Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nature of War Makes Airlift Essential, General Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | Capt. Travis Tougaw, USAF

Posted on 03/16/2007 4:36:11 PM PDT by SandRat

BAGRAM AIR BASE, Afghanistan, March 16, 2007 – Airlift is essential to success in the war in Afghanistan, the commander of U.S. Transportation Command said here March 14.

Air Force Gen. Norton A. Schwartz visited Bagram to observe and speak about the airlift mission being performed throughout Afghanistan.

As the single manager for global air, land, and sea transportation for the Defense Department, Schwartz said he’s familiar with the partnerships exhibited here among the U.S. services and coalition forces. "The team at Bagram is, in fact, a joint team," he said. "People appreciate what each other do and try to provide mutual support. Teamwork is evident, and it's very satisfying to see people committed to the mission."

Bases in Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkey, Europe and the United States make up the airlift team for Operation Enduring Freedom.

"My impression is that the team is effectively supporting the folks that need it -- the shooters," Schwartz said. "It is clear that there's a sense of urgency here. It is clear that people are engaged. They feel passionately about the mission. And as a guy who's seven or eight thousand miles away, to see it personally is very satisfying."

The nature of the war in Afghanistan requires successful airlift, Schwartz said.

"This kind of fight cannot be effectively prosecuted from main operating bases. It's a distributed fight, and that requires us to be able to sustain those forces while they're the deployed," he said. "It is absolutely clear that we're doing that with considerable effect."

In addition to delivering troops, food, water, ammunition, and other supplies to the field, the airlift assets here are also called upon to move injured personnel.

"Medevac is what I call the quiet mission, because it does not get that much attention unless the people who are being evacuated are very prominent like Bob Woodruff from ABC News last year," Schwartz said. "But the truth of the matter is, the treatment that Mr. Woodruff received is exactly the same as what our troops get."

The medical evacuation system underwrites the all-volunteer force, the general said.

“Our youngsters know that if they get banged up, we'll leave no stone unturned to return them as quickly as possible to the best medical care, and that is what we do. In my view, that's how you sustain an all-volunteer force."

Using the C-17 Globemaster III for aeromedical evacuation greatly enhances the care given to the patients, the general said, because that platform has power, lighting, oxygen and other tools available for patient treatment.

That kind of versatility will be a key feature in new airlift platforms the Air Force develops, Schwartz said. He used the KC-X, the next generation of tanker, as an example. The KC-X will "certainly be a tanker first, but will have passenger, cargo, and air-evac capability designed in from the beginning rather than as an afterthought," he said.

Military commanders of the 21st century shouldn’t have to rely on aging aircraft designed and built for 20th century wars, Schwartz said.

"Future commanders will have modern platforms that operate with much higher reliability and that will be very versatile,” he said. “I think people understand that aging airplanes are an issue. The battles that we're fighting and likely to fight for the next few years are distributed fights that need airlift more than ever."

(Air Force Capt. Travis Tougaw is assigned to 455th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs.)



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; airlift; essential; europe; frwn; kyrgyzstan; turkey; us

1 posted on 03/16/2007 4:36:19 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!

WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!

2 posted on 03/16/2007 4:36:56 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Everything in the military is, in one way or another, essential to the nature of war. If it isn't then get rid of it.


3 posted on 03/16/2007 4:41:58 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
You can't talk about OEF airlift without mentioning the C-130 Hercules, which is the backbone of intra-theater airlift in Afghanistan. Before that medivac patient gets in the back of a C-17, he was likely brought to Bagram (or possibly Kandahar) in a C-130 or a Blackhawk. This article leaves me just a bit peeved. But then again, I flew on 77 combat missions in C-130s out of Bagram and back, all too many times with patients in the back.
4 posted on 03/16/2007 5:19:04 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

And we need lots more of it ...


5 posted on 03/16/2007 6:10:42 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Not for nothing but:

DUH!

6 posted on 03/16/2007 6:18:11 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (We stand on the bridge and no one may pass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

Yes! Which makes this latest round of BRAC cuts even more illogical. My unit is losing it's C-130's, as are several others. Not sure how they plan to replace that capacity. Our guys were used in theater for a solid 4 years, non-stop. And that was with 40 year-old models.


7 posted on 03/16/2007 7:22:08 PM PDT by ODC-GIRL (Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ODC-GIRL
Yes! Which makes this latest round of BRAC cuts even more illogical. My unit is losing it's C-130's, as are several others. Not sure how they plan to replace that capacity. Our guys were used in theater for a solid 4 years, non-stop. And that was with 40 year-old models.

I was there when the MIANG C-130s were there. I loved it, because we didn't have to interfly! I always hated flying on planes from other units because they always had some weird thing about them that made our jobs more difficult. But, still sorry to see that you're losing your planes.

8 posted on 03/16/2007 8:45:53 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

Glad to hear things like this. We've got great people, who are very dedicated and love their jobs.

We are converting to KC-135's, a whole new mission. In a few more years, we'll be losing our F-16's and getting A-10's. Keeping life REAL interesting.


9 posted on 03/16/2007 10:06:10 PM PDT by ODC-GIRL (Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson