Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Milhous Clinton
Pittsburgh Tribune Review ^ | April 1, 2007 | Tony Blankley

Posted on 04/01/2007 9:26:59 AM PDT by FairOpinion

Edited on 04/02/2007 3:46:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

With every passing week it's more likely that Hillary Clinton will be the Democrats' nominee for president. This thought alone should provide the strongest possible motivation for Republicans to get their acts together.

Polls showing half the country won't vote for Hillary should be discounted. The choice on Election Day won't be Hillary or not Hillary; it will be Hillary or someone else.


(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; electionpresident; elections; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: llevrok

"I want her to get the nomination so much I can taste it.

Besides good political fun, her failed candidacy will crush the Clinton Mafia once and for all."

You're a gambler! I didn't want her husband to win his primary, didn't want him to be President, didnt want him to survive impeachment, didn't want Hillary to be senator, don't want her to win the primary and her winning the presidency is UNTHINKABLE.

We haven't stopped them yet.


21 posted on 04/01/2007 10:12:51 AM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABELER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Mrs. Bill Clinton will do anything to get elected; but we know that.


22 posted on 04/01/2007 10:17:04 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Do no wish for her to win the nomination..they will CHEAT at the ballot box, and dare us to disenfranchise BLACK voters.


23 posted on 04/01/2007 10:21:09 AM PDT by Tees Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tees Mom

If she gets the nomination, which IMO is a slam dunk & she were to lose the general, watch out for the revolt. Now if she wins & this is truly in the relm of possibility you can see the pubbies sitting on their fat a$$es & allowing her to rule. This is why I say the game is fixed in favor of communism/socialism & these elites in CONgress don't give a darn about the people. From that point of view I'll take only Tancredo or Hunter who seemed to be on our sde. The rest are quit compromised. Ergo, these two are villified while the others are uplifted. Hopefully, Fred or Newt can be the compromise.


24 posted on 04/01/2007 10:46:40 AM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Aria
didn't mind the high taxes because she thought she got great services in return (had 2 kids for free).

Now, come on. The first part of your statement says that the kids were not really free, were they?

25 posted on 04/01/2007 10:51:56 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: There You Go Again

WE will probably have to go the whole socialist way to ruin before enough people wake up to what has happened

I agree with you except for the "enough people wake up" part. Many don't want to "wake up"...

And I will add one very important fact: when one or two generations have been born into and lived with socialism they can't 'wake up' because they have nothing to which they can compare anything. Hence, there is nothing for them to 'wake up' to because it isn't even on their radar screen, so to speak. Having been to Russia when it was still the USSR, I can guarantee you that one to three generations born and raised under this 'system' produces masses of brain-dead followers and no leaders.


26 posted on 04/01/2007 10:53:54 AM PDT by hardworking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

My opinion of Vilsack couldn't go any lower. I will feel the same towards every other politico that sells their soul to Mrs. Clinton.
Lucre is unbecoming.


27 posted on 04/01/2007 10:55:28 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger

If she gets the nomination, which IMO is a slam dunk & she were to lose the general, watch out for the revolt.

IMO the AlBore Florida 'thing' was just a 'test drive' for the Clintoons, forcing a national election into the arena they love...the courts. Any defeat of Hitlery will be dragged into court and our national elections will forever more be decided by the Supreme Court rather than the Constitution electoral college. Remember the famous quote of Bubba about the impeachment: "Well then we'll just have to win". Legal battles to 'win' are the lifeblood of the Clintoon machine. In their mind, Hitlery WILL become POTUS and no one can stop them or their tactics.


28 posted on 04/01/2007 10:59:21 AM PDT by hardworking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus Reagan

Well, yeah - you're right...but she thought they were free. As i recall she had home visits from a nurse to check on how she and the baby were doing. There actually were services that I never got here.

Politically I disagree with her totally. We can't even discuss politics. I'm the oldest child and she and her husband are both the youngest and I wonder if that has anything to do with it.


29 posted on 04/01/2007 11:02:13 AM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABELER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

btt


30 posted on 04/01/2007 11:02:44 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I'm glad Smellovision never got off the ground...


31 posted on 04/01/2007 11:36:54 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aria

The servics that European countries are able to afford comes at the control of the aristocratc elite - who don't really beleive in democracy - as well as the fact that defense spending is an afterthought because of the American promise for protection. Except maybe the UK.


32 posted on 04/01/2007 12:32:32 PM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (I don't care what side of the debate you are on: Weather is not Climate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

If anyone out there doesn't think she can win, just stand back and watch. The very idea that this woman actually COULD be our next president terrifies me!


AMERICA LOVES HILLARY; TOP FUNDRAISER FOR ROUND ONE: $36 MILLION
Sun Apr 01 2007 13:28:02 ET

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm

Total includes $26 million raised since Jan 20, $10 million transferred from successful senate reelection campaign

Hillary Clinton's campaign today announced it will report $36 million in total receipts for the first fundraising quarter, which ended March 31, 2007. The staggering number reflects the strength of support for Clinton from every walk of life and every part of America.

"We are overwhelmed by the tremendous enthusiasm and historic response this campaign has received so far," campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle said today. "Going forward we are poised to continue this success and make even more history."

Specifically, the campaign noted several key numbers demonstrating the overwhelming depth and breadth of Clinton's support:

$26 million raised in new receipts since launching her campaign on January 20

80 % of the contributions were $100 or less.

$4.2 million raised on the internet (including $1 million in a week during the One Week, One Million campaign, and nearly $600,000 online in the 36 hours preceding the deadline)

$6 million in total grassroots donations (internet plus direct mail and telemarketing receipts)

50,000 donors (tens of thousands of them new donors)

Contributions received from residents of all 50 states (plus Washington, DC)

$10 million transferred from Senator Clinton's successful senate reelection account

In March of 2003, the highest total reported by a Democratic campaign in its first-quarter fundraising report was $7.4 million and the top four candidates combined raised just over $23 million. In March of 1999, incumbent Vice President Al Gore reported $8.9 million for his first quarter.


33 posted on 04/01/2007 1:03:27 PM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; All
Don't underestimate Hillary, the Clinton machinery and the Democrats.

Bears repeating!

34 posted on 04/01/2007 1:07:40 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

They're fresh from a big victory in 2006. Judging from their attitudes, they feel that controlling the White House and both houses of Congress is their God-given right. We'd better get ready.


35 posted on 04/01/2007 1:27:30 PM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bryan

You got that right.


36 posted on 04/01/2007 1:36:08 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
These numbers sure look impressive. But I'm puzzled by the countercurrent of high negative numbers for "the princess of darkeness" I'm certainly not alone.

Is it possible the Clinton Fundraising Machine (CFM) is using strategy 151( greenbacks from Buddist monks ). My guess is..laundered money. Maybe the Indians in Bangalore, or perhaps, an offshore private equity group, or the good old Chinese.

37 posted on 04/01/2007 2:19:32 PM PDT by free from tyranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: free from tyranny

The Hillary Machine is getting more than enough money from legitimate sources. By the time we vote in November 2008, she will have raised hundreds of millions of dollars. And while I don't doubt for a moment that such schemes are not beneath her, she won't break the law if she doesn't feel that she has to.


38 posted on 04/01/2007 3:24:05 PM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
Socialism has at least three great flaws: 1. It requires a totalitarian state to impose it and keep it in place.

europe , canada??

39 posted on 04/01/2007 3:51:22 PM PDT by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bryan
LAWS? What laws are you speaking of? The laws for you and me and the other 300,000,000 Americans. These laws do not apply to her. They do not apply to her league of democrats as well.
40 posted on 04/01/2007 5:17:20 PM PDT by free from tyranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson