Skip to comments.
Theoretical cloaking device is created
UPI ^
| 04/03/07
Posted on 04/03/2007 8:44:27 AM PDT by nypokerface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: nypokerface
Well, there go the veils.
2
posted on
04/03/2007 8:46:04 AM PDT
by
Cornpone
(Islam: The world's greatest, preventable and treatable psychosis. ©2006Cornpone)
To: nypokerface
I’d take an Infrared cloak to the field with me, and for the deer-stand I would take the Ultra-violet.
3
posted on
04/03/2007 8:47:28 AM PDT
by
American_Centurion
(No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
To: nypokerface
As it currently exists, it may be able to cloak an object from a laser.
4
posted on
04/03/2007 8:47:51 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: fso301
Somewhere, Nikola Tesla is laughing maniacally.
5
posted on
04/03/2007 8:49:47 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: nypokerface
To: nypokerface
There are other theoretical methods that use other properties of light such as polarization. This approach seems kind of primitive.
7
posted on
04/03/2007 8:51:37 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(3 May '07 3:14 PM)
To: nypokerface
Would someone please slap one of these on Helen Thomas’ face?
To: nypokerface
I’m waiting for the transporter myself.
9
posted on
04/03/2007 8:55:04 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: LibWhacker
The Socialist party already has a
cloaking device (it even blots out the sun):
10
posted on
04/03/2007 9:03:41 AM PDT
by
quark
To: nypokerface
I could never understand why a simple black cloth or “cloak” was never touted as a cloaking device. When all of the object is covered with such a cloth, none of that object can be seen.
When we were kids, in order to be invisible all we had to do was put our hands over our faces.
Scientists make everything soooo complicated.
To: nypokerface; Constitution Day; Tijeras_Slim; Petronski; Fierce Allegiance
To: langleyaction
When all of the object is covered with such a cloth, none of that object can be seen. But the downside is that you still know an object is there. The ultimate "cloak" is to make it appear as if nothing is there.
To: American_Centurion
I was thinking the seal clubbers could really use a suit based on this technology!
14
posted on
04/03/2007 9:08:37 AM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid. It's also WWIV.)
To: nypokerface
well I have a theortical money tree in my back yard and a theoretical title to a bridge in Brooklyn.
To: nypokerface
I’ve got news for them. JK Rowling published data on this in her first Harry Potter book.
16
posted on
04/03/2007 9:11:46 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Hajjis HATE the waterboard! It can turn a clam into a canary so fast Harry Potter would be jealous.)
To: martin_fierro
Nice. Mrs. B. J. Smegma. LOL!
17
posted on
04/03/2007 9:12:37 AM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(One fish, two fish, I want to go catch bluefish.)
To: nypokerface
Here's a picture of the device:
To: Mannaggia l'America
Yeah, but will that device work on Rosie O’s big butt?
To: Mannaggia l'America
Yeah, but will that device work on Rosie O’s big butt?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson