their marriage night, women had to shave their heads and dress like soldiers. Male on male sex was sort of a dominance behavior, and the entire ethos of Sparta was about power. However, they did vary from the others in their area (such as the Athenians) in that young boys were not automatically used for sex by older males in their family, and furthermore, boys and teenager males were not the sexual ideal of Sparta.
The Spartans also practiced (post birth) eugenics and kept a very angry and mistreated slave class, the Helots.
The point is not that we should emulate Spartan society, however, but that we should emulate the ideals of courage, resistance and hope in the face of all odds. The 300 Spartans were wiped out in that battle, but their sacrifice enabled the remainder of the Spartans and the Greeks to win, thus saving Western civilization. That was the message Herodotus got out of it (the Greeks didn't like the Spartans very much, btw) and that was the message that it has projected for millenia.
Wow, he really was prescient....
Insert porn-flick joke here....
On the contrary, I think Hollywood will love this movie.
They are soulless execs just out to make money. They made this movie for $65 million, with minimal sets, no stars, and in some 60 days. I't's a blockbuster. The formula works. The audience loved it.
Watch them perk up and you will see multiple attempts to recreate this success.
Wow, he really was prescient....
___________________________________________________
...in more ways than I'll live to see.
hmmmmmmmm
I think Sin City was far more brutal than 300. The violence was more personal, gritty, vicious, and less stylized than in 300 where it was portrayed with a visual beauty. I.e. splashing blood like a Jackson Pollock painting.
For later. Need to see this movie.
By the way, last August I was invited to the Oval Office along with VDH and Keegan for a one-hour sit-down with the Pres. on, among other things, military history and its lessons.
"I can see now why you Spartans are not afraid of death."
Athenian tourist, upon tasting Sparta's black-bean porridge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.