Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stashiu
It is the same issue when the family wants to know, “Did he suffer?” Get real, what are you going to say....the truth when it serves no purpose other than to take the loss into the realm of agony?

Friendly fire is different than the question of if he suffered simply because the truth is going to eventually come out, and then the family is not only devestated by the truth but they feel betrayed by having been misled. Then they might start questioning if the friendly fire was actually accidental.

I agree that it isn't a black and white issue. However, in instances of friendly fire, especially when a considerable number of people are aware of the truth, telling the family the truth is the only real option. Telling the white lie just delays telling the truth, and causes distrust.

I also feel that Tillman being killed by friendly fire makes him no less of a hero. Tillman's heroism should be honored. Instead his death is being twisted for political means.

God rest Tillman’s soul and may his family find some peace.

Amen.

31 posted on 04/24/2007 12:57:35 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: untrained skeptic

I will say, that in this instance, with family on the scene itself, it would appear that the truth of the matter would have been better settled early. However, in many instances, it is not uncommon for combat brothers to agree to hold back on the details of someone’s demise. It is usually done in the spirit of a gift to the family. When done for other reasons, it is heinous.


34 posted on 04/24/2007 1:05:59 PM PDT by Stashiu (RVN, 1969-70)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson