Posted on 04/01/2007 1:40:37 PM PDT by DuncanWaring
Ping
"A well-schooled electorate, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and read books, shall not be infringed.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Fahrenheit 451.......
Guns don't kill people -- liberals do
Look at how many people Communism (liberism spelled differently) has killed 94 million people (reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Book_of_Communism ).
20 million in the Soviet Union, 65 million in the People's Republic of China, 1 million in Vietnam, 2 million in North Korea, 2 million in Cambodia, 1 million in the Communist states of Eastern Europe, 150,000 in Latin America, 1.7 million in Africa, 1.5 million in Afghanistan and 10,000 deaths
liberism = liberalism
BTTT
Guns are too the 2nd what bibles and polical speech is too the Frist.
Books can kill.
Das Capital, Mein Kampf..the Koran
Not the books, the ideas.
Some people need killin.
Hobophobia?
Do you mean Hoplophobia?
I could not agree more and you have done an excellent job.
Take a breath and lets go one step further...
"NORCO, Calif. (AP) -- More than 10 commercial quality sound amplification units and a cache of unregistered recordings were found at a former citizens's home after intermittent loud noises forced a neighborhood watchdog group to call authorities to investigate, rules enforcement officers said Friday.
"The man tried to run back into the house after investigators arrived with common speech detection devices and had to be restrained by authorities, Riverside County Rules Enforcement Deputy Juan Zamora said.
Neighbors had reported hearing intermittent excerpts of verbal declarations from inside the house. One neighbor reported We all have seen the Registered Speech Offender sign posted at this persons house. We know he is barred for life from ever engaging in public speech or having recorded speech in his possession. That is why we were so alarmed when we heard actual declarations and speech excerpts coming from the house.
Upon arrival Rules Enforcement officers quickly contacted the Instant Background Check Database to verify the individual in the house had a previous Bureau of Speech Devices record of conviction. The Instant Background check revealed a previous felony conviction in 1984 for entering false information on a loan application at a Federal Depositor Insured Collective bank. Upon confirming the Registered Speech Offender status of the perpetrator in the house, BSD SQUAT Team members performed a dynamic entry into the house and secured the individual for the safety of himself and the community.
Rules Enforcement Officer Zamora was quoted as saying we are just so glad we got this former felonious information offender in custody and the speech amplification devices off the streets.
"The man had no permits for the speech amplification devices that were recovered, Zamora said and could not possibly ever legally posses a speech amplification device for the rest of his life due to a felony Information Crime in 1984. Many of the recordings found in the garage were illegal subversive or religious tracts.
"Authorities also found a machine in the garage that was used to actually create speeches. The practice, known as 'recording,' is not itself illegal, BSD spokeswoman Susan Raichel said. She went on to add This is so typical of individuals that have a previous felony Information Crime conviction. They believe that just because a law abiding citizen with no prior felonies or qualifying misdemeanors can obtained a recorded speech permit and with the proper licenses and tax fees carry recorded speech with them in public, that such activities are their right.
"The man, whose identity was not released, was taken to a hospital where he will receive a psychological evaluation prior to trial."
WOW!
Pretty bizarre what we simply accept as normal. Our founding fathers would not see our modern firearms laws as anything but an act of war against American Citizens and would open fire on anyone attempting to enforce such blatantly unconstitutional and treasonous rules without a seconds hesitation. Here is the proof...
George Washington said: (regarding the Bill of Rights) They are the building blocks of the Constitution, and the Second Amendment is the mortar that holds them together.
Thomas Jefferson said: "The constitutions of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property and freedom of the press."
Thomas Jefferson said: "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
James Madison said: "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust people with arms."
Patrick Henry said: "The great object is that every man be armed."
Every time I hear some b.s. about how so and so is a felon and therefor is bared for life from their Second Amendment Right I just want to VOMIT.
Yet the vast majority of otherwise indignant American Citizens gaze with blank stairs as criminally unconstitutional laws that impose a lifetime ban on an individuals Second Amendment Right are dished out on a daily basis. Which of course only emboldens that very same government to expand intrusion into every other aspect of American Citizens private lives and Constitutional Rights. The founding fathers knew uninfringed possession of arms was the ONLY thing that will keep government from engaging in tyranny.
Amazing.
No - I meant the irrational fear of hobos.
Some people have very strong opinions about music.
well duh... stares
Oh oh...Samizdat rears its ugly head!
I didn't know you had to register literary works with the goobermint....
But if the same logic followed for the protected items of the First Amendment as is followed for the protected items of the Second Amendment, you would.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.