Posted on 04/19/2007 3:13:26 AM PDT by aculeus
“The location in Syria of this material, he says, is also known to these intelligence agencies.”
Oh?
I attended a small lecture in 2004 given by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons. He said that he had toured a facility in Iraq that was identical to the Pantex facility (the US nuclear weapons fabrication facility outside Amarillo, TX). The only thing they couldn’t find was the uranium/plutonium.
One more thing: They also interviewed Iraqis whose job it was to take the white-collar workers in that facility out into the desert and shoot them.
the source
http://www.davegaubatz.com/
Sounds like a job for . . .WHORALDO!
[. . .But when it comes to Iraq, the western media behave collectively out of character. There is no openness to any facts that challenge the ‘line’. There is a mindset, so powerful as to amount to a kind of collective brainwashing, that it is been ‘proved’ that there were no WMD in Saddam’s Iraq. Any claim to the contrary, however authoritative or persuasive, is therefore brushed aside.
Even the brief public appearance on an official US website of the Saddam tape transcripts referred to in the memorandum above — in one of which Saddam could be heard talking in 2002-2003 about his ongoing nuclear programme — was referred to only in passing by the New York Times in a report whose incoherence managed to bury this explosive revelation altogether.
The docile US media, dependent as it is on government sources and handouts, is all too easily intimidated or bought off by pressure from a myriad different sources which all have their own conflicting reasons to suppress such politically damaging revelations.
Too many important reputations in the media now rest on the ruthless suppression of the faintest possibility that they might have been wrong.]
Meantime, made me ill seeing O'Reilly talk with 'Whoopi' last week, offering a 'line' all too familiar to him. . .that ok. . ."you were right". . .about WMD's and GB's 'mistake' but now. . .blah/blah. . .
Think Hannity the 'same'. . .and Rush offers he does not care 'who' was right. . .but only how we move forward. And, could be he is well aware of the 'catch 22' that exists for both sides here; or maybe not; but I think it important for 'truth' to be the starting point. . .particularly because of the idiology attached to the synthetic version; and more importantly; many in America need to be reawakened to these 'outcome based strategies'. . .
Think 'out here'. . .we had better start e-mailing with info and expectations. . .
Ask yourself, who benefits if there is no record of WMDs in Iraq? Then you’ll be close to the answer as to how any trace of them disappears.
“Sounds like a job for . . .WHORALDO!”
He can do a special on the opening of Saddam Hussein’s secret bunkers. :)
There is a shadow government working within this administration to thwart exposure.
Joe Wilson lied. Joe Wilson was selected by his wife. Joe Wilson has publicly railed against policy ever since.
Bela Pelosi has gone to the Middle East to negotiate without the approval of the State Department.
The inmates are running the asylum.
Of course he did. The risk of the Russian nuclear arsenal falling into the hands of a nationalist, neo-Nazi government was deemed too great. Instead of one terrorist bomb, we might be facing 1,000 Zhirinovsky-controlled ICBMs. Bush took took the "no-WMD" political bullet to preserve Putin's government. And what's more, the Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee are well aware of it.
anyone that has real proof of wmd’s
should convey it to american liberals.
they believe “bush lied”,
and it’s their lie that carries the american public.
We went to war with Saddam because he refused to step down and refused continuously to obey treaties.
He clearly was attempting to obtain WMD whether or not his scientists were deliberately throwing wrenches in his war machine, as some have claimed. We don’t look the other way when a convicted felon on parole attempts repeatedly to obtain prohibited weapons. Saddam had been “on parole” since the first Gulf War.
Saddam was also a state sponsor of international terrorism, even if there are no proven links to Al Qaeda. He funded the families of suicide bombers operating in Israel.
The proclaimed basis for the War on Terror was to put an end to state sponsoring/harboring of terrorism. Iraq was not the only guilty nation, but it was one that had the many violations already on record.
Consider if Saddam had remained in power and was playing the same aid, shelter, training, and arming of terrorist miltias that Iran and other nations are engaging in while we have a presence in Iraq.
Better make sure the FBI files are alphabetized. Hillary can be one tough ****h if things aren't neat and orderly when handed to her.
If the Dems look at Karl Rove’s harddrive it is OK because it is government property but if the Republicans look at Ted Kennedy’s network sharedrive it is “spying”.
Dan Rather CLEARLY lied and the liberal retort is “fake but accurate”.
Does President Bush? The again, according to the article:
"The Republicans won’t touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralise the danger of Iraqi WMD . The Democrats won’t touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment."
i’m tired of hearing and seeing liberals say “bush lied”.
if there’s proof of wmds,
then get it to the public.
clearly the 2006 u.s. congressional election would have benefited from such information.
the liberals now control the “undecideds” and middle of the roaders.
keeper bump
Quite frankly, I think both sides have a vested interest in keeping the lid on this one.
The Dems have too much vested in the "Bush lied" spin to back away from it now.
And one of the criticisms of Bush's plan to invade Iraq is that the WMDs could be scattered. That appears to have happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.