Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear terror 'very real threat'
World Net Daily ^ | April 30, 2007 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 04/30/2007 10:59:14 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Lost in all the coverage of the Virginia Tech tragedy were the sobering words of Vice President Dick Cheney about a calamity facing America that will dwarf anything it has ever experienced as a nation.

Characterizing it as "the greatest threat we face," Cheney once again raised the ugly specter of nuclear terrorism against the U.S. "It's a very real threat," he said, "something that we have to worry about and defeat every single day." Tying the warning to politicking over Iraq war policy, he said a precipitous withdrawal from that country by U.S. military forces would invite and encourage the terrorists to follow Americans home. "The fact is that the threat to the United States now of a Sept. 11 occurring with a group of terrorists armed not with airline tickets and box cutters, but with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities, is the greatest threat we face," he said.

Coupled with this grave caution was another development that occurred under the media radar screen.

The U.S. Department of Energy announced it will donate radiation detectors to Mexico and help install them in busy seaports to prevent a terrorist attack with a nuclear weapon or "dirty bomb."

Why does the U.S. consider ports of entry into Mexico a national security threat to America?

Because, increasingly, Mexico receives cargo ships from China destined for the U.S. cargo is unloaded in Mexico and transported by land to the U.S. – mostly by trucks getting a free pass at the border thanks to the NAFTA superhighway plans.

Meanwhile, however, America's own ports are unable to screen the overwhelming number of cargo containers entering the country directly because of the sheer volume of imports.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Mexico; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; aliens; atombomb; borderfence; china; congress; defeatocrats; democrats; dickcheney; dirtybomb; gop; homelandsecurity; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; iran; iraq; islam; islamofascism; jihad; moonbats; nuclearweapons; republicans; richardcheney; terrorism; vicepresidentcheney; virginiatech; wmds
The defeatocrats fiddle while Rome burns.
1 posted on 04/30/2007 10:59:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wonder how long it’ll take for dems to realize that if the terrorists are going to use a nuke they’re going to target a city, such as NY...and the vast majority of democrat voters are in cities...such as NY. If the dems continue to ignore the truth it’s quite possible that their chances of winning any elections will be decreased once a city or two disappears. I hope it never happens, but as they say, it’s more a matter of when than if.
2 posted on 04/30/2007 11:07:00 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The U.S. Department of Energy announced it will donate radiation detectors to Mexico and help install them in busy seaports to prevent a terrorist attack with a nuclear weapon or "dirty bomb."

The Mexicans will love that. When they find nukes they can ask for really big bribes to allow the cargo to pass.

3 posted on 04/30/2007 11:13:30 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

ping


4 posted on 04/30/2007 11:20:59 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

>> The defeatocrats fiddle while Rome burns.

The Romans didn’t have the Free Republic nor the Holiday Inn Express for that matter.


5 posted on 04/30/2007 11:24:32 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Uh huh. I wouldn’t touch this with a ten foot pole.


6 posted on 04/30/2007 11:36:38 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The defeatocrats fiddle while Rome burns

He was not talking about Rome. He was talking about the U.S. Geeez

7 posted on 04/30/2007 11:54:13 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
publicly state that we will NUKE MECCA , if they nuke us anywhere . It is really the only deterrence . Just say it Mr. Prez.
8 posted on 05/01/2007 12:01:56 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It still ticks me off that the Hollywierdos changed Clancy’s plot in the movie and made the terrorists “right winged extremists” instead of keeping the jihadis in the book.


9 posted on 05/01/2007 12:10:39 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Watched the first season of “Sleeper Cell” tonight.
Terrific show in all senses of the word and really makes you think.


10 posted on 05/01/2007 12:34:51 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (The 21st Century has been a disappointment so far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus

I havent’ heard of this show. When does it come on?


11 posted on 05/01/2007 3:56:11 AM PDT by tippytoes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A nuclear attack on the U.S. (by Iran) is not just a threat, but is very real and "on countdown" mode IMHO....it's only a matter of time and is very scary...this from the book "Epicenter" by Joel Rosenburg...

(Quote)"With Iran's countdown to the apocalypse, the stakes could not be higher.

Were Iran to smuggle nuclear bombs across the Mexican border, for instance, entire American cities would be vulnerable to cataclysmic terrorist attacks with little or no warning. Experts say the blast from a single ten kiloton nuclear bomb in Washington, DC, for example, would destroy everything within a half mile of ground zero, contaminate 3,000 to 5,000 square miles with toxic levels of radiation, and kill 300,000 people within a matter of minutes."(/Quote)

Mr. Rosenburg goes on to say...

(Quote)"With a similar bomb detonated in the heart of Times Square in New York City, a leading expert on nuclear terrorism says, "The blast would generate temperatures reaching into the tens of millions of degrees Fahrenheit. The resulting fireball and blast wave would instantaneously destroy the theater district, the New York Times building, Grand Central Terminal, and every other structure within a third of a mile of the point of detonation. On a normal workday, more than half a million people crowd the area within a half mile radius of Times Square. A noon detonation in midtown Manhattan could kill them all. Hundreds of thousands of others would die from collapsing buildings, fire, and fallout in the ensuing hours. The electromagnetic pulse generated by the blast would fry cell phones, radios, and other electronic communications.(/Quote)

I am very very afraid for the future of our children and grandchildren...

12 posted on 05/01/2007 4:39:41 AM PDT by ~Vor~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ~Vor~
With a similar bomb detonated in the heart of Times Square in New York City, a leading expert on nuclear terrorism says, "The blast would generate temperatures reaching into the tens of millions of degrees Fahrenheit. The resulting fireball and blast wave would instantaneously destroy the theater district, the New York Times building, Grand Central Terminal, and every other structure within a third of a mile of the point of detonation.

Oh my God! The New York Times Building? We need to step up our diplomacy and make nice with these people!

13 posted on 05/01/2007 4:58:17 AM PDT by GWB00 (Barbara Streisand barely made it out of high school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GWB00
"Oh my God! The New York Times Building? We need to step up our diplomacy and make nice with these people!"

I know a lot of people like to joke about "liberal strongholds", and that's fine....I've thought the same thing myself..."no big loss....it's the NY Times" right?....However, when you stop to think of the magnitude of the loss of life, it really isn't funny. I don't care how liberal someone is, nobody would deserve to be "incinerated" in this manner...

14 posted on 05/01/2007 5:13:59 AM PDT by ~Vor~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ~Vor~

I hate to say this, but a nuclear detonation in the USA is the only way this country is going to finally wake up to the real threat of Islamic fascism to the world.

I thougth for a minute after 9/11 we had finally woken up. But we rolled over and the liberal demorats continue to hit the snooze button.

Only after one or more cities are destroyed will we finally take the gloves off and fight this war as it should have been fought after 9/11. NO MORE PC BS. You are either with us or against us. Then we can unlease the dogs of war on these sick b_stards like Amajenadad.

I pray everyday for our country and leaders to wake up, but I am afraid it is already too late.


15 posted on 05/01/2007 5:29:42 AM PDT by thepainster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thepainster
I totally agree with your post 100 percent...a lot of people today have the attention span of a nanosecond...and less than that if what's happening in the world doesn't involve them directly...something has to change...I don't have the answer...I wish I did...but I think we're all in deep trouble right now...

16 posted on 05/01/2007 5:35:20 AM PDT by ~Vor~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus

I wasn’t familliar with the show and had to look it up (I don’t spend much time in front of a TV). It looks pretty interesting.


17 posted on 05/01/2007 6:46:03 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tippytoes
I havent’ heard of this show. When does it come on?

It was started in 2005. I rented it on Netflix. I think any large video outfit will sell or rent the DVD's. I'm not sure that any channel is carrying it now.

18 posted on 05/01/2007 6:59:54 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (The 21st Century has been a disappointment so far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

19 posted on 05/01/2007 7:32:23 AM PDT by Gritty (We think we can just call off the game early, and go back home and watch TV - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

When they find nukes they can ask for really big bribes


Aw, common, they wouldn’t do that would they?


20 posted on 05/01/2007 7:38:59 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey (Believe nothing of what you hear or read and half of what you see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thepainster

I regretfully agree with but then again I have thought this for several years. It seems we always need a Pearl Harbor to yank us into the reality of what we face.

Regardless of what crap is put out by the left we are facing a very dire future with regard to a terorist nuclear attack. It is only a matter of time.

I does seem that other countries are waking up to the true threat of islam which is world conquest. Anyone that denies that islam is about world conquest is extremely naive or a liar.

I could almost cry now at just the thought of it. I also believe that when it happens they will have smuggled two devices in and that they will take out 2 out 3; the three being NYC, DC, or LA.

It will alternately be known in history as the time when the islamic peoples committed mass suicide.


21 posted on 05/01/2007 8:35:32 AM PDT by .44 Special (Ta Muid Buarch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
It still ticks me off that the Hollywierdos changed Clancy’s plot in the movie and made the terrorists “right winged extremists” instead of keeping the jihadis in the book.

Ticks me off too.

22 posted on 05/01/2007 8:43:15 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And meanwhile our borders are still wide open. On our watch.


23 posted on 05/03/2007 4:04:05 AM PDT by James W. Fannin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ~Vor~
Your right I am sure everyone thought the same thing,getting rid of the New York Times. But there is reason to be afraid and the liberals just don't get it.I am afraid for them, because the terrorists have told us they are going to kill as many Americans as they can. And they will go back to New York,I believe they take it as a challenge to them to keep going back to the same target.I always remember that New York was the birth place of abortion. But so many Americans have forgot what it felt like on 911 and now they hate Bush more than the terrorists.
24 posted on 05/06/2007 9:19:44 AM PDT by red irish (Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: red irish
"But so many Americans have forgot what it felt like on 911 and now they hate Bush more than the terrorists."

IMHO, I think Bush's favorability numbers would be a lot higher if it wasn't for the liberal media. They have an agenda and they are pushing it hard. They know most working folks don't have the time to really sit and listen to the news so it's all done in sound bites or in the way the print media title an article in the newspaper.

I voted for Bush twice as I did not want 8 years of Al Gore with more attacks on the U.S. going unanswered as they were during the Clinton years. I also firmly believe that the liberals are willing to do anything in their power to make sure that a republican President looks as bad, if not worse, than their impeached Mr. Clinton. Even at the expense of jeopardizing our national security. Everything they do is "pay back" for Clinton's impeachment. And remember, he was impeached. He just wasn't removed from office.

Let me say also I am not a Bushbot. I totally disagree with the way Bush has handled our immigration issues. Our borders should have been sealed shut immediately after 911, if not sooner, and I do not understand President Bush's way of thinking on this. Yes, I agree, a lot of our ancestors came through Ellis Island from other countries. But, it was a different time then. They came to better their lives. They wanted to work and speak our language and assimilate themselves into the American way of life. Not today. Today they come here expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter, and then have the nerve to complain that they aren't getting enough. Well, you know what, if they don't like what we have to offer, go the hell home!

25 posted on 05/07/2007 4:31:29 AM PDT by ~Vor~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ~Vor~

.................I am very very afraid for the future of our children and grandchildren...................

And yet, many, many conservatives believe that the most important issue to rally behind in 2008 is a candidates’ stance on abortion.

Folks, if we don’t belly up to the candidate that will squash islamofascism, we won’t be wanting to have any more children!


26 posted on 05/07/2007 5:17:52 AM PDT by aShepard (Oh little Mohammad, Couchy, Couchy Coo; your momma is so proud, you'll make the cutest little suici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson