So, Rudy says in a CNN interview on December 2, 1999 when asked about BANNING partial birth abortion, "No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing," and you have the gall to call me a liar?!
http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Rudy_Giuliani_Abortion.htm
But I notice yet again that no Rudybots are willing to give an honest answer to the question posed in #60.
Abortion
Rudy Giuliani supports reasonable restrictions on abortion such as parental notification with a judicial bypass and a ban on partial birth abortion – except when the life of the mother is at stake. He’s proud that adoptions increased 66% while abortions decreased over 16% in New York City when he was Mayor. But Rudy understands that this is a deeply personal moral dilemma, and people of good conscience can disagree respectfully. Ultimately he believes that it is a decision between a woman, her doctor, her family, and her God.
http://www.joinrudy2008.com/index.php?section=2&pageid=98
This question from #60? Likely no one's bothered to answer because it's completely asinine. It's like asking, "Would you support...?"
- A candidate who has a DUI and a long history of subastance abuse, including cocaine.
- A candidate who believes in amnesty for illegal aliens, and who won't lift a finger to control the borders, even facing an ongoing terrorist threat.
- A candidate who won't veto the most outrageous spending increases in the history of the nation, or stand up to the opposition party as they wreck the nation.
- A candidate who will send our troops into combat, tying their hands with a strict ROE, and then leave them to the wolves in the media and JAG at the first hint of trouble.
If that's all you have to go off of, then you're pretty much baiting for one answer, so you can jump up and yell "GOTCHA!". It's cheap theatrics, at best, but hardly the caliber of debate that will actually change anyone's mind.