Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Turns Up the Heat
Rush Limbaugh's Web Site ^ | 4-26-2007 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 04/26/2007 5:12:05 AM PDT by Jake The Goose

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last
Here is a link to the full audio - anyone can play:

http://www.ebainc.com/mp3_files/rush_on_rudy_4_25_07.mp3

That renowned LIBERAL Rush Limbaugh praising Rudy Giuliani.

Hmmmm !!!!!!!!!

1 posted on 04/26/2007 5:12:07 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

All of the Republicans would be wise to follow this strategy. The more they attack DEMOCRATS and show them to be the traitors they are, the better they will do.


2 posted on 04/26/2007 5:13:09 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Exactly.

You can dislike Rudy - but you have to agree with his statements.


3 posted on 04/26/2007 5:15:39 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

Rudy is repeating what Rush has been saying for some time.


4 posted on 04/26/2007 5:17:12 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose; LS

Be careful, be very careful..anything remotely perceived as praising Rudy can get you instantly sent to limbo, er, Limbaugh...


5 posted on 04/26/2007 5:18:24 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Really?

Thanks - I did not know that.

I don’t want to engage anyone in political dialog.

Thanks


6 posted on 04/26/2007 5:19:28 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: airborne

I can’t argue with that.


7 posted on 04/26/2007 5:19:45 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

If the field stays as it is now, Rush will come to support Rudy. I believe that. Rush is a pragmatist and he understands what’s at stake here. He’s not going to reject Rudy as a cheap device to pump himself or his show up. I have to believe that throwing out red meat to the mobs is not as important to him as saving the country from 8 more years of Clinton.


8 posted on 04/26/2007 5:21:08 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

Here’s another interesting Rudy video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM


9 posted on 04/26/2007 5:22:19 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

You might be right - I think Rush will hold off until the end of the year - maybe even early 08’ before he makes any endorsement.


10 posted on 04/26/2007 5:24:01 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veronica; Jake The Goose; All

I’ve been wondering about Rush’s stand on Rudy (I have to work and can’t listen like I used to).

It’s got to be a dilemma for him, given what’s been going on.

Does anyone know—did he take a position on a candidate in 2000 before the nominee was selected?


11 posted on 04/26/2007 5:26:14 AM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

That would be the smart thing, and certainly, Rush is smart. :)


12 posted on 04/26/2007 5:26:56 AM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LS
Let me say this. I’m not a supporter of Rudy Giuliani in the primaries, but what he says about the WOT is dead on, and I am glad to hear his is support for it. However it is hard for me to see how this sets Giuliani apart from the other Republicans. They all seem to show equal support for the WOT except for Ron Paul, who really isn’t a Republican.

It does set Giuliani apart from all of the Democrats. Maybe that’s what Rush meant. This is why, if I am forced to choose between any of the Democrats, Giuliani, and any 3rd party, I vote for Giuliani. A 3rd party vote will only help to elect an anti-war liberal, and that would be worse than a pro-war liberal IMHO.

Still with or without my vote Giuliani can’t win the presidency. He won’t be able to draw enough Republicans to the polls, and the Democrats (even blue Dog Dems) aren’t going to vote for him instead of a true Dem.

Fred Thompson is the only Republican that can fire up the party, and he alone will have the attractiveness to draw cross over votes in sufficient quantities to put a Republican in the White House in 2009.

13 posted on 04/26/2007 5:27:08 AM PDT by HoustonTech (Go Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

Good question - I do not know.

I doubt it - Rush is very very careful with things like this.

He really respects his audience.

I do know that he does not like John McCain - I think we all know that.


14 posted on 04/26/2007 5:27:45 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech
Let me say this. I’m not a supporter of Rudy Giuliani in the primaries, but what he says about the WOT is dead on, and I am glad to hear his is support for it. However it is hard for me to see how this sets Giuliani apart from the other Republicans. They all seem to show equal support for the WOT except for Ron Paul, who really isn’t a Republican.

I think Rush might have meant it sets him apart only because he is leading and will take a lot heat from the dems. You are correct - Rudy's view is NOT unique among our candidates. Not at all.

15 posted on 04/26/2007 5:29:37 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Rush has already made it clear that a) he will not call someone who ISN'T a conservative a conservative, and b) he will evaluate the candidate on OVERALL desirability vs. Hillobama. That leads me to believe that if it's Rudy, he will support Rudy.

But the key as I understand Rush is that he wants someone who will FIGHT the Democrats---if not on every issue, then on SOME issues---and decisively defeat them. If it's the WoT, fine. I think that view is what most people I talk to want. Despite the abortion obsesssion here, most people, and certainly most Republicans I talk to, are more concerned with the WoT and making sure the Dems don't lose this war.

16 posted on 04/26/2007 5:33:38 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech
I hate having to cowtow to the intellectual fascism that requires me to say, "Rudy isn't my first choice, Fred Thompsons is---but he isn't running." But ok, I said it.

HOWEVER, I disagree that this doesn't "set Rudy apart" from the other Republicans. Many of these things are tied together---Gonzolez, WoT, etc. So when McCrazy comes out and says Gonzolez should resign, and the same day Rudy ATTACKS DEMOCRATS, there is a huge gulf opening up. Romney, while he has been critical of Dems, isn't being INCINDIARY, which is what I think the GOP candidate needs to do at this point.

Put it this way: I predict, barring Fred getting into the race, that the first candidate to emphatically call for Harry Reid's resignation will win the nomination in a landslide!!

17 posted on 04/26/2007 5:36:47 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
Actually, while his VIEW might not be different, the RHETORIC with which he is expressing it certainly is. So he is being perceived as MUCH more "anti-Dem," much stronger on the WoT. It's all about perceptions.

If someone wants to actually leapfrog Rudy, try calling for Harry Reid's resignation, not that of Gonzolez.

18 posted on 04/26/2007 5:38:10 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LS

Right on the money - who knows - maybe Rudy’s rant will raise
the roof for the other candidates.

Maybe they will gain some guts and before you know - we have a party with brass ba_ls.


19 posted on 04/26/2007 5:49:56 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
RUSH: All right, Rudy Giuliani. Let's go to the audio sound bites here.  Rudy is turning up the heat, getting into some partisanship here, which is good, because there's a huge difference between Republicans and Democrats on the war.  So say it!  And Rudy did.  He said, "We have to stay on offense. The Democrats want to put us back on defense." Yesterday in Manchester, New Hampshire, at the Rockingham County Republican Party's annual Lincoln Day Dinner, a portion of Rudy's remarks.

GIULIANI:  This war ends when they stop planning to come here and kill us, but until then, if I have anything to say about it, the lesson that I learned coming out of September 11, 2001, is: never, ever again will this country be on defense waiting for them to attack us. (applause) The United States of America will be on offense (applause) and make no mistake about it, the Democrats want to put us back on defense.

RUSH:  Amen!  It's about time! It is about time.  You know, Rich Galen had it right in his Mullings blog.  You've got Harry Reid proclaiming defeat.  The war is lost!  If the Republican apparatus were up and running, they'd be demanding of every elected Democrat, "Do you stand with Harry Reid? Do you agree with Harry Reid," and then people would be calling for Reid's resignation.  None of that is happening.  Here's another portion of what Rudy had to say.

GIULIANI:  The Democrats -- and I could make a lot of other points about this -- do not understand the full nature and scope of the terrorists' war against us.  But I listened a little bit to the Democratic debates and I think I could be slightly wrong about this, but I think this is almost correct.  If one of them gets elected it's almost like we're going on defense, where we've got a timetable for withdrawal of Iraq. We're going to wave the white flag there. We're going to try to cut back on the Patriot Act. We're going to cut back on electronic surveillance. We're going to cut back on interrogation. We're going to cut back, cut back, cut back -- and we'll be back in our pre-September 11 mentality of being on defense.

RUSH:  Yes.  He basically said -- you know, I've said this -- the Democrats want to try to go back and pretend that we can live in a 9/10 world, and that's essentially what he is saying here -- and they are flipped out! They are mad as they can be about this, and the Drive-Bys. See, when Rudy does things like this, or when Cheney responds to Dingy Harry, the Drive-Bys say, "This is just beyond the pale! Now it's getting personal." (laughing)  Now it's getting personal.  When Republicans respond, "Now it's getting personal."  Dingy Harry can call Bush an idiot. He can call Bush Hitler! The Democrats can say whatever they want, that's not "personal."  It's good liberalism. That's just "good politics."  But the Republicans respond? "Now it's getting personal."  Rudy's on a roll here.  Two more to go.  Here's the next one.

GIULIANI:  The question is going to be, "How long does it take, and how many losses do we have along the way?"  And I truly believe if we go back on defense for a period of time, we can ultimately have more losses and it's going to go on much longer.  The power of our ideas is so great we'll eventually prevail.  The real question is, "How do we get there?"  Do we get there in a way in which it is as expeditious as possible and with as little loss of life as possible, or do we get there in some circuitous fashion.

RUSH:  Truer words never spoken.  If we're on defense with a Democrat president, we will have more losses and it will go on longer.  The Democrats do not understand the full nature and the scope of the terrorist war against us.  Truer words were never spoken.  In fact, it's a little bit more dangerous than the fact that they're just ignorant and don't understand.  They think they do.  They think that all they have to do is meet with these people and with the power of their personality, the aura of goodness that these liberals exude, they are convinced that the bin Ladens and the Zarqawis and the Zawahiris, et al, will no longer hate us.  They, and they alone, can rebuild America's tattered reputation in the world.  This is where they're naïve, and this has been played out over the years.  They've thought this about the Soviets. They've thought it about every enemy we've got.  They're just nothing but giant appeasers, and they think the only reason that we're at war is because we have a nutcase in the White House.  They think the only reason we're at war, the only reason Islamists hate us is because of George W. Bush going into Iraq, and they can change all that! They can stop the hate.  They can make sure that we are loved and respected again just by the force of their personalities being in leadership positions.  Finally, here's a clear articulation of what this war is about from Rudy.

GIULIANI:  They hate us, not because of anything bad we've done.  This has nothing to do with any aggression on the part of the United States of America. It has nothing to do with anything America is taking from anyone. It has nothing to do with Israel and Palestine.  They hate us for the freedoms that we have and the freedoms that we want to share with the world, because the freedoms that we have and the freedoms that we want to share with the world are in conflict with their perverted interpretation of their religion, their maniacal, violent, and perverted interpretation of their religion in which they train their young people to be suicide bombers, and they train them to hate you and despise you, and they train them to hate your religion, and to not allow you to have religion of your own, or anyone else.  They hate us for the reasons that are the best about us, because we have freedom of religion, because we have freedom for women, because women are allowed to participate in society, because we have elections, because we have a free economy.  Well, we're not giving that up, and you're not going to come and take it from us.

RUSH:  Rudy Giuliani, setting himself apart from the field, at least with that appearance.  Again, that was in Manchester, New Hampshire, at the Rockingham County Republican Party's annual Lincoln Day Dinner. 

20 posted on 04/26/2007 5:53:45 AM PDT by areafiftyone (.....We mourn and hurt and will never forget, but we don't live under fear.... Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
who knows - maybe Rudy’s rant will raise the roof for the other candidates. Maybe they will gain some guts and before you know - we have a party with brass ba_ls.

In other words, Rudy is providing leadership, and we're hoping that other Republicans spine up and follow his lead? Yet we don't want him leading us, because he's the same as Hillary? Is anyone else getting dizzy?

21 posted on 04/26/2007 5:53:48 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (If every Republican is a RINO, then no Republican is a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

You have mail!


22 posted on 04/26/2007 5:56:39 AM PDT by areafiftyone (.....We mourn and hurt and will never forget, but we don't live under fear.... Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

Good solid observation - I had not thought of that.

You’re right - he is leading.


23 posted on 04/26/2007 5:57:05 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LS
So when McCrazy comes out and says Gonzolez should resign, and the same day Rudy ATTACKS DEMOCRATS, there is a huge gulf opening up. Romney, while he has been critical of Dems, isn't being INCINDIARY, which is what I think the GOP candidate needs to do at this point.

Put it this way: I predict, barring Fred getting into the race, that the first candidate to emphatically call for Harry Reid's resignation will win the nomination in a landslide!!

I basically agree regarding McCain. While he supports the WOT, his jabs at the President and his subordinates don't win any sympathy from me. IMO Don Rumsfield is a great American, and McCain stabbed him in the back. If I had to choose between Giuliani and McCain, that would have to be weighed in. It would be a hard choice for me.

Personally I don't want Republicans to treat Democrats in kind. Democrats play incendiary politics like pros, but it's one of the things I hate about them. The best approach IMO is to confront Democrats forcefully with reason and facts; not to use inflammatory rhetoric that serves only to obscure substantive debate.

Being the first to call for Reid's head won't win any votes. Let the Democrats show their true colors by putting folks like Reid in power. Shame them for it; call attention to it; fight them on every issue. But if they want to show the world how radical they are by lifting up men like him, let them. It can only help the Republicans.

24 posted on 04/26/2007 6:00:22 AM PDT by HoustonTech (Go Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
>>>>That renowned LIBERAL Rush Limbaugh praising Rudy Giuliani.

Yeah right. Rush praised Arnie Schwarzy too back in 2003, and we all know how that turned out. Rudy is a great liberal, he would make a fine Democrat, but as a Republican, he sucks.

25 posted on 04/26/2007 6:00:54 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

My memory is a little different in 2003.

I remember Rush saying “Arnold is NO conservative - mark my words folks - time will tell”.

I know he likes Arnold personally - but I have no issue with that.


26 posted on 04/26/2007 6:03:28 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
Does anyone know—did he take a position on a candidate in 2000 before the nominee was selected?

He definitely did--he supported Bush agaisnt McCain.

27 posted on 04/26/2007 6:04:33 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
>>>>My memory is a little different in 2003.

In 2007 you seem to have lost your memory completely about the goals and objectives of Free Republic. This forum advances conservatism, promotes conservative candidates and defends the Constitution. That doesn't sound like Rudy Giuliani`s politics to me. We FReepers don't support liberal candidates for Prez period. Rudy is the furthest lefty candidate the GOP has ever had. He`s been splitting Republicans and severely damaging the GOP.

RudyBoostering is persona non grata on FR, or haven't you heard.

28 posted on 04/26/2007 6:10:50 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LS

“that the first candidate to emphatically call for Harry Reid’s resignation will win the nomination in a landslide!!”

Great! Duncan Hunter wins in a landslide!

Mr Hunter thanks you for your support.


29 posted on 04/26/2007 6:29:17 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Wow - for minute there I thought you were a reasonable and perhaps even an intelligent person.

Oops.

Just another exclusionary member of the “conservative movement”

Our way or the highway huh?


30 posted on 04/26/2007 6:29:35 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
Wrong attiude and wrong rhetoric for this forum, mister RudyBooster. My memory is excellent. I remember you running around for months with all your pals, trashing us conservatives everytime we spoke out against Rudy the liberal.

You're on the wrong forum if you support the gun grabbing, gay loving, amnesty supporting abortionist, Rudy Giuliani. Simple as that.

31 posted on 04/26/2007 6:39:11 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Why do you come into threads that want to talk about Rudy?

Were you invited?


32 posted on 04/26/2007 6:41:02 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Any how dare you use Ronald Reagan’s name as association.

I am man who never attacked any Republican.

You really should not associate yourself with a such a man.

You’re not acting worthy of Reagan’s name or legacy.


33 posted on 04/26/2007 6:42:51 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

Exclusionary? Is being against abortion, protecting gun rights, saving the sanctity of marriage between a men and a woman exclusionary? I believe those are core conservative principles.


34 posted on 04/26/2007 6:43:26 AM PDT by commonguymd (Move it to the right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

No - they are not.

Telling me I cannot be inside FR because I want to support
Rudy is exclusionary.

What’s more - it’s childish.

The GOP is more mature than that.

For that matter - I am more mature than that.


35 posted on 04/26/2007 6:45:39 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech
I respectfully disagree. Early on, I argued that Bush's "new tone" was necessary and would produce the results you claim. In fact, what has happened is that a charge that goes un-responded to becomes, in the minds of the public, a VALID charge.

Moreover, it's not enough (as Rudy says about the WoT) in a political sense to "play defense" and merely respond to charges, because then the public gets caught up in a game of, "well, if they are saying it, there must be some truth to it."

So I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that in fact you MUST play "gutter" politics, because when they hurl a charge and you attack back, in the minds of the public that negates the original charge as "they all do it."

Defense is not enough. A Republican must be on the attack, and aggressive, just to stay even and (one hopes) let the results then speak for themselves.

36 posted on 04/26/2007 6:47:04 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LS

I really agree with you.

Our candidates need to kick it up.


37 posted on 04/26/2007 6:48:41 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
Either you haven't noticed, or you're just playing dumb. FR doesn't support the liberal candidacy of Rudy Giuliani. Jim`s laid down the law and has been zotting many posters who keep ignoring the goals and objectives of this forum. One more time. This forum exists to advance conservatism, promote conservative candidates and defend the Constitution. That is not consistent with the liberal politics of Rudy Giuliani.

The right question is. Why do you keep promoting the liberal Rudy Giulaini on conservative Free Republic?

38 posted on 04/26/2007 6:49:12 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Except no one even knows who Hunter is. I'm talking about someone who is in the public eye. It would, unfortunately for you and Hunter, have to be McCrazy (who won't do it), Fred Thompson (who might, but isn't in the race), Newt (who could, but unfortunately also is all over the map saying too many things), Romney (ditto) or Rudy.

Any of the "top five" can get an important edge by saying this. The lower tier has no chance, because they already are perceived as just "playing to the base."

39 posted on 04/26/2007 6:49:23 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Why are you talking to me?

If you don’t support Rudy - get out of the thread.

I’m not trying to convince you of anything or anyone.

Go support a candidate - don’t spend your own valuable time attacking one or me.

And relax - skippy - I will support THE GOP candidate.

Man oh man - cats like you are a little tightly wound.


40 posted on 04/26/2007 6:52:58 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
>>>>>Any how dare you use Ronald Reagan’s name as association.

Reagan was a conservative and I support conservative candidates. You've been promoting Rudy the liberal for POTUS for many many months. Nuff said about that. Perhaps you should pay closer attention to the activity around FR these days. You're out of the conservative mainstream of this forum.

41 posted on 04/26/2007 6:54:55 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Are people not allowed to post positive impressions of Giuliani at Free Republic?


42 posted on 04/26/2007 6:56:52 AM PDT by Chunga (Conservatives Don't Let Democrats Win Elections. They Vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

I would question that - mature? Being for a liberal on a conservative site is somewhat questionable as well. There are plenty of sites specifically set up for Republicans and for liberals. There are plenty of sites for the left wing log cabin type republicans who are trying to move the party to the left.

I would consider FR a conservative site in my personal opinion. So pushing hard for a liberal on a GOP ticket who aspouses no conservative core values should bring rebuke. Whining about that rebuke because the “GOP” is mature is really immature imo.


43 posted on 04/26/2007 6:57:27 AM PDT by commonguymd (Move it to the right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose; jimrob
>>>>>Why are you talking to me?

You've been promoting and supporting the liberal Rudy Giuliani for many months. That is not in keeping with the goals of this conservative forum.

>>>>>If you don’t support Rudy - get out of the thread.

I don't think so.

44 posted on 04/26/2007 6:57:36 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Blah,,,

Take it easy friend - we’re on the same team.

I just like someone you don’t.

Really - take it easy... we’re just talking and expressing ourselves.


45 posted on 04/26/2007 6:57:55 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
>>>>>Take it easy friend - we’re on the same team.

Not even close.

46 posted on 04/26/2007 6:59:13 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; jimrob

Man - relax.

If you have noticed I have supported all our candidates.

Except McCain.


47 posted on 04/26/2007 6:59:18 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Listen - that’s enough.

I won’t respond to you - please don’t respond to me.

Let’s respect each other another to stay out of each other’s way.

Signing you off now - good luck to your candidate of choice.

GOP 2008

Gee


48 posted on 04/26/2007 7:01:30 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

Support for liberals isn’t welcome around this forum. Btw, its always been that way. This is a conservative forum.


49 posted on 04/26/2007 7:02:25 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

If you keep promoting Rudy Giuliani as you’ve been for months and months now, you’ll be hearing from other Freepers besides me.


50 posted on 04/26/2007 7:04:11 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson