I'll bet you can kick someone out for setting a fire in the dorm.
I wouldn't be surprised if expectations of privacy start to become whittled down in the next few years. And to be honest, I'd like to see that happen. There are lunatics and criminals out there, and I for one would like to know who they are. If society cannot lock them up, then at least let me know who they are so I can take steps to protect myself and my family.
To leave these people out in society, and to hide their dangerous nature from other citizens, is a great evil.
Keep in mind that millions of Americans have some form of mental illness (depression, bipolar, etc) and the overwhelming majority are no more dangerous to others than anyone else. I fear that Cho and all the publicity around him will create stigmas for a lot of good people and may prevent people from acknowledging their issues and getting help.
I guess the only option left is to let law abiding, decent people to have the right to defend themselves. That would mean that we don’t allow large killing zones, also called gun free zones to be created by the politically correct and functionally stupid.
For the most part, universities cannot tell parents about their childrens problems without the students consent. They cannot release any information in a students medical record without consent. And they cannot put students on involuntary medical leave, just because they develop a serious mental illness.
I find it extremely interesting that the Liberals are such hypocrites that they can’t see themselves in what they say. Who got these laws passed? Who is against parental rights? Who got all the mentally ill released and put on the streets? Who is it that proposes that mentally ill be protected by these laws in ALL circumstance?
A very common way of putting, "there's nothing anyone can do".
From 1788 until 1963, we had laws to effectively deal with psychopaths.
The "new" laws were passed by humans, and the humans who presently occupy high office can pass other laws to replace them.