Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Captured Al Qaeda Document Shows Bin Laden Deputy Aymen Al Zawahiri Visited Iraq.
Combating Terrorism Center at West Point ^ | April 29 2007 | jveritas

Posted on 04/29/2007 1:24:13 PM PDT by jveritas

Edited on 04/29/2007 2:09:18 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

Document which is still up on the Harmony Data Base website is a captured Al Qaeda document in Afghanistan and shows without any doubt that Aymen Al Zawahiri who is the Bin Deputy and the so called “Al Qaeda Brain” had visited Iraq as well as he had visited Iran. The document does not indicate which year he did the visit but it is for sure after the year 1995 based on the context of the document. Other reporting from different sources said that there is an indication that Zawahiri visited Iraq in 1998, and this document confirms that he indeed visited Iraq. The document refers to him as Aymen but it is very clear he is Aymen Al Zawahiri because document mentioned that Aymen was the leader of Jihadists in Peshwar Pakistan and indeed Aymen Al Zahiri left Egypt in 1985 after his release from prison and went to Peshawar Pakistan to organize and lead some islamic terrorists there.

Saddam regime had established relations to Al Qaeda, and this is yet another important smoking gun about this relation. We have posted before on FR the Iraqi document that talked about a meeting between Bin Laden and the Iraqi Intelligence per Saddam authority where the meeting took place in Sudan in 1995. Only very few regimes had relation with Al Qaeda and Saddam regime was one of them. After 9/11 the President was absolutely right in removing this terrorist regime and the whole world is a better place without it.

This document is still up running on the harmony data base as you see in the link and it posted in both Original Arabic and its English translation. The Harmony Data Base list the captured AL Qaeda documents from Afghanistan published by “The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point” and it is different from the Docex/FMSO website of the Iraqi documents that was unfortunately shut last November.

I am very surprised that no one else in the Intelligence Community picked up on the content of this document that shows Ayam Al Zawahiri visit to Iraq. In fact the Senate Intelligence Committee per the influence of the democrats went all the way to deny that such a visit took place despite that they were reporting about it.

This is the SMOKING GUN.

Below are some excerpts form the document:

"…..Some of them went to Saddam; others went to Iran and so on…. When the rest knew that AYMEN is the leader, and at the same time he and the others knew of all the people that had been arrested during the past seven months and the government did not announce that until it gathered them and named the organization “Talae’ Al-Fath”… This is what happened on the outside of unbelievable events. AYMEN went to Iraq and Iran, and now he told Abu Mujahid Al-Filistini that he regretted writing “Al Hasad Al Mur” (Bitter Envy) and thinks that he rushed in…."

I just found this that give an absolute proof that Ayman refered to in the document is Ayman Al Zawahiri.

Among al-Zawahiri's works is a scathing attack on the moderate philosophy of the Muslim Brotherhood, titled Al Hasad al-Murr: al-Ikhwan al-Muslimoun fi Sittin Aman (The Bitter Harvest: The Muslim Brotherhood in Sixty Years). And that is from

Therefore the document which says that "Ayman is the Author of AL Hasad Al Mur (The Bitter Harvest)" is for sure Aymen Al Zawahiri.

Admin: Is there a way you can include this in the body of the original thread to further proof that this man mentioned in the document is for sure Aymen Al Zawahiri. That is the SMOKING GUN DOCUMENT and if all possible to move it to the breaking news section. Thank you very much.

15 posted on 04/29/2007 4:52:00 PM EDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)

TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedainiraq; alzawahiri; frwn; iraq; prewardocs; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: Anita1

Agree 100% with what you said.

81 posted on 04/30/2007 5:04:29 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

it is very possible.

82 posted on 04/30/2007 5:04:59 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

No Iraq-AlQaeda terrorism link here, move on - nothing to see...

83 posted on 04/30/2007 5:07:40 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
The left wing traitors and their media will only accept the following to prove that Saddam had WMD and relation to terrorism: The Finds of tens of thousands of already made Chemical Weapons, few nuclear bombs stored somewhere in Iraq, and all type of already made Biological weapons. If we found all the Precursors required to make Chemical Weapons hidden somewhere in Iraq, for them that is not enough.

A video tape of Saddam sitting with Bin Laden planning 9/11 terrorist attacks. Short of that they will tell us that Saddam had no relation with terrorism.

So no matter what Republicans bring out as evidence of Saddam continuous work on WMD programs or Saddam strong relation to terrorism, all is not enough for the democrats and their media if it does not meet the above criteria.

84 posted on 04/30/2007 5:10:50 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: fabian

Please read my post 84 on why it will not matter to democrats and their media if the President brings this one to the public or many other proofs of Saddam strong relation to terrorism and proofs of Saddam WMD programs.

85 posted on 04/30/2007 5:12:36 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jveritas


86 posted on 04/30/2007 5:17:58 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; jveritas; All
“I was just doing some research on this document and found out that Dan Darling pointed out back on February 16 2006 the significance of this document in an article in the Weekly Standard and he mentioned that Al Zawahiri visited Iraq and Iran according to the document. Although one thing is that Dan Darlign thought that the “doctor” referred to in the document was Al Zawahiri where indeed he is another person if you read the document carefully. Al Zawahiri was only called “Aymen” in the document. I am really surprised that the Intelligence Community did not include this very important document when they presented Al Qaeda-Saddam relation to the US Senate Intelligence Committee. They totally ignored it and the Senate report said that Zawahiri visit to Iraq was not proven. This document totally destroys this argumemt.”

I totally understand Jveritas frustration when he states the publics understanding of these translations are sloppy for two reasons. These documents are either translated wrong by inexperienced individuals that lack the ability to understand the full language or people are misinterpreting key words or key phrases. I like to sum it up metaphorically by using a humorous ad on YOUTUBE that kind of makes the point. As you watch the video imagine the German Coast Guard guy is translating these documents.

87 posted on 04/30/2007 6:04:14 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

but the press conference wouldn’t be for the die hard liberals; it would be for the people who are constantly bombarded with lies and doubt. Much like what Reagan did by going directly to the people to support his tax cuts.

88 posted on 04/30/2007 8:40:56 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Sadly your evaluation of the predictament are probably quite accurate. The demos know they have the backing of most of the world news services. Why would they want to cave in and change their agendas for the sake of giving the masses accurate news and editorials. It would go against their prime directive(s).

89 posted on 04/30/2007 9:21:43 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

—They will say “How do you know that Bush and Cheney did not send someone to put this forged document in an Al Qaeda camp and claim it is an Al Qaeda document”...—

If Bush & Cheney were that devious, they would have “planted” vials of Anthrax in Baghdad 5 years ago...

90 posted on 04/30/2007 9:29:01 AM PDT by rfp1234 (Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; All

No less than Former anti-terror chief Richard Clarke was convinced of a Saddam-AQ connection. Does “Boogie to Baghdad” ring a bell?

91 posted on 04/30/2007 9:33:22 AM PDT by sono (TITUS PVLLO in MMVIII - Paid for by the Aventine Collegium for Pullo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

What the DBM is not reporting ........


92 posted on 04/30/2007 10:17:26 AM PDT by malia (hillarycare: Our choice in healthcare will be taken from us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Can’t be true.

The Demodogs have assured me it ain’t so.

93 posted on 04/30/2007 10:44:44 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

The Democratic Party abandoned these wars when Kerry became their deemed war hero. It is imperative therefore that the democrats maintain their position and force the President to withdraw the troops.

The WOT is a contradiction for which the democrats cannot win. As did Pharaoh removed Moses’ name from all Egypt – so have the democrats determined for George Bush! They will not allow the US to achieve or even consider the WOT a winnable objective until they have completely and deliberately denigrated everything Bush! Hence the WOT must be extinguished and a new WOT properly designed by the democrats set forth against these enemies.

What will come of this evidence when they fall upon the deaf ears of those presently sitting in Washington?

How will this nation survive with such blinding arrogance willingly exposing the security and future of our nation? The democrats have sacrificed the lives our soldiers, innocent Iraqis, and the future or the Iraqi Government. They have knowingly handed Iraq over to Ahmadinejad and Khomeini consequently leaving Israel destined for full scaled war.

Harry Reid has declared the WOT is Lost and Over. He has declared Gen Petraeus a liar and puppet of the White House. What can anyone do to force these documents and other evidences to be reckoned with?

American Drifter

94 posted on 04/30/2007 11:23:21 AM PDT by American Drifter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Drifter

The Nazis won the propaganda war from 1933-1943 inside Germany and in many other countries in Europe and around the world.

95 posted on 04/30/2007 11:53:40 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: American Drifter

The traitors and their media cannot be convinced about anything good regarding this war even if God himself told him so. Their hate for President Bush has blinded their hearts, minds, and souls. They simply cannot accept the truth because the truth will shine upon their very dark world and expose their lies and deceits.

96 posted on 04/30/2007 11:57:23 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: American Drifter

Sorry wrong post, to the wrong person, on the wrong thread :)

97 posted on 04/30/2007 11:58:39 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; SunkenCiv

Thanks for the post & the ping

98 posted on 04/30/2007 7:58:15 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jveritas


99 posted on 05/01/2007 10:46:39 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Good info, but it won’t matter.

The lies have stood too long without resistance.. this will cause nothing more than a yawn.


100 posted on 05/01/2007 11:09:52 AM PDT by JWinNC (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson