Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK Ready for Diplomatic Attack on Iran
NewsMax ^ | March 31, 2007 | Stewart Stogel

Posted on 03/30/2007 7:36:50 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The Security Council "statement" criticizing Iran's continued "detention" of 15 British Royal Navy sailors is only the first step in what may turn into a major diplomatic attack by London, say U.N. diplomats.

The watered-down statement, unexpectedly accepted by British Ambassador to the U.N. Sir Emyr Jones Parry late Thursday, while criticizing the Iranian move, only demanded immediate access to the soldiers by British consular officials.

It did not address the claims and counter-claims about whether the Royal Navy violated Iran's territorial waters.

However, on Monday, the UK assumes the monthly rotating presidency of the Security Council, followed by the United States in May.

During April, London will be able to control the Council's "program of work," putting itself in a central position to use the U.N. body to exert even more diplomatic pressure on Tehran.

The feeling among Council diplomats was that the Thursday statement on Iran was approved by the British not so much for what it said, but more for use as a "springboard" for harsher measures should they be needed while it chairs the U.N. body.

Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton again told Fox News on Friday that the U.N. "must move beyond press statements."

Bolton told FNC that a second video of a British sailor "admitting" trespassing into Iranian waters was yet "another example" of Iran's defiance of international laws.

While the issue of additional sanctions on the Islamic Republic has not yet been discussed inside the Security Council, it may, should the standoff continue well into April.

It is no secret that the White House intends to make Iran the number one issue if the crisis has not been resolved by May.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 15sailorsandmarines; bluff; diplomacy; hostagecrisis; hostages; iran; johnbolton2008; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Ieatfrijoles

It's also possible the Iranians are using the hostages to stave off an attack they knew was coming.


21 posted on 03/30/2007 8:06:46 PM PDT by reardensteel (Finally an Israel that will stand up and fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reardensteel

The cookie pushers will start throwing cookies..and maybe their purse also..


22 posted on 03/30/2007 8:08:49 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
I hate to see the UK go through this

It is awful to watch, I'll grant you, but it seems necessary. I just hope the Brits take away the right lessons from this. If they want not to be pushed around in the future, they are going to have to change their ways.

23 posted on 03/30/2007 8:12:16 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This brings this quote from Gladiator to mind:
"Falco: I have been told of a certain sea snake which has a very unusual method of attracting its prey. It will lie at the bottom of the ocean as if wounded. Then its enemies will approach, and yet it will lie quite still. And then its enemies will take little bites of it, and yet it remains still.
Commodus: So, we will lie still, and let our enemies come to us and nibble."

Could this why we allow Iran to act as it has?


24 posted on 03/30/2007 8:21:59 PM PDT by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Well, technically...

The number three guy for that throne is going over there, and technically he is ranked as a lieutenent in their "calvary scout" troop...

He could "technically" pull rank, and lead the Brits on a rampage that might catch the goobers off guard...Technically...

Practically...Well, thats another story...

I'm not going to waste a bag of popcorn waiting for anything decisive to happen anytime soon...


25 posted on 03/30/2007 8:29:14 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
What on earth is a diplomatic attack?

It's the "weak sister" of a "nonbinding resolution."

26 posted on 03/30/2007 8:31:12 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (Chuck Hagel makes Joe Biden look like a statesman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

"Diplomatic attack": a weenie oxymoron.


27 posted on 03/30/2007 8:32:39 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It's obvious that Iran is trying to get the west to attack them. What did they do, buy a couple nukes from Pakistan? Russia?


28 posted on 03/30/2007 8:34:24 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Ummmmm . . . . . . . . what?

No, seriously, . . . . . . . . . what!!??


29 posted on 03/30/2007 8:42:45 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Thatcher was the last true “Brit”.


30 posted on 03/30/2007 8:49:35 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What exactly is a "diplomatic attack"? Isn't that an oxymoron? One uses diplomacy when one doesn't attack. I have questions.

What is the expected lethality of a diplomatic attack? Will it spare the infrastructure? Will it spread fallout? What is the maximum range? Kill radius?

31 posted on 03/30/2007 8:50:27 PM PDT by Sender (All warfare is based on deception.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

"What on earth is a diplomatic attack?"

Bending farther over, French style.


32 posted on 03/30/2007 9:05:22 PM PDT by CountryBumpkin (Don't get dropped into the liberal thunk tank. Use the brain God gave you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

It's the next step following "harsh words".


33 posted on 03/30/2007 9:12:47 PM PDT by 38special (I mean come'on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 38special

John Bolton again told Fox News on Friday that the U.N. "must move beyond press statements."
I lov ethat guy ...Sad day for the once mighty British .


34 posted on 03/30/2007 9:18:26 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

It's a volley of incentive packages designed to bring the enemy to his knees laughing his ass off.


35 posted on 03/30/2007 9:30:03 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: devolve

 

FINALE
 

36 posted on 03/30/2007 10:13:02 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Like the Boosh "virtual fence"

LOL!


37 posted on 03/30/2007 10:14:12 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary, if you want America finished off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
What on earth is a diplomatic attack?

It's metrosexual. Cover your eyes.

LMAO

38 posted on 03/30/2007 10:22:17 PM PDT by Khepri (Sure, we want to go home. The shortest way home is through Damascus and Teheran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"However, on Monday, the UK assumes the monthly rotating presidency of the Security Council, followed by the United States in May."

 Bookmark
 

39 posted on 03/30/2007 10:23:51 PM PDT by scratcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

this should be over soon - those diplomatic attack always make the muslims shake in their shoes.


40 posted on 03/30/2007 10:24:29 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson