Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNC Dean Says Giuliani's 'Personal Life Is A Serious Problem'
Drudge Report ^ | April 27, 2007

Posted on 04/27/2007 8:16:19 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: twigs

” Do you REALLY want to see a President Obama or another President Clinton?”

If we must have a liberal in the white house, I would prefer that it be a democrat. A democrat would have republican opposition to liberal programs. A liberal republican would not.

In the long run, we would be better off with a democrat than with Rudy.


61 posted on 04/27/2007 10:19:45 AM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: twigs
No we can not afford to have a Dem in the WH. I’ve had enough is these terrorist sympathizers
62 posted on 04/27/2007 10:27:42 AM PDT by scratcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: babygene

I personally think you’re out of your mind. Rudy does believe in protecting this country and I think he’ll pull out all the stops to see that we are not attacked again. When I think of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and their articulated hatred of our country (not in those words, but in their support of measures that insure our destruction) I cannot imagine anyone, particularly not a republic, who can even begin to think of a democrat in the WH.

And do you really believe that a liberal republican would not have republican opposition to liberal programs? You haven’t been listening, I’m guessing... Do you really believe that President Bush has conservative Republican support on his stands that are not conservative? Like the borders, for instance?


63 posted on 04/27/2007 10:28:27 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: twigs
No we can not afford to have a Dem in the WH. I’ve had enough of these terrorist sympathizers.
64 posted on 04/27/2007 10:29:15 AM PDT by scratcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Your entitled to your opinion. It’s my belief though that Rudy would be the worst possible person in the white house. He’s basically a democrat. He would still have opposition on the war from the democrats, but they would go along with his liberal policies.

Why do you think Rudy would be worthwhile regarding the war on terror? Because he says so? Other than being outraged at the attack on the WTC (along with 300 million others) what has he done. Well, one thing he tried to do was to get his x-limo driver put in charge of Homeland Security... What a jerk.

65 posted on 04/27/2007 11:14:41 AM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Can the hypocrisy of the left wing hate filled traitors reach a limit? Or is it limitless?

You're just being rhetorical, right?

You know it's limitless.

66 posted on 04/27/2007 11:17:06 AM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: babygene

Rudy is definitely not my first choice and socially, I agree with you that he is basically a democrat. But I have listened, and he talks constantly about protecting this country against terrorism. I believe he would do infinitely more to prevent a terrorist against than any democrat running. Yes, because he says so. He is a competent manager and we know that he did an amazing job with improving crime rates in NY. We don’t know what anyone will do once in the oval office, but I believe the Rudy is essentially a straight shooter. Very far from perfect and not my first choice. But I cannot envision my beloved country in the hands of another democrat. I want my child and future grandchildren to have a country that exists and one that they can be proud of.


67 posted on 04/27/2007 11:39:19 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Do the Dems REALLY want to got to “personal lives” in this race? I don’t think so. But I say let’s do it! Giuliani and Newt can show their stuff all day long next to the Clitnon’s. They better get a different front runner if they want to play that game - or do they? Republicans are notorious for taking slung mud from self-righteous, yet hypocritical, Dems. They stand there and just let themselves be dismantled. Newt won’t allow that, and I don’t think Giuliani will. Both Bushes did, and Dole did. They just stand there in disbelief that people could stoop so low. Will Repubs fight back this time? Lord knows they have an enormous amount of ammunition.


68 posted on 04/27/2007 12:24:37 PM PDT by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

And the Clinton’s isn’t, Doctor
Ho Ho?

Lord this guy is a basketcase.


69 posted on 04/27/2007 12:25:47 PM PDT by Badeye (Yesterday was pretty good, today is shaping up nicely, and tomorrow anything is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs

I agree with you. I’d like to see a President Hunter, but I don’t think there’s any way it’ll happen. I’d like to see a Vice-President Hunter—that’s a realistic hope, I think. As for Giuliani, if he’s our candidate, I’m voting for him. Whatever he did, he wouldn’t create nearly as much evil for this country as Clinton or Obama would.


70 posted on 04/27/2007 12:40:05 PM PDT by Mariebl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Hell, that’s exactly what many of the GOP say about Rudy, nothing to argue with here, I guess.


71 posted on 04/27/2007 12:41:40 PM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

when it comes to playing politics, Democrats are the masters at it.........

Well at this time, the Republicans sure as all heck are not masters at politics..........


72 posted on 04/27/2007 1:18:13 PM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

When Doctor Howard “Howlin’ Mad” Dean starts attacking our conservative presidential candidates, (you know—the ones we’ll actually nominate) I’ll start worrying.


73 posted on 04/27/2007 7:37:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers; All

Actually, it signals to me that he has subconsciously moved over to the Obama camp.


74 posted on 04/28/2007 12:42:15 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson