Posted on 04/27/2007 6:41:34 PM PDT by wagglebee
When I was in the third grade, everyone know that all queers wear brown and yellow on Thursday. Surely this knowledge has not vaporized in intervening 50 years.
Another reason to organize ten or so of your neighbors and take over your town/region’s school committee with pro-family folks.
I want my school tax dollars back. I’m sure that they play this BS here in Austin schools. Can almost gurantee it given the sick, liberal culture present in this town. I know they have been showing Man Bear Pig’s barf-o-rama, the sky is falling, eco-nazi cult craptacular on Global Warming ‘round the clock.
Now the city is talking about banning plastic grocery bags- wtf? They can be recycled!
If this indoctrination is such a good idea, what are they afraid of? You would think they’d want the widest exposure possible for their enlightened good deeds. But I guess not.
For years I collected every news story/example of the homosexual agenda being promoted to little kids in schools. I still have hundreds of examples in bulging file folders.
My intention was to write a book exposing their deliberate effort to influence children. I finally gave up. I just couldn’t take it any more.
Now I have two little girls of my own and my wife and I will likely be unable to send them to private school due to our current financial situation.
I never understood the homosexual argument. Just because you like to have sex a certain way, why does that qualify you for special status?
Why does the way you like to have sex mean that we should redefine marriage? Marriage is not defined by this position or that position, or this way or that way.
Homosexuals have exactly the same “rights” as heterosexuals do today. States “license” marriage. A homosexual man can get a license to marry a woman and so can a heterosexual man in any state.
The same “rights” apply. The way you have sex is irrelevant to the definition of marriage.
Yeah, like the parents, who just happen to be paying the school taxes to have THEIR children educated.
The “teacher” that shows something like that to my kids will have a difficult time around here - and a short one.
Thanks for posting.
Totally sick staff meeting. One woman asks, more or less, “Are we supposed to tell the kids with Christian values that they are wrong and homosexuality is right?” A ditzy teacher responds “Yes, we’re supposed to because we’re supposed to give them a good education.” Ex-gays and Christians should be suing BIG time.
The more I look at the state of public education and education in America, the more reasonable homeschooling appears.
They do this all the time. In San Diego, one of the elementary charter schools took the kids to the Gay Pride Parade where gyrating cowboys decorated the floats. A group took it to the City Council and they refused to see the pictures and hear the testimony about this child abuse. They like to keep their dirty little secrets in the dark. They can’t have the public know about them. The funny thing about the video... it was made at a Quaker School!
I’m with you Papa, I cried when I watched this. I feel for those young children, especially the little girl who read the poem and for any teachers who had to teach this in the classroom that didn’t agree with it.
May God turn this evil into something good for his glory!
Indeed.
Remember what Jesus said about those who corrupt children in Luke 17:2? It will not be pleasant to be in their shoes when they stand before Him on the day of judgement.
Also the fact that the propagandists are trying to hide this is proof positive that this is of the darkness because those that of the darkness hate the light and will not come into the light lest they be reproved, i.e., exposed.
“A voucher system would allow us to vote with our wallets. Let the Marxist hedonists reap what they sow - the market will correct the error of their ways or push them into material poverty to match their moral and intellectual poverty.”
Most of what you have to say is spot on, with the exception of the first sentence. Vouchers are the substitution of one socialist program for another, and will almost certainly be run by the same people running the current failed system. They’re a Trojan Horse and should be viewed as such.
“I never understood the homosexual argument. Just because you like to have sex a certain way, why does that qualify you for special status? Why does the way you like to have sex mean that we should redefine marriage? Marriage is not defined by this position or that position, or this way or that way.”
I’ll attempt to explain. The homosexual agenda has little to do with homosexuality per se. It’s really more of a stalking horse for a wider socialist and/or marxist agenda.
Socialism and it’s twisted sister, marxism, suffer from a very basic contradiction in terms. The worker/servant class that marxism and socialism seeks establish has to come from someplace. Socialist societies can use force to do a lot of things, but they haven’t figured out a good way to force the worker/servant class to breed children when they don’t want to. Socialism and marxism seek as their ultimate goal the reliance on the state for *all* things. And the irony is that socialist and marxist societies have had to rely on the family unit to produce the children it needs to secure it’s future. That family unit is by it’s nature both a religious and philosophically conservative construct.
I depart from the conservative reservation in that I don’t believe that the U.S. military buildup of the 1980’s was the primary reason behind the breakup of the soviet union and the marxist dictatorships of eastern europe. I think that was a contributing factor, but not the primary reason. I believe it was a far simpler problem: the birthrates in these marxist “utopias” had crashed. The worker/servant class simply stopped having kids. You can’t have a socialist/marxist utopia in the long run without a constant supply workers/servants. You also need a constant supply of young idealogues to wield the whip. But they simply weren’t being born.
In the long term socialism and marxism have to separate procreation from the family unit in order to triumph. By making procreation a purely biological act occuring outside the context of marriage, socialism and marxism can better secure a reliable supply of workers/servants as well as idealogues.
The homosexual agenda then needs to be seen in the context of the constant chipping away at the traditional family unit. By teaching children that homosexuality is normal, you help to separate sexuality from the context of traditional marriage. It’s an attempt to shift the paradigm so that it’s no longer seen as being necessary to get married.
I know just how you feel about being unable to get your kids out of the public schools for financial reasons. I am a public school teacher and mother who can’t quit and homeschool because of major family medical problems. We can’t afford to lose the health insurance.
However I wanted to reassure you that as a conservative it is possible to counteract the propaganda with your child. My daughter is very diligent in reporting to me when her teachers spout liberal talking points like “99% of Muslims are peaceful”, “We must save the Earth from global warming” , “Homosexuality is normal”, etc. Then we discuss the real facts and why people spread misinformation. She is only twelve, but she is quite able to discern when her teachers are making political statements rather than teaching. There is hope for the conservative children (and teachers) stuck in public schools!
Yes, first amendment rights are for the left to attack the right only, otherwise, they’re hate crimes ;)
I’m happy MassResistance kept them online - that’s a good site.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.