Skip to comments.
COMBAT CLIMATE CHANGE WITH FEWER BABIES – OPT REPORT
Optimum Population ^
| May 7 2007
Posted on 05/11/2007 4:04:22 PM PDT by Lukasz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Beware of the left :)
1
posted on
05/11/2007 4:04:25 PM PDT
by
Lukasz
To: xcamel; Tailgunner Joe; lizol; Grzegorz 246
2
posted on
05/11/2007 4:05:24 PM PDT
by
Lukasz
To: Lukasz
Now that’s an idea I like.
If all the tree-hugging granola munchers stop having children, we’ll have no problem.
3
posted on
05/11/2007 4:06:24 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: jdege
If liberals in general stopped having children, then we’d have no problems.
4
posted on
05/11/2007 4:10:06 PM PDT
by
PJBankard
(Americans love a winner, and will not tolerate a loser. -Gen. George Patton)
To: Lukasz
I've been wondering when the left would get around to this.
A society that no longer values children is a society with no faith in a future, no faith in God and no hope.
To: jdege
Amen. The leftist loons should definitely stop breeding and indoctrinating more of their ilk. They should send all their women to get neutered and themselves spaded, just to make sure. How many carbon offset credits can you get for getting fixed?
6
posted on
05/11/2007 4:10:40 PM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(FRED/ROMNEY 08-The Winning Ticket)
To: jdege
Do they have even children? Lol. Most of them are either aborting their babies or are homosexuals. That’s why they insist on controlling school, media and government, to indoctrinate our children.
7
posted on
05/11/2007 4:11:04 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
To: Lukasz
Providing low-carbon electricity for the 11 million extra UK households forecast for 2050 would mean building seven more Sizewell B nuclear power stations or 10-11,000 wind turbines. I suggest a two-pronged approach to the problem. Leftists can forgo having children, while the rest of us pay for new nuclear power plants.
8
posted on
05/11/2007 4:14:29 PM PDT
by
Logophile
To: Lukasz
Well, you better deport your muzzies then.
9
posted on
05/11/2007 4:17:06 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
To: Lukasz
Save the environment,
kill an environmentalist.
10
posted on
05/11/2007 4:19:41 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
To: Lukasz
How many less children could the Europeans have? Some countries are barely at replacement and others are below it. Except for certain ethnic groups within those countries...
To: colorado tanker
Remeber "The Population Bomb" from the '70s?
Okay, who is it that has that B & W graphic of the guy saying "Not this sh-- again?"
12
posted on
05/11/2007 4:24:53 PM PDT
by
oprahstheantichrist
(Stop calling them "liberals," they're Bolsheviks!)
To: tsmith130
In fact, the total fertility rate of the United Kingdom is only 1.6 or at most 1.7, which is already below replacement. I’m not sure they should say “Well done, but we can do more”, or pushing these down the throats of Pakis in their midst.
13
posted on
05/11/2007 4:28:07 PM PDT
by
NZerFromHK
(The US Founding is what makes Britain and USA separated by much more than a common language.)
To: Lukasz
We now have ability to purchase carbon credits; will child bearing credits soon be available?
14
posted on
05/11/2007 4:30:09 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: jdege
Has the lib writer considered that for every child not born of lib parents, 3-6 babies will be born of radical muslim parents. How soon will it be before the majority in the UK is Muslim.
What Hitler could not accomplish, Muslims could do within several generations - the conquest of England.
15
posted on
05/11/2007 4:31:00 PM PDT
by
Irish Queen
(Nevada Gal)
To: Irish Queen
The scary thing is that the United Kingdom’s national total is already 1.6 now which includes the “South Asians” rates. You could imagine the Pakistani populations having three or four kids and the rest...
16
posted on
05/11/2007 4:32:54 PM PDT
by
NZerFromHK
(The US Founding is what makes Britain and USA separated by much more than a common language.)
To: oprahstheantichrist
1970's? How about 200 years ago to Malthus? This crap has been going on for 200 years, every prediction has turned out wrong, but still they persist!
To: Lukasz
Okay, I didn’t procreate. How many carbon offsets will that buy me?
18
posted on
05/11/2007 4:34:39 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(Some people are like slinkys, the idea of them tumbling down a flight of stairs makes you smile.)
To: Lukasz
posted too many times already
19
posted on
05/11/2007 4:44:34 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: jdege; Lukasz
The natives just may stop having children but the folks comming from the Middle East, India and Africa are going to have boucoups of offspring.
Looks like the death of British society.
20
posted on
05/11/2007 4:47:07 PM PDT
by
oyez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson