Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the Falklands War was won
The Daily Telegraph ^ | 27/03/2007 | Michael Novak

Posted on 03/27/2007 5:46:57 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

How the Falklands War was won By Michael Novak Last Updated: 1:03pm BST 27/03/2007

The opening phases of the Falklands Conflict began in December 1981 when more than 40 Argentine "scrap metal workers" landed on the island of South Georgia, pointedly refusing to report to the British base at Grytviken to have their entry visas stamped.

Project Alpha was a deliberate operation designed by the new military junta of Gen Leopoldo Galtieri to test British will ahead of Project Azul, a full-scale invasion of the Falkland Islands.

The Argentinians eventually left but returned on March 19, 1982 - this time raising the Argentinian flag - and the Royal Navy survey ship Endurance was dispatched to South Georgia with a small detachment of Royal Marines to eject them.

UK media reports of Royal Navy nuclear submarines on their way to the Falklands panicked the junta into ordering a modified invasion force to depart on March 28. It was not in fact until a day later that three British submarines left Gibraltar for the south Atlantic.

The limited Argentine force, which included only 900 ground troops, was bound to be too strong for the 68 Royal Marines stationed in the Falklands capital Port Stanley.

The Argentinians landed on the morning of April 2 and swiftly overcame the British commandos, a situation mirrored in South Georgia, which fell a day later.

The initial feeling among Margaret Thatcher's advisers was that diplomacy was the only way out, sending an expeditionary force 8,000 miles south was a perilous business and one to be avoided at all costs.

But senior figures within the armed forces disagreed. Sir Henry Leach, the First Sea Lord, told Mrs Thatcher that failure to retake the islands would leave the UK impotent on the world stage and she needed little persuasion that he was right.

The popular mood was firmly behind the British prime minister. It seemed to most people that a set of tin-pot south American dictators renowned for their willingness to resort to torture were lording it over British citizens and territory and that something must be done.

Mrs Thatcher announced the dispatch of a task force to the Falklands, with the initial elements, including the aircraft carriers Hermes and Invincible, departing Portsmouth almost immediately.

The speed with which the Task Force got underway was astonishing. By April 8, the rapidly refitted cruise liner Canberra departed Southampton with 2,000 paratroopers and commandos on board, the docksides crowded with well-wishers waving the Union Flag.

Then, as now, the navy was facing extensive cuts and the assault ship Intrepid had to be brought back into commission rapidly to take part in the race south.

With the British task force heading towards the Falklands, there was a flurry of feverish but ultimately pointless diplomatic negotiations led by Alexander Haig, the US Secretary of State.

Meanwhile, British commandos and special forces retook South Georgia; the UK declared a 200-nautical mile exclusion zone around the islands; and President Ronald Reagan threw US military support behind the British.

On May 1, British special forces landed on West and East Falkland to recce landing sites while the RAF and the Fleet Air Arm attacked Port Stanley airfield, destroying four Argentinian aircraft but failing to shut down the runway.

A day later the Royal Navy submarine Conqueror sank the Argentinian cruiser General Belgrano, with the loss of 323 lives, leading Admiral Jorge Anaya to order his ships back to port.

The decision to sink the Belgrano - famously welcomed by the Sun with the headline Gotcha - caused much controversy. But there was little doubt her Exocet missiles were a threat to the British task force much of which was already in the region.

The threat from the Exocets was confirmed two days later on May 4, when the British destroyer Sheffield was hit in "bomb alley" south-east of the Falklands with the loss of 20 lives.

She was the first Royal Navy ship lost in action since 1945 and in London the successful Argentinian attack briefly rocked the war cabinet but with little choice it held firm.

Early on May 21, troops from 2 and 3 Bns of the Parachute Regiment, plus marines from 40, 42 and 45 Royal Marine Commandos landed virtually unopposed to form the main bridgehead at San Carlos on the western coast of East Falkland.

Three days later and the Argentinians enjoyed another short-lived success when the destroyer Coventry was hit by three bombs, capsized and sank with the loss of 19 of her crew while the roll-on roll-off ferry the Atlantic Conveyor was sunk by an Exocet, killing 12.

On May 26, 2 Para set off to the south to mount a surprise attack on Darwin and Goose Green and the next day 3 Para and 45 Commando headed east towards Port Stanley.

There was much attention focused back in Britain on the fact that the commandos called their forced march a "yomp" while the paras were "tabbing", making a "tactical advance to battle".

With the BBC World service announcing that a British parachute battalion was poised to take Goose Green, Lt-Col "H" Jones, the CO of 2 Para, realized all hope of a surprise attack was lost and ordered his men to attack that night.

Despite being outnumbered three to one, they won the battle but Jones was killed and was subsequently awarded a posthumous VC.

The last Argentinian success of the conflict came on June 8 when the landing ships Sir Galahad and Sir Tristram were attacked by Argentine aircraft at Bluff Cove, killing 48, mainly members of the Welsh Guards who were being landed to join the battle for Stanley.

With the Scots and Welsh Guards now joining the force, having been ferried down on the requisitioned QE2, a substantial British force of 8,000 men was now lined up against the Argentinians.

The first phase of the assault on Stanley began on June 11, with 45 Commando attacking Two Sisters, screaming the company war cry Zulu, Zulu and forcing the Argentinians to flee with the loss of only four British marines.

Meanwhile 42 Commando lost only one man in capturing Mt Harriet and Goat Fudge. The fiercest fighting came in 3 Para's assault on Mt Longdon just five miles west of the Falklands capital. The young Argentinian soldiers stood and fought.

The paras lost 18 men in the battle and when they eventually reached the top of the mountain they found one of their own Sgt Ian McKay surrounded by dead Argentinians. He was the second British soldier to be awarded a posthumous VC for his part in the conflict.

The second phase of the assault followed on June 14 with the Gurkhas taking Mount William and 2 Para attacking Wireless Ridge backed up by heavy shelling from their own artillery and naval guns. They lost only three men and found more than 100 Argentinian bodies.

But the fiercest hand to hand fighting came on Tumbledown, taken by the Scots Guards with the loss of seven men to around 30 Argentinians killed.

With the British troops now poised to take Stanley itself, the Argentinian commander Brig-Gen Mario Menendez surrendered, thoroughly vindicating Mrs Thatcher's courageous decision to ignore her advisers and retake the Falklands.

TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 1982; argentina; britain; exocet; falklands; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki

I remember when the Faulkland war was fought. A British "Vulcan" bomber had been in a local aircraft museum for a long time (I remember seeing it for as long as I can remember). Some British technicians flew in and spent a couple of weeks getting it ready to fly. Then it flew out of here to augment the warplanes being used in the Faulkland war.

I understand that they used something like 8 bombers for each mission of one or two that actually dropped bombs. They would use the others as tankers, carrying no bombs, but carrying as much fuel as possible. They would leave from England and some would refuel the others then turn around and head for home. Only the last one or two would make it all the way.

What a way to fight a war.

41 posted on 03/27/2007 6:34:37 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
This should be widely read by not only Tony Blair, but also the British citizens and their representatives. Britain has cut its military severely and is no the verge of cutting it even more. Soon, if this trend continues, Britain truly will not have the ability to project force and will only be able to use harsh language.
42 posted on 03/27/2007 6:35:14 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

They have 2 active light carriers,with one mothballed.The problem is that these have little real airdefence capability after having retired their SeaHarrier fleet.

43 posted on 03/27/2007 6:35:29 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent

I recently saw a show about the war on the military channel. I was just as impressed with the logistical aspect of it as I was with the actual combat.

44 posted on 03/27/2007 6:36:35 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator

Argentinians were extremly brave pilots, one even tried to attack carrier with Pucara.

A-4s could do much serious damege if they hade Maverick missiles or even older Bullpup missiles.

With 20-30 Exocets Etendars could sink carriers. and if based on Falklands Brits wouldnt even get near falklands.

45 posted on 03/27/2007 6:36:52 AM PDT by kronos77 ( and Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

I don't remember any but I expect Spanish language TV had one or two in BA.

46 posted on 03/27/2007 6:37:25 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (Hajjis HATE the waterboard! It can turn a clam into a canary so fast Harry Potter would be jealous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

The reason the Brits won in the Falklands was because when push comes to shove, Tommy can fight.

The British soldier can be one of the most stubborn stalwarts when the chips are down.

The UK politicos and civie heathen may be weak and feckless, but Tommy can fight.

47 posted on 03/27/2007 6:40:09 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

48 posted on 03/27/2007 6:40:26 AM PDT by kronos77 ( and Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

You almost get the impression that the Argentinians had no military plans beyond taking the islands.

49 posted on 03/27/2007 6:40:38 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

I ask because I was just wondering how the MSM dealt with the Argentinian propaganda.

50 posted on 03/27/2007 6:42:20 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kronos77
Messrs. Hitler & Mussolini harbored the same doubts.
51 posted on 03/27/2007 6:42:29 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

No they didnt.
Something liek NATO and Kosovo war.

52 posted on 03/27/2007 6:43:12 AM PDT by kronos77 ( and Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Presidetn Reagan gave the Brits full access to our satellite reconaissance and NSA intercept capabilities.

53 posted on 03/27/2007 6:44:43 AM PDT by ken5050 (The 2008 winning ticket: Rudy/Newtie, with Hunter for SecDef, Pete King at DHS, Bill Simon at Treas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

You are a complete idiot.

54 posted on 03/27/2007 6:45:41 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
So know one was buying the Argentinian claim that they were just liberating the islands from European imperialism?

I got to know some Argintinian girls when I was in Grad School. They thoroughly believed that the Falklands are theirs and that the British took them by force from Argentina over a century ago. The invasion was simply reclaiming their historic territory. This propaganda is still the standard inn that country.

55 posted on 03/27/2007 6:48:42 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Roumur is that Soviets backed Argentinians and Brits with Satellite imagery. That position of Belgrano was given to Brits and Position of fleet to Argentinians.

56 posted on 03/27/2007 6:49:58 AM PDT by kronos77 ( and Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kronos77
You sure don't like the Brits. If you were talking this way about the French, you would get a lot more support on this board.

The Brits probably showed restraint by not actually sinking all Argentinian ships and blockading Argentinian ports via use of their nuclear submarines. They could have militarily - leftist and un pressure would have been enormous against it - kept this up for years.

57 posted on 03/27/2007 6:52:52 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
I'm sure George Lucas did as well.

If not, I'll part with mine for a price :-)

58 posted on 03/27/2007 6:54:18 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (?El proletariado del mundo, une! - Xuygo Chavez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta


I give one to the Brits,
Will to go across the globe and fight for land of their own.

And Nope,
I dont lik ebrits or French.

59 posted on 03/27/2007 6:54:47 AM PDT by kronos77 ( and Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Thanks for the post. I forgot that the 25th anniversary was almost here.

If anyone's interested in a computer simulation game of the Falklands War, try this:

I have a copy and have played several of the scenarios. It's more simulation than game, and fairly complex. It's an excellent study in infantry tactics, given the absence of vehicles and air power from most scenarios. The system is similar to the JANUS software, which the US Army uses to train its leaders.

If anyone wants an opponent for this sim, email me. I'll play.

60 posted on 03/27/2007 6:55:42 AM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson