Skip to comments.Block Nancy's Earmark
Posted on 05/07/2007 2:10:36 PM PDT by enough_idiocy
The Senate is considering the Water Resources Development Act of 2007. In it, there is an earmark benefiting Nancy Pelosi (§ 5054 of H.R. 1495). The earmark would redevelop part of San Francisco's waterfront. Within 5,400 feet and 9,000 feet of the area Nancy would have redeveloped, she owns properties with rental income around $3 million.
and ask for your Senator's office. Tell your Senator you want to make sure Nancy's earmark is permanently blocked.
Kill Nancy's earmark.They are:
1301 Sansome LLC Pelosi Real Estate Partnership Rent Income: $1 million (2005)
945 Battery LLC Pelosi Real Estate Partnership Rental Income: $1 million (2005)
901 Battery LLC Pelosi Real Estate Partnership Rental Income: $15,000 (2005)
45 Beiden Place Pelosi Real Estate Asset Rental Incone: $1 million (2005)
Get on the phone. Call 202-224-3121 and ask for your Representative's office. Tell your Representative you are opposed to Section 5054 of H.R. 1495 and want it struck at Conference. Tell your Representative to kill Nancy's earmark.
Call 202-224-3121 and ask for your Senator's office. Tell your Senator you want to make sure Nancy's earmark is permanently blocked.
So she apparently went to the Harry Reid School of Real Estate Development.
“House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) and his eight compatriots, all of whom have co-sponsored a bill that would require that America pay reparations to the people of Guam for - get this - the actions of the Japanese in World War II.
According to the bill (HR.1595, the “Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act”), the people of Guam:
suffered unspeakable harm as a result of the occupation of Guam by Imperial Japanese military forces during World War II , by being subjected to death, rape, severe personal injury, personal injury, forced labor, forced march, or internment.
For this reason (?), “the Secretary of the Treasury shall make payments” to WWII survivors and their descendants on Guam for the brutal actions of a third party.
Makes perfect sense, doesn’t it? After all, the US is the largest aid donor on the planet; it’s only logical that we should rebuild, repatriate, and reparate every country that has been hurt by every war that we can find. Let’s not stop with Guam - let’s include everybody from Carthage on up to the present. Should we pay reparations to the Koreans for the Mongol invasions of the 14th century, and to the Spanish for the loss of their Armada in 1588? Why not?
And while this bill holds up $126,000,000.00 for the repayment of the people of Guam for what the Japanese did (as well as $5,000,000.00 for “the Secretary of the Interior [to] establish a grants program [to]...award grants for research, educational, and media activities that memorialize the events surrounding the occupation of Guam during World War II, honor the loyalty of the people of Guam during such occupation, or both, for purposes of appropriately illuminating and interpreting the causes and circumstances of such occupation and other similar occupations during a war”), our soldiers can’t even get a dime in supplemental appropriations.
Way to go, Democrats. Your “blame America first” (even for things we have nothing to do with), anti-US soldier attitudes, actions, and mindsets have just been taken to a new level”
Sounds like she is bringing home the bacon alright; but just for her benefit.