Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Truman announces his candidacy for president--again.
Weekly Standard ^ | 05/21/2007

Posted on 05/12/2007 6:49:50 AM PDT by rhema



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hst; joemccarthy; mccarthy; mccathy; truman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2007 6:49:55 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema

If Harry were alive today he’d be a Republican. Can anyone imagine Harry S. Truman supporting a Party which advocated homosexual marriage? Or, abortion that is really infanticide? Or cutting and running from our obligations in the Middle East?

NEWSWEAK is right about one thing, we could use another Truman, and maybe his name is Fred Thompson.


2 posted on 05/12/2007 6:53:40 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

You mean Weekly Standard, right?


3 posted on 05/12/2007 6:56:22 AM PDT by SolidWood (Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Now there' s one democrat I could vote for.
4 posted on 05/12/2007 6:56:25 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
I think I can do business with Stalin. He's very honest, but he's also smart as hell.

At least Truman didn't claim to see into the man's soul.

5 posted on 05/12/2007 6:57:30 AM PDT by Pan_Yan (All grey areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

I don’t remember any Memorial hospital in KC. There is a Truman Medical Center, however.


6 posted on 05/12/2007 7:00:05 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood; kjo

Weekly World News


7 posted on 05/12/2007 7:00:05 AM PDT by uglybiker (relaxing in a cloud of quality, aromatic, pre-owned tobacco essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Senator Truman thought that he smelled a Rat when he found that certain war expenditures were "hidden". He didn't know what that darn Manhattan Project was all about but he suspected profiteering. He was called in front of FDR who told Truman to back off and trust me this is of national importance.

FDR would pick Truman to be his running mate in 1944 and in the Spring of 1945 when FDR passed President Truman now had a need to know and was briefed on the weapon that would change the world.

I remember, when I read his memoirs, that he believed that one of the key components of a President's policy positions was a reading of and appreciation for HISTORY!

I have q degree in History and a minor in Political Science. I hereby throw my hat in the ring. You won't be sorry!

8 posted on 05/12/2007 7:09:02 AM PDT by Young Werther ( and Julius Ceasar said, "quae cum ita sunt." (or since these things are so!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Yeah, I mean WEEKLY STANDARD; NEWSWEAK can’t even be right about one thing.


9 posted on 05/12/2007 7:09:33 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther

You got my vote.


10 posted on 05/12/2007 7:10:39 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kjo
"If Harry were alive today he’d be a Republican. "

That's only fair. If Mussolini were alive today he'd be a democrat.

11 posted on 05/12/2007 7:12:03 AM PDT by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema

He’d get my vote in a New York minute.


12 posted on 05/12/2007 7:24:00 AM PDT by CeasarsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Can anyone imagine Harry Truman in a party whose elected members refused to close the borders, and prosecuted its own border agents and Marines for attempting to kill the enemy?


13 posted on 05/12/2007 7:26:54 AM PDT by James W. Fannin (unappeasable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema
As the DEMs continue to rewrite history, it's important to remember some of the significant DEM positions during the election of 1948.

The majority of leading DEMs and especially those in the South were violently opposed to Truman's stated civil rights positions.

VP Henry Wallace ('41-'45) is an example of the DEMs even then... he would have been POTUS if he had remained VP in 1944 with FDR's pending death. Wallace ran against Truman in '48 on three major issues; Turn our nukes over to the United Nations, nationalize all the railroads and coal mines, and provide huge reconstruction funding for the Soviet Union.

Just few points from McCullough's book Truman.

Harry bears little resemblance to today's DEM traitors.

14 posted on 05/12/2007 7:33:59 AM PDT by nctexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Harry’s conduct at Postdam was pure Democrat Party “roll over and play dead” tactics. Read his impressions of Stalin at this time...disgraceful.


15 posted on 05/12/2007 7:37:20 AM PDT by AnnGora (E-Harmony.com reject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Hmmm. Methinks the Weekly Standard is parodying some Republicans who are pining for another Ronald Reagan. I haven’t heard any Dems looking for another Harry.


16 posted on 05/12/2007 7:39:12 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
I was a poorly trained doggie in Truman’s miserable Army in Korea.

Much better to be in Bush’s highly trained Army and get more respect from the Marines.

17 posted on 05/12/2007 7:39:29 AM PDT by Griddlee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“Some day we’ll awake, have a reformation of the heart, teach our kids honor and kill a few sex psychologists, put boys in high schools with men teachers (not cissies), close all the girls finishing schools, shoot all the efficiency experts and become a nation of God’s people once more.”

From Truman’s diary some time in the 30’s


18 posted on 05/12/2007 7:40:08 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James W. Fannin

He might suspect the loyalty of some soldiers if they didn’t kill the enemy efficiently enough but merely “attempted.” A new degree of political correctness unfortunately now binds us.


19 posted on 05/12/2007 7:41:34 AM PDT by dufekin (Name the leader of our enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AnnGora

And to think: Truman was more Republican than our current crop. (Think “roadmap.”)


20 posted on 05/12/2007 7:45:25 AM PDT by James W. Fannin (unappeasable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson