Posted on 03/30/2007 7:36:50 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
tit for tat..........ooooh!
I'm sure that idiot Jimmy Carter would think it's too harsh.
One analysis I read seemed to think it was partially designed to drive a wedge between the US and the UK.
The US wants to get agressive with Iran, the UK now will want not rock the boat...we are potted against one another...
Another theory, human shields at the nuke sites...again, the wedge comes into play...
Iran already have nukes? Perhaps...
Although I'd think it has more to do with they think were are spread thin militarily, are now cash strapped ala bin Laden's idea (which was originally our idea against the USSR, and got word from Pelosi that she had enough votes to set a timeline for withdrawal thereby giving them the green light...
"A couple of nukes from Pakistan" would just get the Islamic world destroyed. Any Navy boomer sailors out there want to describe to us what a full load of Trident MIRV'd SLBMs would do to Iran? From just one boat, not all of them.
While Britain makes their diplomatic attack, our gas prices keep rising, Iran making 10 mil. a day off the increase & some reports say it won't stop soon, could be at $5/gallon if this keeps up!!!
Their government is weak and they want to make themselves a financial beneficiary of "Western aggression".
Failing dirt-holes like Iran are just the kind of places where all blood sucking Democrats are spawned.
Silly man. LMSS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.