Actually, I hate to say it, but this piece is virtually unreadable. He's a lousy writer (maybe because English isn't his primary language). And there's really no argument at all. Just faked up astonishment that ANYONE could possibly question the General Theory of Evolution.
There's nothing here to argue with, because there's no argument to refute. Just mush.
He said: "Ann Coulter is not a scientist"
EVOLOTION IS NOT A SCIENCE - IT'S A THEORY!!
Yup, fake astonishment that anyone could question the THEORY of evolution. And definitely hard to follow.
"There's nothing here to argue with, because there's no argument to refute. Just mush."
Then of course it gets put in the news activism section.
Strange, I read it all the way through. Given the length, wouldn't that be virtually impossible if, as you say, it is virtually unreadable? The jape is somewhat funny but uneven, too much work probably to carry it all the way through.
That's his editor's fault, IMO.