he was there and he is an eyewitness to the truth
That he didn't see anything, sure.
But other eyewitnesses did, and have been supported by physical evidence recovered from the execution sites and the mass graves.
So attempting to rely upon Schouten to maintain an argument from ignorance is, as I said earlier, cluelessness on your part.
Yep, the Muhammedan troops fleeing from Srebrenica ran into subsequent Serbian forces and were dealt a severe defeat.
Sounds like a recipe for defeating the Jihadist and the Dhimmi scum who knee before them!
Is life as a Soros fluffer that rewarding to you?
Hey dhimmi man-—One honest eyewitness is worth more than all the media doctored Moore docs fantasy pics you can come up with.
Atrocity stories are a classic and effective way to motivate hatred agains an enemy you are out to destroy. Poland attacked Germany on 1 Septembr 1939, right? The British press in 1914 had “Huns” raping every maiden in Belgium. The “Ulster Massacre of 1641” was a hoax by London to foment hatred of the Irish; it was intended to “justify” all-out war for centuries on the Irish, citing numbers of victims that were astronomically in excess of the number of Protestants in Ireland. And then there’s that big hit ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which “proved” that Jews were out to exterminate Gentiles.
WHEN DID THE “PRESSTITUTES” (thanks for that to Ilana Mercer) FIRST START USING THE PHRASE The Srebrenica Massacre [of x-thousands of Muslim men and boys]?
When did the Srebrenica Massacre story break?
No reports from 10 July 1995 and the immediately ensuing days and weeks ever refer to the massacre of Muslim men and boys. The numbers ranged from 2,000 to 8,000 and 10,000...
From Iran, no mention of a massacre having taken place:
Iranian foreign minister [Velayati], in a message to the UN secretary-general, has asked for immediate action to PREVENT a massacre of the defenceless people of Srebrenica by the Serb rebels. SOURCE: Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1, Tehran, in Persian 0930 gmt 11 Jul 95; Source: Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran Network 1, Tehran, in Persian 0930 gmt 11 Jul 95; SECTION: Part 4 Middle East; THE MIDDLE EAST; IRAN; ME/2353/MED. Message to UN secretary-general. Text of report by Iranian TV on 11th July.
From the front, no mention of a massacre having taken place:
Reports from the front in mid-July 1995, e.g. Chris Hedges in the New York Times of 18 July 1995, reported that thousands of armed Muslim fighters slipped through Serb lines under fire and arriving safe in Tuzla, held by Muslim forces (and a US garrison).
The lag time between as yet unbaptized Srebrenica Massacre on 10-11 July 1995 and the first press reports is over a month. David Rohde, who spearheaded the story that became known as the Srebrenica Massacre, did not himself use any such phrase or make such a claim. In his story in the Guardian of 19 August 1995 we find I saw what appeared to be a decomposing human leg protruding from freshly turned dirt He repeated Albrights fabrication about a massacre in a soccer stadium in a nearby town, [where] human faeces, blood, and other evidence indicated large numbers of people were CONFINED, and PERHAPS shot. Also: United Nations official estimate that 4,000 to 6,000 Muslim men are still MISSING in the wake of the Srebrenica and Zepa ASSAULTS.
The news would have still been hot when Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote an Op-Ed piece in The New Republic of 7 August 1995, under the headline: AFTER SREBRENICA. Zbig Brzezinski says only that something awful MIGHT happen.
Nowhere does Brzezinski mention a Srebrenica massacre. That catch phrase does not appear until weeks after the alleged event. It will not be found in the press until the American-sponsored Croatian Storm (Oluja) on Serb Krajina in August-September 1995.
(In)Consistency: Madeleine Korbel Albright, whose Albright Group now has the franchise for the cell phone business in Kosovo, brought the earliest allegation of a POSSIBLE Serb massacre of Muslims on August 11, 1995. But the chief United States delegate to the United Nations told a closed session of the Security Council only that 2,000 to 2,700 MISSING “Bosnians” (i.e. Muslims; Serbs and Croats, like “Diocletian” are Bosnians, too) from the Srebrenica enclave MIGHT HAVE BEEN shot by the Bosnian Serbs. She did not use the formulation Srebrenica massacre.
So, the numbers in Albrights document and subsequent tellings and re-tellings are not consistent.
LEXIS-NEXIS searches now permit us to track down and date press reports on whatever story. Readers can see for themselves what results turn up in searches dated between 10 July 1995 and the beginning of October 1995, using parameters such as
(Srebrenica AND massacre)
(Srebrenica AND missing)
Srebrenica AND 7000 OR 8000)
(7000-8000 men and boys)
(Koranically, once boys attain the age of fifteen, they are warriors for Islam.) Remeber boy bombers in Israel.
Did the Srebrenica Massacre happen? Draw your own conclusions.
Why the absence of reports of a “Srebrenica Massacre”? Simple. There was nothing to report. That is, until the US needed a lie to smokescreen Europe’s biggst ethnic cleansing since World War II. This was “Storm”, i.e. Honest Bill Clinton’s US (MPRI) attack of August-September 1995 on Krajina’s native population, Serbs.
This was Europe’s biggest ethnic cleansing since World War II. It took a BIG Lie to conceal it, plus a bunch of presstitutes and a voyeuristic public that’s hooked on Cop TV shows, Judge Judy et al., Jerry Springer, Maurie Povich and RAPE headlines.
Mike Wallace and a score of other Free Pess newshawks went went to Srebrenica in 1995. He’s not one to miss a spectacular story. He didn’t file any.
REMEMBER THE MAINE-REMEMBER TONKIN GULF-REMEMBER JENIN