Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrey introduces Fairness in Firearms Testing Act
gingrey.house.gov ^ | Mar 30, 2007 | NA

Posted on 04/02/2007 11:21:03 AM PDT by neverdem

gingrey.house.gov

Gingrey Contact: Becky Ruby (202) 225-2931

Gingrey introduces Fairness in Firearms Testing Act Improves accountability in firearm testing

Washington, Mar 30 -

U.S. Congressman Phil Gingrey today introduced H.R. 1791, the Fairness in Firearms Testing Act. This legislation improves consistency and accountability in firearm testing by giving U.S. gun manufactures access to video documentation of their products’ testing at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE). Video documentation will give firearm manufactures the right to contest and review BATFE testing decisions, which are highly inconsistent.

“Currently, BATFE lacks written procedures and clear guidelines for firearm testing,” Gingrey said. “How can we expect firearm manufacturers – or any industry, for that matter – to comply with moving target regulations? The Bureau’s rulings are so inconsistent that BATFE threatened to prosecute one gun manufacturer in Heard County, Georgia not even a year after sending written approval for that company’s product. This runaround is a waste of time and resources. My legislation will help restore accountability to the BATFE testing process and help restore the words ‘made in America’ to our firearms.”

In the past five years, 85 percent of American firearm manufactures have gone out of businesses, largely due to complex and ever-changing regulations. H.R. 1791 is a step toward the goal of formal, written firearm testing guidelines, and helps ensure a level playing ground for both BATFE agents and manufacturers.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: atf; banglist; batfe
85 %?!
1 posted on 04/02/2007 11:21:07 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
2 posted on 04/02/2007 11:25:46 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have two speeds: "graze" and "stampede".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“How can we expect firearm manufacturers – or any industry, for that matter – to comply with moving target regulations?

That's the whole point. Enough regulations, inconsistently interpreted, eventually criminalizes everything.

3 posted on 04/02/2007 11:27:58 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“How can we expect firearm manufacturers – or any industry, for that matter – to comply with moving target regulations?.....In the past five years, 85 percent of American firearm manufactures have gone out of businesses"

That was the goal, the intent, the plan all along.


4 posted on 04/02/2007 11:38:09 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Better yet, defund the BATF.


5 posted on 04/02/2007 12:08:45 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (Pelosi Democrats agree with Al Queda more often than they agree with President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I suspect that the more accurate stat is that 85% of those who were licensed to manufacture firearms 5 years ago are no longer licensed.


6 posted on 04/02/2007 12:28:02 PM PDT by Beelzebubba (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

How about fairness in testing for individual firearms owners? Charging people with posession of a machine gun because the .22LR rifle they owned was a bit warn and would slam fire with very sensitive ammunition and bit of abuse.


7 posted on 04/02/2007 12:35:54 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

MORE BAD NEWS: This is AFTER the Clinton administration has put 70% of all gun DEALERS out of business, from 1994 till the end of his reign.


8 posted on 04/02/2007 1:25:32 PM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Close the BAFTE ~ Now!!


9 posted on 04/02/2007 1:52:43 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Charging people with posession of a machine gun because the .22LR rifle they owned was a bit warn and would slam fire with very sensitive ammunition and bit of abuse.

I would think one could engineer .22LR ammunition that would slam-fire full auto im almost any firearm chambered for the cartridge. Engineering centerfire ammunition to do likewise would probably be a little harder (for something like .357sig, nestle a .380 round inside a shortened .40 case, and include a projection near the back of the case to slam the primer on the .380 round when the mouth hits the end of the chamber). I sure wouldn't want to be near a gun when it was loaded with such ammo, but I think such ammo could be made well enough for BATFE purposes.

10 posted on 04/02/2007 5:18:53 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blackie
And repeal the 1934 act that made machine guns illegal.
If I can carry it or mount it on my car I want it; anyone who says otherwise is a communist retard and should be crucified.

See my tagline.....

11 posted on 04/02/2007 5:34:55 PM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Roger that ~ Bravo Zulu!

Love your tagline!!


12 posted on 04/03/2007 11:42:08 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Charging people with posession of a machine gun because the .22LR rifle they owned was a bit warn and would slam fire with very sensitive ammunition and bit of abuse.

Quite a few .22 rifles will fire when the ejector strikes the rim of an unfired cartridge, as when ejecting a live chambered round, rather than the firing pin.

It's a problem for ammunition manufacturers, who have to carefully combine the sensitivity of the centrifugally-applied priming compound with the hardness of the brass case, either of which can varty between different manufacturing batches.

13 posted on 04/03/2007 12:38:02 PM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson