What difference would you have in evolution if life started 1) naturally, 2) seeded from outer space, or 3) by some divine intervention?And this led you to debate the three choices. The actual answer is that evolution could proceed as described with any of these three origins -- because evolution involves change, not origins."
Which proves that 'evolution' means absolutely nothing at all. It's the old bait-and-switch routine played upon credulists. Nothing more.
You are wrong (again). You seem to have missed the entire meaning of my post. Please try again, and read for comprehension this time.
Nope. Got it right on. You yourself said that evolution means 'change', nothing more. Big deal. A created biology that is fragmenting and accumulating errors is 'changing'.
If you had a point, you would have made it. Hand-waving and pretending to have a point doesn't cut it.