Skip to comments.
Court: Web site liable for postings
GOPUSA ^
| May 17, 2007
| UPI Staff (United Press International)
Posted on 05/17/2007 9:03:16 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
They don’t even use the words “Ninth Circuit” anymore.
3
posted on
05/17/2007 9:04:40 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
4
posted on
05/17/2007 9:05:49 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: AmishDude
Are you sure it was the circuit court?
6
posted on
05/17/2007 9:06:44 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
So if you want a pretty girl for a roommate, you can’t complain if they give you a whip-wielding transvestite instead?
Or if three college girls want a fourth girl, they’re not allowed to say so?
7
posted on
05/17/2007 9:06:59 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
8
posted on
05/17/2007 9:07:18 AM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Am I confused? I can advertise for a roommate, but I can’t specify that it needs to be a woman? Bet I can mention non-smoking! LOL
9
posted on
05/17/2007 9:08:06 AM PDT
by
trimom
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The “race” and “religion” parts will probably survive appeal.Not sure about the “sexual orientation” part.But the “sex” part will be thrown out for sure.
10
posted on
05/17/2007 9:08:29 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
To: Cicero
You can't advertise what you want. They just have to interview everyone and reject those you don't want for "unspecified personality differences".
11
posted on
05/17/2007 9:09:34 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
To: HEY4QDEMS
>>>Are you sure it was the circuit court?
Second Paragraph: “A three-judge panel of the federal appeals court...”
That’s the 9th Circus...
12
posted on
05/17/2007 9:09:47 AM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Then vs Now: Tokyo Rose - Baghdad Harry Reid)
To: Cicero
Apparently, the Fair Housing Act implicity covers more than just landlords.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Cicero
implicity = implicitly d-oh!
To: Keith in Iowa
I just noticed that, thanks.
15
posted on
05/17/2007 9:12:10 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: HEY4QDEMS
9th Circus is THE Federal appeals court in SF:
Beautiful building. Crappy neighborhood. Lousy decisions.
To: HEY4QDEMS
Well, it does say “A three-judge panel of the federal appeals court.” I was under the impression that an appeals court IS a circuit court.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Liberals are so concerned with an individuals right to choose1
To: trimom
Bet they won’t allow you to specify “smoking.”
To: Ender Wiggin
Only when it concerns abortions, sexual partners, or drugs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson