Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired generals challenge GOP in ads
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/9/07 | Philip Elliott - ap

Posted on 05/09/2007 9:01:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 05/09/2007 9:01:32 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Retired Marine Lt. Col. Andrew Horne, right, at podium, speaks as members of VoteVets.org held news conference, Wednesday, May 9, 2007, in Manchester, N.H., to discuss their new Iraq war ad campaign. Three retired generals targeted a dozen members of Congress in a new ad campaign Wednesday, saying they can't support President Bush's policies in Iraq and expect to be re-elected next year. Brandon Friedman, 29, standing, left rear, an Army veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq, and veteran Joshua Lansdale, standing at center, look on. (AP Photo/Cheryl Senter)


2 posted on 05/09/2007 9:03:06 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... In FReeP We Trust ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

wesley clark is not a credible critic.

but, many others should be criticized, for example, general franks. he made big errors in judgement, not to mention that he’s a suck ass.


3 posted on 05/09/2007 9:03:34 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Gee. That’s some crowd.


4 posted on 05/09/2007 9:12:04 PM PDT by JennysCool ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Three retired generals and Weasely Clark.

Looks like the makings of a circle jerk to me.

These generals, who suddenly find their balls in retirement, should be called back to active duty and assigned to Northern Afghanistan or Western Iraq. Their sole duty would be to draw up battle plans to win the war.

Each plan would then be placed on the net and voted on.

The most popular plan would be given to the winning general where he can gather pieces of the Iraqi army to lead into, um, battle.


5 posted on 05/09/2007 9:13:54 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Hang the m’fn treasonous, dirty bastards.


6 posted on 05/09/2007 9:18:31 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Clark should be thrown back into active duty — in a chute out of the back of a C-130 over a hot zone -— the other guys, well hard to say what is motivating them — maybe some Soros money. Regardless of their feelings, they should have kept their mouths SHUT...if they had any concern for feelings for the guys who fought for them.

Their performance was disgusting to this vet.


7 posted on 05/09/2007 9:20:12 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Retired generals that run off at the mouth usally equate to REMFs that never led troops in battle. Just like that weasel Murtha.


8 posted on 05/09/2007 9:22:20 PM PDT by afnamvet (It is what it is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Where were these men of integrity; these paragons of virtue when Clinton was gutting the military? Better men/women than these left rather than serve a man hell bent on destroying the military.


9 posted on 05/09/2007 9:22:54 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I became politically aware sometime in the mid-eighties. I had been an avid reader of newspapers for some ten years before that. I had never read an article of dissident(sp?) generals during that time. What has changed?


10 posted on 05/09/2007 9:25:22 PM PDT by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Rwanda 1994, US turns its back, ~800,000 are slaughtered.

Rwanda 1994, US turns its back, ~800,000 are slaughtered.

Rwanda 1994, US turns its back, ~800,000 are slaughtered.

Rwanda 1994, US turns its back, ~800,000 are slaughtered.

Rwanda 1994, US turns its back, ~800,000 are slaughtered.

...


11 posted on 05/09/2007 9:29:00 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Foes say that Bush and Franks made these mistakes in Iraq but, what were these mistakes? Never hear exactly what they were.


12 posted on 05/09/2007 9:31:17 PM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat

read:

Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq by Michael R. Gordon and General Bernard Trainor (Paperback - Feb 27, 2007)

and then you’ll have an informed opinion.


13 posted on 05/09/2007 9:36:15 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ken21
Thanks for the tip, but, I am not a big fan of the wisdom of recently passed over General Officers. As Tony Snow said, “Their memoirs could all be called’If Only They Would Have Listened To Me!””
14 posted on 05/09/2007 9:48:45 PM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat
And they say the plan isn’t working.. but don’t offer a different plan for victory, just a plan for defeat? These Generals should be smarter then this. Do they not know the ramnifications the whole world faces if we leave Iraq the way it is? It’s not that doggone hard to see.
15 posted on 05/09/2007 9:53:41 PM PDT by GlennBeck08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What needs to happen is have retired General Franks and others who support the effort to run an ad. I wonder where exactly Weasley Clark and these other arm chair generals get their information to reach the conclusions they have reached. It is shameful.


16 posted on 05/09/2007 9:54:59 PM PDT by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

I bet none of these generals were even in Iraq.


17 posted on 05/09/2007 10:23:43 PM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ken21

“but, many others should be criticized, for example, general franks. he made big errors in judgement, not to mention that he’s a suck ass.”

Care to list the mistakes?


18 posted on 05/09/2007 10:55:55 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Of course the three former Generals are retired for a reason...and it most likely wasn’t their choice. Hell, Clark was fired by Clinton for attempting to start WWIII.


19 posted on 05/09/2007 11:11:11 PM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

Batiste and Eaton were. Eaton was fired for poor performance and replaced by then-MG Petraeus.


20 posted on 05/10/2007 7:45:23 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson