Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolfowitz to Resign -- Effective June 30..
Drodge

Posted on 05/17/2007 3:14:10 PM PDT by yoely

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-138 next last
To: Non-Sequitur

Yep. Done in by a woman, I think. He lets himself be led around by the nose by some of them.


51 posted on 05/17/2007 5:16:17 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: burzum

well said - no one brought this up, but his screeching and clinging to the chandelier instead of resigning when the time was right didn’t do our country much good. i hope he’s happy. bitter guy.


52 posted on 05/17/2007 5:18:10 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Read the rest of my posts on the thread, or even a few of the other informed ones; from others, like me, who have gone to sources beyond the LameStreamMedia to learn what has actually taken place, vis-a-vis Wolfowitz and the World Bank.


53 posted on 05/17/2007 5:19:15 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Of course not, you have nothing from which anyone would obtain and education.


54 posted on 05/17/2007 5:20:36 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

If you weren’t so eager to pick a fight you might realize that we’re basically in agreement. Anyway, rage on if that’s what pleases you....


55 posted on 05/17/2007 5:23:07 PM PDT by clintonh8r (It is better to be feared than to be respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

“If you weren’t so eager to pick a fight you might realize that we’re basically in agreement. Anyway, rage on if that’s what pleases you....”

If you were NOT so eager to invoke a fight you would not have been so oblique in your statements.


56 posted on 05/17/2007 5:29:09 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"I thought he said he would not resign. Wuss."

I think he did say that. Maybe he has something more than seeing that his girlfriend got a great big raise that he doesn't want to come out.

57 posted on 05/17/2007 5:40:01 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yoely

Maybe Robert Mugabe could take over at the World Bank. I think he meets the high exacting moral standards of the UN and the World Bank.


58 posted on 05/17/2007 6:03:04 PM PDT by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
or never give your girl friend a big fat raise

He didn't give her a raise.

59 posted on 05/17/2007 6:07:37 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
So what? He’ll wind up with another “provided for” position with a hedge fund, a bank, a private equity firm because all these b....... in government from every administration are all in it together.

Nope. With his credentials I'm sure he'll find another job. He doesn't need anyone to "provide" him anything.

60 posted on 05/17/2007 6:10:39 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: yoely

Wolf is a good man. Sorry to see him go.


61 posted on 05/17/2007 6:35:20 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Amazing to me how so many people will just friggin' swallow the swill reported by the LameStream Press...don't you agree?
62 posted on 05/17/2007 6:36:15 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Moral of the tale......never underestimate hardball-playing Euro-Arachnids with the power to write unlimited checks and to spin sticky webs.

BuHuHaHa!

Well, we Euro-Arachnids fund 60% of the WB. Therefore we have naturally some influence.

Best wishes from the other side of the big pond. :)

A.B.

63 posted on 05/17/2007 6:53:37 PM PDT by Atlantic Bridge (In varietate concordia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yoely

I’m afraid I blame Bush on this, once again.

Wolfowitz did nothing wrong. He was forced out because he wouldn’t go along with their policies of using the World Bank to promote family planning, abortion, and condom distribution. Therefore he had to go, because he didn’t like to use the bank to kill of third world populations.

Evidently Bush instructed Tony Snow to go out and say that Wolfowitz was on his own. When Bush pulled his support, that was the end of it.

Instead of defending his loyal people, Bush has backed down repeatedly in the face of left wing pressure.


64 posted on 05/17/2007 6:57:35 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoely; All
Since arriving at the bank, Wolfowitz has argued that the biggest barrier to development in many poor countries is a high level of government corruption.

“Corruption is often at the very root of why governments do not work,” Wolfowitz argued in a speech in Indonesia in April 2006.

"Wolfowitz wanted to change the rules in the middle of the game," says a French official who asked to remain anonymous while discussing the Congo negotiations. The World Bank Board, the official says, told Wolfowitz, "You cannot work like this."

The French and other European government representatives argued forcefully that the World Bank needed to remain engaged in poor countries such as Congo, regardless of how corrupt their governments may be.

The Wolfowitz argument that fighting corruption is a prerequisite for ending poverty is diametrically opposed to the views of many Bank professionals.

"The World Bank is a development institution, not an anti-corruption institution," says Dennis de Tray, who left the bank in 2006... http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9525865

65 posted on 05/17/2007 6:59:11 PM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“Evidently Bush instructed Tony Snow to go out and say that Wolfowitz was on his own. When Bush pulled his support, that was the end of it.”

Especially since the US President gets to replace him, it makes sense that at some point the president just let him go.


66 posted on 05/17/2007 7:01:22 PM PDT by cccp_hater (Just the facts please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Good idea...if that was the truth in this matter.


67 posted on 05/17/2007 7:01:46 PM PDT by Fledermaus (The Republican party is dead! Let's start over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: anglian

Not a surprise. We know that the French like to work with corrupt third world governments.


68 posted on 05/17/2007 7:05:55 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: anglian

He doesn’t have any idea about the dynamics of corruption. He should read some of Hernando de Soto’s studies about how corruption happens and what it’s a byproduct of on .. surprise, the World Bank’s site. It’s obvious he’s not familiar with the material.


69 posted on 05/17/2007 7:10:38 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

He’s got book deals and the lecture circuit just waiting for him, and will have ample opportunity to settle scores.

I’m confident he will.


70 posted on 05/17/2007 7:13:38 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Resign my rusty red rear!!! This jackass should be in jail!!!
He took OUR money and gave his ho the dough! That is EMBEZZELMENT!!!


71 posted on 05/17/2007 8:16:49 PM PDT by Dutch Tulip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yoely

The most puzzling question about this whole thing is, why would anyone have sex with Paul Wolfowitz?


72 posted on 05/17/2007 8:21:26 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Tulip
Resign my rusty red rear!!! This jackass should be in jail!!! He took OUR money and gave his ho the dough!

The ethics committee not only cleared, but demanded that Wolfowitz take the very action for which he is now held up for international opprobrium.

In a July 22, 2005, ethics committee discussion memo, Mr. Danino noted that “there would be two avenues here for promotion-an ‘in situ’ promotion to Grade GH for the staff member” and promotion through competitive selection to another position.” Or, as an alternative, “The Bank can also decide, as part of settlement of claims, to offer an ad hoc salary increase.”

July 27, ethics committee chairman Ad Melkert formally advised Mr. Wolfowitz in a memo that “the potential disruption of the staff member’s career prospect will be recognized by an in situ promotion on the basis of her qualifying record . . .” In the same memo, Mr. Melkert recommends “that the President, with the General Counsel, communicates this advice” to the vice president for human resources “so as to implement” it immediately.

And in an August 8 letter, Mr. Melkert advised that the president get this done pronto: “The EC [ethics committee] cannot interact directly with staff member situations, hence Xavier [Coll, the human resources vice president] should act upon your instruction.” Only then did Mr. Wolfowitz instruct Mr. Coll on the details of Ms. Riza’s new job and pay raise.

It was a kangaroo court. The Europeans and bank staff thought they could get him to leave quietly if they smeared him and Ms. Riza enough in the press. But he has fought back to clear his name, the Europeans led by Dutch politician Herman Wijffels have decided to ignore evidence to justify their one-sided conclusions.

Needless to say, none of this context has appeared in the media smears suggesting that Mr. Wolfowitz pulled a fast one to pad the pay of Ms. Riza. Yet the record clearly shows he acted only after he had tried to recuse himself but then wasn’t allowed to do so by the ethics committee. And he acted only after that same committee advised him to compensate Ms. Riza for the damage to her career from a “conflict of interest” that was no fault of her own.

73 posted on 05/17/2007 8:45:44 PM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Tulip

Please enlighten yourself by reading post #38. Everything Wolfowitz did (actually, was forced to do by the World Bank “ethics” officer even though he asked out of it) was aboveboard and approved by others. That is not “EMBEZZELMENT” as you say, which by the way could be considered libel. You should be more careful, not to mention informed.


74 posted on 05/17/2007 8:46:19 PM PDT by vrwc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Moral: Never piss off the corrupt, entrenched bureaucrats.


Like he wasn’t?

He’s getting an easy pass around here.


75 posted on 05/17/2007 8:49:49 PM PDT by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Tulip; All

This jackass should be in jail!!!


Even worse. ...a dumbass. And a dangerous dumbass.

Here is the best analysis I have found of this dangerous fool

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/016236.php


76 posted on 05/17/2007 9:02:01 PM PDT by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: yoely

Soros Socialists hate Wolfowitz.


77 posted on 05/17/2007 9:04:18 PM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
"In Iraq, that weakening of the Camp of Islam and Jihad can only be achieved by an American withdrawal."

So I take it you agree with the above?

If so I suggest you read the NIE report. It states a withdrawel would make things worse.

78 posted on 05/17/2007 10:01:29 PM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

That article had almost nothing to do with Wolfowitz and the World Bank. It was primarily concerned with complaining about the Bush administration’s approach to the Iraq war. So I’m not sure why you posted it on this thread.


79 posted on 05/17/2007 10:11:20 PM PDT by vrwc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Beat you to it by 11 days. FR Thread: Deal Is Offered for Chief’s Exit at World Bank: Post 3

I hear John Bolton is available. ;)
A deal is a deal, fellas. ;)

80 posted on 05/17/2007 10:58:48 PM PDT by anymouse (Do I really need to add a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

I won’t label her muslim. She is Arab, but she is secular, fighting for women rights in the Muslim world and supporting democratic development. That’s contrary to anything Islam stands for.

Funny fighting for women’s rights in America is called Feminism. Boy the World here on FR has gone crazy.


81 posted on 05/18/2007 12:03:23 AM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

>>Why should our money go to this corrupt organization?

That’s a good question. Why does our money go to the World Bank?

All they seem to do is create more urban concrete jungles that our troops will have to deal with.


82 posted on 05/18/2007 12:35:15 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I had no idea that he was forced out for the reasons you cited. Can you give me a source on that?

I would have bet my bottom dollar that loans would have been conditioned on accepting those "programs" aimed at reducing the populations of third world countries. If I was wrong I will need to reevaluate my assessment system before I bet any money on anything.

83 posted on 05/18/2007 12:57:31 AM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: yoely
Why is this even news? Breaking even? Who cares.. as if this impacts any of our lives. big whoop... he will leave, someone will take his place... such is the way of the world.. move on..
84 posted on 05/18/2007 1:07:42 AM PDT by cdnerds (cdnerds.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Not to belabor this topic, but his being a “good man” is your opinion. Not everyone holds the same opinion.

~ And yes, he has the credentials to be hired by whomever he wants, but they all do stick together and provide for each other to a nicety.

Have a good day.


85 posted on 05/18/2007 4:23:29 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Question for you please, since you seemed to be very informed on this (my stepmom is a WB employee so I want to be prepared).

I always thought this editorial in the WSJ was good: http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009948

My question is - it’s about a month old - has anything come out since then that contradicts anything in this article?


86 posted on 05/18/2007 5:31:05 AM PDT by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Wuli; clintonh8r
If you were NOT so eager to invoke a fight you would not have been so oblique in your statements.

...and clintonh8r fails to realize that he's also annoyed third-parties reading the thread, who see the oblique comments as merely hot air.

87 posted on 05/18/2007 5:39:08 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: yoely
It's funny. Whenever I hear the name WOLFOWITZ the image of CNN's Wolf Blitzer springs to mind. LOL
88 posted on 05/18/2007 5:48:33 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

or never give your girl friend a big fat raise

Was she that good?


89 posted on 05/18/2007 7:01:10 AM PDT by GOPologist (By the time you decide to look for greener pastures, you're too old to climb the fence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
The most puzzling question about this whole thing is, why would anyone have sex with Paul Wolfowitz?

Money.

90 posted on 05/18/2007 7:03:06 AM PDT by JackDanielsOldNo7 (On guard until the seal is broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: yoely

It’s the World Bank itself, that needs to resign.


91 posted on 05/18/2007 7:07:11 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I have to agree with posters on the thread who said this was a “railroad job”. From all reports, Wolfie was always above board about what was going on when he spoke with the bank’s board about the possible conflict of interest, and the board was aware throughout of the deals that had been worked. I believe the board should have had the integrity to say, “Yeah, we knew about it, we approved it, and we’ll take the heat if ‘the public’ doesn’t like it. We’ll all resign if you like because of our error of judgment”

Nothing has become public that either Wolfie or his girlfriend did anything the board wasn’t aware of.

92 posted on 05/18/2007 7:49:35 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Atlantic Bridge
Not all Euros are “Arachnids”. However, those in power at the World Bank seem very good at spinning webs.
93 posted on 05/18/2007 7:50:17 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Where have you been? - He automatically ordered her promotion to staff level H, and raised her pay from $132,660 to $180,000.


94 posted on 05/18/2007 7:53:11 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

That’s a nice story.

Have you any reputable references to back it up?

Thanks.


95 posted on 05/18/2007 7:59:04 AM PDT by Air Force Brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: saradippity

Basically, just about all the international aid organizations have family planning as their central mission. And regretably, for the liberals who control them, family planning is a euphemism for reducing population.

Even USAID, after 7 years with Bush in office, spends a large part of its money peddling condoms and strong-arming pro-life governments in places like South America to try to force them to legalize abortion. It’s a constant struggle.

The Europeans have a very liberal take on family planning, and of course so did the clintons. Hillary was a major presence at the meetings in Cairo and Beijing that pushed family planning and the rights of women to have abortions.


96 posted on 05/18/2007 8:18:30 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Air Force Brat

Try re-reading the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily and the New York Sun, particularly their editorial, pages since the beginning of the issue. The WSJ has done the most in delineating the pre-existing, and continuing nepotism in the World Bank as well as the corrupt history, in international development aid, of the major European actors, currently and formerly part of the World Bank, who have created this non-scandal due to their political opposition to Wolfowitz and his heightened attempts to place more requirements for governmental reform and anti-corruption measures in the recipient countries, into more World Bank funding projects.


97 posted on 05/18/2007 8:19:16 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: elc
"I always thought this editorial in the WSJ was good: http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009948....." My question is - it’s about a month old - has anything come out since then that contradicts anything in this article?"

Nothing has come forward to contradict what WSJ then wrote, but there has been more than once-a-week additional reporting on the case, by the WSJ editors, confirming and butressing what they wrote then. Including, demonstrating the very nuanced statements made to Wolfowitz, particularly by the head of the ethics committee, and by which that person has re-framed those comments to Wolfowitz, in his reporting on them to the other board members, as only his thoughts on the matter and not advice to Wolfowitz; in spite of the fact that his role and the reason he was approached by Wolfowitz is precisely because he is supposed to represent the board's advice on ethics matters - not merely his personal opinion to which no concern need be given. In addition, apparently some bank employees, having read the WSJ reports on the issue, contacted the WSJ editors with inside information on the Wolfowitz issue and information about previous and current nepotism (and promotions due to that nepotism) at the bank, some which involves some current directors sitting in judgement of Wolfowtiz. I suggest you try to obtain links to their editorial pages, every day since April 16th. If you can't, let me know, I might have stored links to many of them, and if WSJ has not moved them, I will send them to you.

98 posted on 05/18/2007 8:35:45 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
I think the problem is what you've posted is incomplete and misleading.

My understanding is that the $50K raise, guaranteed 8% raise per annum, and guarantee of a future job and raise upon return to the World Bank are absolutely extraordinary. It's the magnitude of the financial rewards that Wolfowitz demanded for his paramour that led to this problem. If he had not done that, I doubt any of this would have transpired.

It looks wrong because it is wrong.

Moreover, it shows astounding arrogance and tone-deafness on Wolfowitz's part to have done it. That's not the kind of behavior any organization -- business or otherwise -- wants to have at its head.

99 posted on 05/18/2007 8:47:26 AM PDT by Air Force Brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

Ping-a-ling to this article:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1835804/posts


100 posted on 05/18/2007 8:57:01 AM PDT by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson