Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawful incest may be on its way (Santorum was right)
Boston Globe ^ | 5/2/2007 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 05/02/2007 10:27:48 AM PDT by Uncledave

WHEN THE BBC invited me onto one of its talk shows recently to talk about the day's hot topic -- legalizing adult incest -- I thought of Rick Santorum.

Back in 2003, as the Supreme Court was preparing to rule in Lawrence v. Texas, a case challenging the constitutionality of laws criminalizing homosexual sodomy, then-Senator Santorum caught holy hell for warning out that if the law were struck down, there would be no avoiding the slippery slope.

"If the Supreme Court says you have the right to consensual sex within your home," he told a reporter, "then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything."

It was a common-sensical observation, though you wouldn't have known it from the nail-spitting it triggered in some quarters. When the justices, voting 6-3, did in fact declare it unconstitutional for any state to punish consensual gay sex, the dissenters echoed Santorum's point. "State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are . . . called into question by today's decision," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the minority. Now, Time magazine acknowledges: "It turns out the critics were right."

Time's attention, like the BBC's, has been caught by the legal battles underway to decriminalize incest between consenting adults. An article last month by Time reporter Michael Lindenberger titled "Should Incest Be Legal?" highlights the case of Paul Lowe, an Ohio man convicted of incest for having sex with his 22-year-old stepdaughter.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: celebrateperversity; consentingadults; incest; onebranchfamilytrees; ricksantorum; sexpositiveagenda; slipperyslope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: Mrs.Z
Emotionally, it is incest. But we're talking legally............
21 posted on 05/02/2007 10:38:19 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

Marsha Brady? What would Cindy think?


22 posted on 05/02/2007 10:38:51 AM PDT by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
The state of Arkansas is rejoicing!!!!!!

West Virginia is in ecstasy!........

23 posted on 05/02/2007 10:39:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: juliej

Marsha!.....Marsha!.....Marsha!.......always Marsha!........


24 posted on 05/02/2007 10:40:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
It is not biological incest, but familial incest, if that is the best word. It would fall under the the Biblical list of what sexual contact is forbidden. But while the Bible is the foundation of our laws, it is not the law itself, so the State is free to act as it pleases, which it clearly does now more than ever.

Having said that, it should come as no surprise that the advocates of this change would choose a nonsense complaint to show why the change should be made. This has been the exact tactic towards the entire arena of laws that touch on sexual activity, the acme of which is that we allow millions of abortions for the sake of the few pregnancies that come from rape or incest.

25 posted on 05/02/2007 10:40:54 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Tennessee is not far behind them either.
26 posted on 05/02/2007 10:41:03 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

This is not incest. Come back when there is a real story. This is just for theatrics. An adult stepdaughter...no blood is not incest. I definitely don’t want people to pass laws that advocate incest but at least get a case that we can legitimately complain about.


27 posted on 05/02/2007 10:41:41 AM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
The homosexual agenda is only about painfully abusing innocent boys for a supposed increase of power.

How soon before America goes back to calling female traits, observations, and attitudes as "people's," not "women's," "girl's," or "female's," as not to offend homosexuals, as Oprah led us in the 90's?

28 posted on 05/02/2007 10:41:58 AM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (MY GOSH!! That's too CHEAP!!! :>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

I used to work with a woman who married her step-brother. They were raised together since they were about 10-years-old. Totally gave me the heebie-jeebies.


29 posted on 05/02/2007 10:42:32 AM PDT by Millee (Tagline free since 10/20/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave; NeoCaveman; Ouderkirk
I’m not advocating incest by any means, but prosecuting a man for having sex with his 22 year old step-daughter, as creepy as that is
 
In all fairness, you guys are way over the line calling it creepy if we haven't even seen what she looks like. 

Owl_Eagle

If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.

30 posted on 05/02/2007 10:42:41 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

“We need to bring shame back to its rightful place in society.”

It ain’t gonna happen anywhere this side of the Second Coming.


31 posted on 05/02/2007 10:44:27 AM PDT by oldfart (The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing left to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yes, and Woody Allen ended up marrying his. But think of the bizarre permutations of the definition of “family.” (Like we don’t have enough of those already.)


32 posted on 05/02/2007 10:44:35 AM PDT by Mrs.Z
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

“Greg and Marsha Brady could have had sex and it would not have been incest. I think incest pertains to blood kin.”

You are correct. Incest pertains to sexual relationshops involving blood kin, and blood kin only - be the “relationship” parent/child or sibling/sibling or, in most (if not all) states, cousin/cousin.


33 posted on 05/02/2007 10:44:44 AM PDT by DangerDanger ("I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Z

Abraham married his half-sister, Isaac and Jacob their cousins, and they all turned out okay........


34 posted on 05/02/2007 10:46:18 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DangerDanger

cousin/cousin?......1st,2nd,3rd?......


35 posted on 05/02/2007 10:47:15 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’ve heard Rudy can answer that.


36 posted on 05/02/2007 10:49:32 AM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

We can only hope...


37 posted on 05/02/2007 10:49:35 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: if his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
>>an Ohio man convicted of incest for having sex with his 22-year-old stepdaughter<<

What if the stepdaughter was 12 yrs. old when it started? What if this guy had been at the girl for years before she decided that was what she wanted at the time of this guy’s arrest? There must be some morality in the laws if society wants to protect the innocents.

Rick Santorum was definitely right about this slippery slope.

38 posted on 05/02/2007 10:50:21 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Millee
a woman who married her step-brother. They were raised together since they were about 10-years-old. Totally gave me the heebie-jeebies.

I knew a woman like that, married her older stepbrother, they'd been raised together from at least that age, maybe younger.

Yeah, it was....creepy.

39 posted on 05/02/2007 10:50:40 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Too blessed to be stressed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

???.....


40 posted on 05/02/2007 10:51:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson