Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wuli

Regardless of what ‘the people’ want, wouldn’t the ‘pursuancy’ clause be able to hold the fort intact by itself?


23 posted on 04/25/2007 2:16:16 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Eastbound

“Regardless of what ‘the people’ want, wouldn’t the ‘pursuancy’ clause be able to hold the fort intact by itself?”

Publius, who started this thread, could tell you better than I if that clause SHOULD “hold”.

Whether or not it should, I am not very fond of testing the public’s will to MAKE it hold, if holding it was needed to prevent some great “public will” (media and Dim driven) that came ramrodding out of a convention, against the rules set for that convention.

Publius has greater respect for “public integrity” of the public in general than I do, and frankly I applaud him for it and truly wish I was less cynical. Maybe I’m older (or feel older).


37 posted on 04/25/2007 3:16:54 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson