Posted on 04/04/2007 5:58:38 AM PDT by NYC Republican
“Psalm 118:22
The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief corner stone. NASB”
So Wiener thinks he’s the messiah? Explains a lot.
The ‘06 election, for starters
Thanks for posting that list. BTW, where’s the guy that consolidated all of that?
Consider it done! Glad to know you lurk on the Savage thread, however it's not really nice to bash us without pinging us. :-o
To be fair, I pinged TARK... I don’t have access to a Savage ping list.
I can see why Savage would have ticked off strong conservatives yesterday because he appeared to me to be on a bender. As to what prompted that, it's unimportant. He clearly had a bug up his arse yesterday and was being deliberately provocative - he knows that hostile callers give him a better opportunity to indulge in his 'act,' and it makes for great radio.
I will say that basically, Savage's position boils down to two things: 1. wait and see how the Pelosi trip turns out, and don't impute all sorts of bad things to her until we get a more full report, and 2. don't dismiss ideas simply because they come from a dem or a lib. He is right on both counts, though I think he is more right on the latter - liberals can come up with good ideas now and then, and denying them isn't productive at all/
A person who thinks in 1-D doesn't take to this message very well. A person who thinks in 3-D knows it's the best way to approach life.
Really?
You think THAT many people even have access to his show, let alone listen?
How many stations carry his show, how many markets?
Limbaugh is still on 500 stations (I guess) and still probably claims to have an audience of 20 million?
It could be argued that he is far more influential than savage...... yet your position is that savage trew the election to the democrats?
Anything that undermines Bush becomes a talking point for this psycho.
Checkers and I did most of it.
Limbaugh appeals to conservatives, that’s his base. Savage claims to be a conservative, yet spews far more venom and bile towards conservatives and GOPers than he does at anyone else. There’s a huge difference there. Especially in a very divided nation.
No, I posted that verse in regards to the freemasons, who rejected Jesus.
That’s who I was thinking of. Is he still around? Haven’t seen him post for a while
I agree, he wants to be the radio voice of 'independent' conservatives, rather than party line conservatives, which necessitates him going off the reservation now and then.
Savage can call himself whatever he wants. I just call him a nut.
Going off the reservation??? Man, that’s funny. He’s all over the map, many of the things he espouses aren’t remotely conservative.
You're so typical of the run of the mill Savage-hater, distorting the facts to try to make a point.
Glad I'm here to clarify things to others who weren't there. Actually it was Tark who was doing most of the shouting, no one shouted back at him UNTIL he started tossing personal verbal grenades at some of us who didn't sahre his outrage.
And even then it was only ONE poster who shouted back at him for his personal attack, certainly it had nothing to do with Tark's disagreement with Savage as you so inaccurately claim here, and there was no "cult-like" response from any of the Savage thread regulars shouting at Tark, for that matter I was the only one on the thread who agreed with Savage. So now you can apologize to us for putting out misinformation yet again.
Expect some World of Wiener Warcraft style posts too.
Here are some graphics you requested...
He he!!!
FYI
Don't flatter yourself, NYC Republican. That's been his tagline for some time.
Misinformation? Anyone that wants to see what happened can view yesterday’s Savage thread on their own, and decide for themselves who’s right. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1811457/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.