Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Organ Harvesting Before "Brain-Death" Increasingly Common, Concerned Doctors Warn
LifeSiteNews ^ | 3/21/07 | Gudrun Schultz

Posted on 03/21/2007 4:14:25 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: wagglebee
Who didn't see this coming the moment that the medical-ethics committees coined the phrase "harvesting organs"?
21 posted on 03/21/2007 5:03:20 PM PDT by Covenantor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
So should one be able to TAKE life because he is worthy? Sorry, God gave us the ability to save lives as a blessing. Your route is the arrogance to judge who is worthy. You would allow someone that could be saved to die because he did not sign your paper? You think that would please God?
22 posted on 03/21/2007 5:05:44 PM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Boy am I ever going to get back at these dirty vultures; when they use my organs it will be the Mother of all Recalls.


23 posted on 03/21/2007 5:14:32 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal

People who sign donor Cards please God Everyday.

My Card is signed.



How about yours?






24 posted on 03/21/2007 5:17:39 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
"They are going to be dead, but we should be honest and say that we're starting to remove the organs a few minutes before they meet the legal definition of death."

No, be honest and say that you are killing sick patients for their organs.

25 posted on 03/21/2007 5:24:22 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
That would be an entirely sound definition.
26 posted on 03/21/2007 6:31:37 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Ping 2


27 posted on 03/21/2007 6:51:06 PM PDT by cgk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Who on this thread has experience in health care, particularly transplantation?

I am an RN with 25 years of surgery experience. I have seen the "harvesting" side of organ transplantation. I refuse to be assigned to any "harvests." I will not sign the donor section of my driver's liscense. I discourage anyone who desires to be a donor.

To compare what they do with the Communist Chinese is shameful.

The donor is brought to the operating room on a ventilator. His heart is beating. Often times the donor will move his arms and legs, and may open and close his eyes. He is physically alive.

The donor is not given an anesthetic. The anethesologist's purpose is to keep the patient oxygenated until the heart is removed.

I have seen, when the inscision is made, donors move their arms and legs. Their blood pressure rises, an indication of feeling pain. The night that a donor's right arm broke free of its restraint, and he grabbed the surgeon in the rear end, was my final time to aid and abet the "harvesting" of organs.

So, you decide if the comparison is appropriate. I think so.

If any of you ethically are against transplantation, have the courage just to come out and say it

I am morally and ethically opposed to the "harvesting" of the internal organs for transplantation whether following brain death or cardiac death.

instead of trying to demonize and stigmatize the dedicated, principled and hard working people who often devote their lives to this specialty.

I am certain that there are these people that you describe. However, from seeing the "harvesting" side, all I can say is that calling them vultures is too good of a term.

I worked evenings in the OR of a trauma center. Often times we would be at full capacity with trauma victims. When the organ procurement coordinators were ready, they would demand that we provide them with a room and personnel. They have had the audacity to tell the surgeons to finish up so that they could have the room. They call in the hospital administration if they don't get their way.

The surgeons that I have experience with do it because it is easy money. One surgeon, who only removes the kidneys, brags that he gets $1000.00 per kidney. It takes him less than 2 hours. He likes to boast that it is the easiest $1000.00 per hour he will ever make.

I could go on and on with my experiences. What it comes down to is money. That is big money for the hospitals, the surgeons, the procurement organizations, research scientists, etc.

Guess who doesn't get in on this windfall? The donor and his family. Even the bare minimum for funereal expenses is not provided to the family. Afterall, it's a donation, the gift of life.

28 posted on 03/21/2007 8:17:51 PM PDT by pipeorganman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Who on this thread has experience in health care, particularly transplantation?

I am a physician who trained at UCLA, home of America's busiest liver transplant program. I just read pipeorganman's posting, which described the harvesting of organs. From the other side, I saw the UCLA liver transplant team offer living related donor transplants to children. This was almost a decade after living related donor transplant surgery had been pioneered at the University of Chicago, and after Chicago and programs started by people who had trained at Chicago developed a 95% survival rate.

At UCLA, the surgical residents on the transplant service said, when the patients were not around, that the living related survival rate was 0%. According to them, every child who got a liver at UCLA from a living donor died. Again, this was well after 95% survival rates had been established elsewhere. The UCLA residents used to joke that the mortality rate was only half of what it could have been; after all, the donors generally survived the surgery.

On a related note, this was the same group that performed a liver transplant on Mickey Mantle, but happened not to notice that Mantle had such severe pre-existing cancer that he (Mantle) died soon after the transplant. Ahem.
29 posted on 03/21/2007 9:22:23 PM PDT by Jubal Harshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Oh yeah. The head of the UCLA transplant program, Dr. Busatil, was the only doctor I've ever heard of who was on "lifestyles of the rich and famous." He made a fortune (apparently millions) from doing liver transplants, even when the recipients died, and even when other groups had much higher survival rates.


30 posted on 03/21/2007 9:24:01 PM PDT by Jubal Harshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Politics aside, this is actually getting to be a real problem. Transplant teams are getting increasingly aggressive about trying to obtain organs. Just last year, doctors in this state beat back an attempt to lobby to change the state laws to make this sort of thing easier.

I'm a firm believer in not giving people an incentive to do the wrong thing. If you check in to a hospital without your organ donor card signed, nobody stands to benefit from your death. If you check in with it signed, however, it's a different story.

Based on what I've seen to date, I'd have to recommend that people consider not donating organs.


31 posted on 03/21/2007 9:25:34 PM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Here's and easy solution:

Make Organ Donation a closed loop system. Only those people who have signed Donor Cards will be eligible to receive organs. Those who refuse to sign Donor Cards will have lowest priority when organs become available.


I have no problem with that. Given what I've seen and heard from some of my colleagues who work in this field, I'll take my chances with the ones I have.
32 posted on 03/21/2007 9:39:12 PM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm


33 posted on 03/22/2007 3:52:35 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Which is why I no longer sign as an organ donor. There is to much incentive to call you "dead" so your organs can be harvested.


34 posted on 03/22/2007 4:31:59 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Battle Axe

I'm sorry -- prayers offered for you and your mom.


35 posted on 03/22/2007 4:53:55 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (If MY people who are called by MY name -- the ball's in our court, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

I have no problem with people donating their organs; however, there are ways to do it without the standard organ donor card. If it is specified in an advance medical directive that is specifically drawn up for you by an attorney based on YOUR wishes, with guidelines that YOU dictate, it works.

But, if you are using standard boilerplate forms put out by the hospitals then you are probably in trouble.


36 posted on 03/22/2007 5:15:44 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Actually, yes. But I would not deny someone because they had not.


37 posted on 03/22/2007 5:18:29 AM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That is what foetal stem cell harvesting is all about- establishing the principle that living persons can be killed for the benefit of other living persons. That is why a procedure with few demonstrated benefits compared to adult stem cells and amniotic stem cells, etc, from which many benefits are being developed, is promoted so fanatically and why the insistence on government funding. Ultimately it is to be some government agency that is to determine which humans will be killed for the benefit of which other humans.


38 posted on 03/22/2007 5:33:33 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Your attitudes would be useful in China. You could serve humanity by helping to harvest organs from living patients so that they will be in better condition for transplant. You don't even need to be a doctor. They need folks to hold the patients still. Or are you hoping to make the procedure more open in America?


39 posted on 03/22/2007 5:38:52 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Perhaps you will have an early opportunity to serve humanity.


40 posted on 03/22/2007 5:40:28 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson