Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AZRepublican

> Already done, see:

Good arguments, and they seem well researched and reasoned.

But, honestly, what do you think are the odds that the Supreme Court is going to overturn 110 years of precedent that has been cited in other decisions in order to correct the Wong court?

Easier to re-amend the Constitution to clarify the question, would be my take on it.


13 posted on 04/09/2007 12:14:04 PM PDT by socrates_shoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: socrates_shoe

Well the court has overturned itself after 100 years before. Consider also the ruling in Wong Kim had nothing to do with illegal aliens either.

Our judiciary just plum sucks when it comes to ruling on the written law. Too much agenda and bias involved in the supreme court.


14 posted on 04/09/2007 12:21:18 PM PDT by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson