To: RussP; Alamo-Girl
Naturalism as a hypothesis is fine, but as a premise it is nothing more than a dogma.
Excellent insight, RussP! IMHO You really hit the bull's-eye here....
Thank you so very much!
posted on 05/19/2007 10:03:27 AM PDT
by betty boop
("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein.)
To: betty boop
Well, thanks. I certainly appreciate your insights too.
Most hard-core evolutionists don’t understand the difference between a hypothesis and a premise. Then they have the hubris to claim that “philosophy” is obsolete when if fact they simply fail to understand its most basic principles.
posted on 05/19/2007 11:02:29 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson