Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Reports Skyscraping Early Money Total for White House Bid
Congressional Quarterly - CQ Politics ^ | 4/19/07

Posted on 04/19/2007 1:50:48 PM PDT by areafiftyone

Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani has led the long list of 2008 Republican presidential contenders in early preference polls — and his perceived position as the front-runner, at least for now, was not contradicted by his recent campaign finance report, which shows he has already built a sizable treasury.

Giuliani’s campaign reported total first-quarter receipts of $16.6 million, which included a $1.85 million transfer from the presidential “exploratory” committee he established last November.

With total receipts of $18 million for his campaign to date, Giuliani leads all but three of the current crop of White House hopefuls — Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, and Republican Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor — in overall campaign receipts.

Giuliani ended the quarter with $11.9 million left to spend. All but about $1.1 million of Giuliani’s funds were raised for the nominating campaign, with the rest for possible use in the general election should he win the nomination.

Giuliani’s report includes numerous donations that highlight his ties to New York, the nation’s most populous city, which Giuliani headed as mayor from 1993 through 2001.

As an example, Giuliani received contributions from about 30 employees of Lehman Brothers, the large financial services firm that is headquartered in New York.

Giuliani is a longtime fan of baseball’s New York Yankees, who happened to win four World Series titles during his eight years as mayor. Several team executives, including principal owner George Steinbrenner, gave to Giuliani’s presidential campaign.

This profile of Giuliani’s report is the latest in a CQPolitics.com series that is analyzing the first-quarter campaign finance filings of all 19 Democratic and Republican candidates.

Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani

• Receipts, Jan. 1 to March 31: $16.6 million

• Receipts to date: $18 million

• Expenditures, Jan. 1 to March 31: $5.7 million

• Expenditures to date: $6.1 million

• Cash-on-hand, March 31: $11.9 million

• Debts, March 31: $89,000

Notable individual donors
(who are allowed to contribute $2,300 to a candidate for a primary campaign and $2,300 for a general election campaign)

• John F. Antioco, chairman and chief executive officer of Blockbuster: $2,300

• Richard D. Beckman, president of Conde Nast Media Group: $2,300

• Brian Cashman, general manager of the New York Yankees baseball team: $2,300

• Miguel Estrada, a partner at the firm Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher and an unsuccessful nominee for a federal judgeship in 2003: $2,300

• Alan D. Feld, a senior executive partner at the firm Akin Gump: $2,300

• John Grant, professional staff member for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee: $250

• Keith Hernandez, sports broadcaster and a former professional baseball player for the St. Louis Cardinals, New York Mets and Cleveland Indians: $1,000

• Michael D. Hess, a founding partner and senior managing director of Giuliani Partners LLC and Giuliani’s former corporation counsel during his mayoral tenure: $4,600

• John O’Hurley, actor: $4,600

• Susan Molinari, chairman and chief executive officer of The Washington Group and a former House member from New York (1990-97): $1,900 (Molinari also gave Giuliani’s campaign $2,100 in late 2006, bringing her contributions to $4,000)

• Theodore B. Olson, partner at Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher and a former U.S. solicitor general: $2,500 (Olson also gave Giuliani’s campaign $2,100 in late 2006, bringing his contributions to the maximum of $4,600)

• Adam Sandler, actor: $2,100

• Charles R. Schwab, chairman and chief executive officer of Charles Schwab Co.: $2,300

• Ben Stein, an author and actor who served as an aide to presidents Richard M. Nixon and Gerald Ford: $750

• George Steinbrenner, principal owner of the New York Yankees: $4,600

• Chad Sweet, chief of staff at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security: $4,600

• James S. Turley, chairman and chief executive officer of Ernst & Young: $2,100

Candidate committees and political action committees (PACs)

One of Giuliani’s strongest supporters in Congress is California Republican Rep. David Dreier, who donated $2,300 through his House campaign committee and another $5,000 through another political committee, American Success PAC.

Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Charlie Dent, who represents the 15th District in and around Allentown and Bethlehem, donated $2,300 through his political committee, Dedicated to Establishing National Teamwork PAC, which forms an acronym of the congressman’s last name.

Among his political supporters at a more grassroots level is West Virginia state Sen. Vic Sprouse, whose campaign committee gave Giuliani’s campaign a $1,000 contribution.

Notable expenses

Giuliani’s campaign reported spending $897,000 on payroll to 82 individuals. Other expenses included $225,000 on postage — including a payment of $167,000 to the Austin, Texas-based firm Olsen & Shuvalov. Giuliani’s campaign also spent more than $116,000 on catering.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giuliani; liberalandleggy; rudyscash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-247 next last
To: spikeytx86

I hope that is true. I would welcome Thompson into the race.

I know it sounds rude to say Rudy should be purged. I mean it more in the sense that posts supporting Rudy should be purged, just as posts that support liberal candidates and ideas have always been purged on this forum. If you are having a discussion comparing Thompson and Romney’s views and ideas and someone comes in and starts shilling for Rudy, then you are drawn away from discussing viable candidate’s views. We wouldn’t let anyone that supported Hillary go into a thread and try to distort one of the candidates views in support of liberal Hillary.

Discussion about Rudy and his views are still important, but in the same sense that discussion of Hillary and Obama’s views are important - to expose their liberalism.


221 posted on 04/19/2007 10:27:24 PM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Elyse
Well many here who support Rudy could not honestly be labeled anything close to liberals. Their support of Rudy is deeply misguided like mine was, but it is by no means subversive. A lot of people are scared, the thought of Hillary or any Dem with both houses of congress in a time of war scares the bejeezus out of a lot of folks. They see someone who has been doing very well in the polls, and is strong on defense so people are attracted to him. The barrage of attacks on them only cements them in there positions. I believe that with reasoned and civilized debate, many “rudybots” will come to the same conclusion that I did, and that is “The emperor has no clothes”. Especially with the entrance of a consensus candidate. I just can’t see what good can come from a lynching at this time. The time for a good lynching was back in 05’ and early 06’, now it is time to at least try and reconcile our differences so that we can find that candidate that will rally together the various “conservative garrisons” that make up the GOP base, as well as inspiring independents to our banner.
222 posted on 04/19/2007 10:44:08 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
Well many here who support Rudy could not honestly be labeled anything close to liberals. Their support of Rudy is deeply misguided like mine was

I agree with you on that. I don't think that many of Rudy's supporters have set out to be trouble makers, but they are disrupting the forum.

The barrage of attacks on them only cements them in there positions. I believe that with reasoned and civilized debate, many “rudybots” will come to the same conclusion that I did

When Steve Forbes first announced that he was running for President I bought him hook, line and sinker. Very many people on this forum very rudely pointed out that I didn't really know his true positions and gave me some facts. Another time I made a statement about Margaret Sanger. I was very, very rudely pointed to some facts that I didn't know. I still can't stand some of the posters that pointed me to the facts and I think they are rude and obnoxious, but I see that some of them are normally nice, but my stupid posts just brought out an emotional response. Regardless about how I feel about the posters, I didn't discard the facts they gave me.

Everyone here isn't nice. But most of us here are just passionate about issues and can do a Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde on you in a heartbeat. If you are going against the tide on a conservative forum you are going to get a barrage of attacks. We aren't just calling them poopoo heads, we are giving them facts to reason with them and they are discarding them.

223 posted on 04/19/2007 11:44:45 PM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Registered; Extremely Extreme Extremist
You're letting your personal failures and inability to accomplish anything in life (as noted in your Freeper profile)

I just looked at his profile and have no clue what you're referring to.

224 posted on 04/20/2007 1:11:05 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Every conservative Senator lost his re-election. There are no real conservative governors. Bush initially won only because of the Electoral college and the Traitor running against him obtained the second highest vote total in US history.

So let's just give up. Great attitude.

225 posted on 04/20/2007 1:12:19 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I haven’t decided whom to support, but if this forum doesn’t quit jumping around from candidate to candidate in search of the anti-Rudy, it’s going to face some problems.

And will you cut it out with this nonsense? You people are always the ones who are telling us to push electable Republicans. Hunter is sadly not electable. But now you're complaining that we have found someone who is electable and palatable. What in the hell is so bad about this?!?

226 posted on 04/20/2007 1:15:18 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thanks Jim. God bless you.


227 posted on 04/20/2007 5:27:10 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

.


228 posted on 04/20/2007 5:46:11 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

bump


229 posted on 04/20/2007 7:01:24 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
And will you cut it out with this nonsense? You people are always the ones who are telling us to push electable Republicans. Hunter is sadly not electable. But now you're complaining that we have found someone who is electable and palatable.

Who put Tabasco in your jock strap? My point is that if this forum can't rally around the eventual Republican nominee, it will be in trouble. What is nonsensical about that?

As of today, this forum is in fairly broad agreement that Fred Thompson would make a good nominee. Trouble is, he isn't running, at least not yet. And if he does run, he might not win the nomination. And then, what will you do?

If this forum is hostile to the supporters of the nominee, if that doesn't happen to be Fred Thompson, how supportive will they be of this forum and how comfortable will they be in posting at all?

Those are fair questions, and just because they make you uncomfortable is not a reason for me not to ask them.

230 posted on 04/20/2007 11:06:27 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
That said, I don't think a blood letting is what we need here on F.R. or in the conservative movement in general. Our enemies will exploit our division and probably already are to some extent. We are doing exactly what they wanted and expected.

It's not fighting amongst ourselves when we realize that the enemy is behind our lines fighting us as we try to fight the enemy before us. We have to clear the trenches of the enemy, stop their efforts to undermine our fortifications, fill the gaps, and then continue to fight the enemy on the battlefield. You can't do that with the enemy working within our ranks to sabotage our efforts and demoralize our fighters.

231 posted on 04/20/2007 11:45:35 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
First of all, sorry about the tone of my last post. I do 4-day weeks during the spring and summer and go out and get tanked with friends on Thursday nights. I had also just finished reading another thread that pissed me off.

I was specifically annoyed at the "why are the Hunter fans abandoning him" line of questioning. I'm sure you were sincere in asking it, but several posters on the new anti-freeping site have been mocking Hunter supporters who have jumped on the Thompson boat after realizing that Hunter is not gaining ground. Since that pretty much sums up my situation, I get a bit offended by it.

My point is that if this forum can't rally around the eventual Republican nominee, it will be in trouble.

I personally think that FR will be fine with a non-Thompson candidate other than Rudy. I think we'll be able to get behind Romney and probably even McCain.

Sorry again for being bitchy last night/this morning. You're one of the posters I enjoy chatting with.

232 posted on 04/20/2007 11:47:38 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Out of curiosity, what new anti-freeping site are you talking about? I would have thought it was DU, except that they aren’t new. They are very anti-freeper, though; they seem to be obsessed with us.


233 posted on 04/20/2007 11:58:46 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Okay, apology accepted, and no hard feelings.

If it is McCain, though, we’ll have a different problem. Mass suicide.


234 posted on 04/20/2007 1:09:13 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
It's not fighting amongst ourselves when we realize that the enemy is behind our lines fighting us as we try to fight the enemy before us.

I'm not a Rudy supporter. I haven't made my choice yet. But let me get this straight. A person who supports Rudy, or who might support Rudy, is the enemy?

235 posted on 04/20/2007 3:40:22 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar; Spiff
“A person who supports Rudy, or who might support Rudy, is the enemy?”

Rudy is definitely the enemy to conservatives, no question. He’s a liberal just like his momma said.

“He only became a Republican after he began to get all these jobs from them. He’s definitely not a conservative Republican. He thinks he is, but he isn’t.”
— Rudy’s mother Helen

Those who support Rudy are the enemy IF they come on this forum to put down conservatives and tell conservatives here that Rudy (a liberal) is the only republican candidate that we should support. Expressing your support for a liberal is fine by me, and apparently it’s fine with Jim, but it isn’t fine to diss conservatives while promoting a liberal on FR. That is contrary to the mission statement and rules of FR. You've been here seven years, surely you know this by now.

236 posted on 04/20/2007 7:08:57 PM PDT by dmw (Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: dmw; Spiff

I have not given my support to anyone yet. I have not ruled out anyone, although there are some candidates who I don’t think can win the nomination. Fred is not among those - but he hasn’t declared yet.

I won’t diss anyone for supporting any candidate.


237 posted on 04/20/2007 7:18:47 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: conserv8ive1

The biggest difference is the one which counts most. The Republican Party will defend the nation from its enemies rather than surrender or help them become more dangerous.

Any review of Clinton’s works is sufficienct proof of that. And that is extensively documented by one of our own.


238 posted on 04/20/2007 9:23:00 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Elyse

Your suggestion of turning FR into a Right Wing version of DU is a sure fire way to kill the forum. Its tolerance of many viewpoints some even crackpot gives it it uniqueness and power. If you cannot deal with Rudy Guiliani here you certainly will not be able to in the large contest.


239 posted on 04/20/2007 9:28:13 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Such a distortion is NOT my attitude. My attitude is we must know the lay of the land in order to win. That is all I have done is describe the lay of the land.

In war tactical retreats are necessary in order to ultimately achieve victory. These do not imply any change in the ultimate strategy or goal.

The simple fact is the Treason media has made conservatives toxic to the voter and until that changes they will lose. Rudy can help change that. And provide inroads to urban voters which must be made at some point or the GOP is not going to succeed.


240 posted on 04/20/2007 9:32:46 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson