Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Impeach Nancy Pelosi?
New Media Journal ^ | April 14, 2007 | Doug Edelman

Posted on 04/14/2007 12:36:45 PM PDT by edeldoug

Nancy Pelosi’s recent trip to Syria represents more than a partisan jab at the Bush Administration and its policies. It goes to the very heart of the constitutional foundation of our republic!

While Harry Reid is waving the Constitution in our faces – citing the independent power of the legislative branch of government – he conveniently diminishes the constitutional authority of the Presidency with his statement that the Democrats represent the people, while the President DOES NOT!

The Democrats, and particularly Pelosi and Reid, have apparently forgotten Constitution 101. The power to set Foreign Policy resides ONLY in the Presidency. As long as George Bush holds the office, HIS policy IS the Foreign Policy of the United States.

For that matter, the power to determine the Military’s mission and it’s strategies reside with the Commander in Chief – which role is also held solely by Mr. Bush.

Ms. Pelosi has been attempting to set herself up as the de-facto leader of a shadow government – operating to circumvent the constitutional authority and the relevancy of the President and of the office of the Presidency. This is an insurrection. An insurgency within our government!

There exists a federal law known as the Logan Act:

(Excerpt) Read more at newmediajournal.us ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: burqagirl; constitutionalcrisis; democrattakeover; dhimmicrats; insurrection; loganact; nancypelosi; pelosi; pelosiimpeachment; separationofpowers; shadowgovernment; syria; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2007 12:36:47 PM PDT by edeldoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

I not only want her impeached I want that women wearing an orange jumpsuit. She far exceeded the authority of her office and flagrantly violated the Constitution with her little “Hey look at me!” trip to cohort with the enemy.

In her delusional “I’m so important” world she apparently thinks it’s the Speaker of the House’s role to set foreign policy instead of the President. This woman is in need of a good old fashioned southern bitch slapping.


2 posted on 04/14/2007 12:40:33 PM PDT by stm (Believe 1% of what you hear in the drive-by media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

The worst part of the non-prosecution of this will be the precedent it sets; Who will be next?


3 posted on 04/14/2007 12:41:04 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug
The House ands Senate are expected to discipline their own members.

There is no Constitutional basis for the impeachment of a member of the HoR.

4 posted on 04/14/2007 12:42:16 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

Not going to happen and it just makes the Right look silly to bring it up. This whole ‘impeach Pelosi’ thing is about one step up — maybe — from plain whining.


5 posted on 04/14/2007 12:42:32 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

According to what I’ve read and understand she is guilty of a felony. Anyone other than the POTUS that goes against the wishes of the President and travels to a foreign country to discuss the policies of the US can find themselves in prison for up to 3 years. “Logans law”, I believe.


6 posted on 04/14/2007 12:44:38 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

According to what I’ve read and understand she is guilty of a felony. Anyone other than the POTUS that goes against the wishes of the President and travels to a foreign country to discuss the policies of the US can find themselves in prison for up to 3 years. “Logans law”, I believe.


7 posted on 04/14/2007 12:44:41 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug
from Wickipedia...

The 1799 impeachment of Tennessee Senator William Blount stalled on the grounds that the Senate lacked jurisdiction over him. Because, in a separate action unrelated to the impeachment procedure, the Senate had already expelled Blount, the lack of jurisdiction may have been either because Blount was no longer a Senator, or because Senators are not "civil officers" of the U. S. who are subject to impeachment. At any rate, no other member of Congress has ever been impeached, although the Constitution does give authority to either house to expel members, which each has done on occasion, effectively removing the individual from functioning as a representative or senator.

(snip)

During the impeachment trial of Senator Blount, it was argued that the House of Representatives did not have the power to impeach members of either House of Congress; though the Senate never explicitly ruled on this argument, the House has never again impeached a member of Congress. The Constitution allows either House to expel one of its members by a two-thirds vote, which the Senate had done to Blount on the same day the House impeached him (but before the Senate heard the case).

8 posted on 04/14/2007 12:44:49 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut
Agreed....when anyone says this crap it makes them look whiny and goofy....more like a liberal with those looney ideas....I would expect this kind of hate from Code Pink.. though I know some on FR are kind of delusional too...*wink*.....oops.../sarc....
9 posted on 04/14/2007 12:47:03 PM PDT by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

When she heads off to Iran...will Iran hold her as a hostage? Now that’s the question here. Iran has to have a war start or the present regime is cooked. The only way I’m hearing they can possible stay in power is if there’s a war.


10 posted on 04/14/2007 12:47:21 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug
"Ms. Pelosi has been attempting to set herself up as the de-facto leader of a shadow government – operating to circumvent the constitutional authority and the relevancy of the President and of the office of the Presidency.

"This is an insurrection.

"An insurgency within our government!"

11 posted on 04/14/2007 12:49:06 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Idealogical purity is a luxury, pragmatism a necessity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

Why isn’t Rocky serving time? He visited that syrian thug.


12 posted on 04/14/2007 12:49:44 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stm

Pelosi’s burka pictures say it all, submit.


13 posted on 04/14/2007 12:53:57 PM PDT by Son House ( The Presidents enemies, are my enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The worst part of the non-prosecution of this will be the precedent it sets; Who will be next?

A weak president & a group of opposing thugs. The enemy is not in Bagdad - it is here.

14 posted on 04/14/2007 12:56:19 PM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

You are right. They just keep pushing it inch by inch. “What” will be next?


15 posted on 04/14/2007 1:00:39 PM PDT by FReepapalooza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

IMO if the reps don’t fight this tooth and nail, Ms. Chamberlain will keep on and get worse and worse.


16 posted on 04/14/2007 1:02:21 PM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
"The worst part of the non-prosecution of this will be the precedent it sets; Who will be next?"

Who will be next? Anyone who exceeds or oversteps their authority, that's who. And why should this set a precedent?

17 posted on 04/14/2007 1:03:25 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

Actually the PEOPLE are supposed to discipline THEIR representatives and have that option every TWO years.


18 posted on 04/14/2007 1:04:47 PM PDT by Prost1 (Fair and Unbiased as always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

Sounds like a plan. Bump.


19 posted on 04/14/2007 1:04:57 PM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edeldoug

So, what do we, the average citizen do about it?

Where’s the petition to present to our elected Reps?
I’ll surely sign.


20 posted on 04/14/2007 1:09:12 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson