Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair tipped to be World Bank president as disgraced Wolfowitz resigns
Daily Mail ^ | 5/18/2007 | James Chapman

Posted on 05/18/2007 8:50:09 AM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Tony Blair may be asked to head the World Bank after its president quit in a sleaze row.

One of America’s top economists today revealed that the retiring prime minister is being considered as a replacement for disgraced Paul Wolfowitz.

Nobel prize-winner Joe Stiglitz, a former senior vice president at the World Bank, said: "He is one of the people that is clearly being discussed."

Mr Blair is expected to cash in on his international contacts after quitting Downing Street on 27 June and his agent said he would quit as an MP if "a big international job" came up.

Mr Stiglitz said the World Bank would probably prefer an economist with experience in development - which some pundits argue effectively rules out the prime minister, who has often admitted to being shaky at maths.

Nevertheless, Prof Stiglitz said: "He is one of the people that is clearly being discussed.

"I think it would be good for the institution at this juncture if they had somebody who was an economist who really understood what development was entailed and could work closely with the staff that has been very alienated by Paul Wolfowitz over the last two years and bring together the institution.

"It wouldn't rule (Blair) out but I would say that if I were going through a first priority list of priorities it would probably begin with somebody with real experience in development.

"But Blair has clearly been a political leader that has the kinds of connections that one needs, that would be useful as head of the institution."

Embattled World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz agreed to quit last night over a favouritism row involving his girlfriend.

The move ended weeks of intense pressure on the former U.S. deputy defence secretary, a close ally of President Bush and an architect of the Iraq war.

He had faced furious criticism after details emerged of his role in securing a promotion and pay rise for his partner, Oxford-educated Shaha Riza, when he joined the bank in 2005.

Bank sources said Mr Wolfowitz will leave on June 30 with a £200,000 pay-off and a face-saving compromise in which the bank takes part of the blame for the scandal.

They said the bank accepted it should have sorted out the details of a deal which moved Miss Riza to the State Department before Mr Wolfowitz actually took over.

The terms of her pay rise and promotion should have been set by the personnel department and not left to the bank president.

Mr Wolfowitz’s depsaidarture was announced as a key ally of Gordon Brown, Tom Scholar, faced similar claims of using his World Bank post to secure promotion for his girlfriend.

Mr Scholar, who was the Chancellor’s private secretary, is tipped for a top job in Downing Street when Mr Brown becomes premier.

Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal published an email it said was sent to bank bosses last year by an unnamed colleague.

It said: "Please know that UK ED (executive director) Tom Scholar is continuing an affair with (a bank employee).

"This woman has been given preferential treatment in (the department) because of her relationship with this powerful ED, this affair is well-known, and is in violation of the bank staff rules and the board’s standards of conduct."

The newspaper, which has supported Mr Wolfowitz throughout the controversy, another complaint, possibly-from the same person, was filed this week.

It claimed: "Mr Scholar has used his privileged position as an executive director to influence bank staff to manipulate Ms –’s job description in a way to suit her limited professional qualification.

"Without Mr Scholar’s intervention she would clearly not occupy her present position. Several staff members have reported these facts ... these complaints have been ignored."

Mr Scholar, 37, is a member of the board that oversees the work of the bank and had been deliberating Mr Wolfowitz’s fate. He firmly denied any wrongdoing.

He insisted: "There is no conflict of interest. As an executive director, representing my government at the World Bank, rather than a member of staff or management, I do not have any supervisory responsibility for bank staff beyond the five in my immediate office.

"I am not the supervisor of my partner, either directly or indirectly. We have never come into professional contact and I have made arrangements to avoid any possibility of professional contact.

"Since I am not a member of staff or management, I could never be involved in any individual personnel decision affecting her. And I have never discussed or made reference to any such issue with anyone who could possibly be involved."

There were suspicions that he may be the victim of a smear campaign by supporters of Mr Wolfowitz, who believed he was forced out unfairly by European governments.

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blair; wolfowitz; worldbank

1 posted on 05/18/2007 8:50:14 AM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
We've had the Victorian Age, the Industrial Age, and the Information Age.

We have entered the Demagoguery Age.

2 posted on 05/18/2007 8:52:34 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Oh, great. Freepers may think of Tony Blair as the guy who stood with us in Iraq (although I think he liked standing with clinton in Yugoslavia better).

But he’s also a Labourite, with a very liberal domestic program, and a strong supporter of homosexuals. He pushed through the bill lowering the age of homosexual consent for minors against strong opposition, and more recently he pushed through laws forcing the Catholic Church in England to condone sexuality or abandon many of its activities.

He can be counted on to return the World Bank to the extreme liberal activities that Wolfowitz opposed, especially “population planning” i.e. population control and forced abortions.

3 posted on 05/18/2007 9:06:28 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

It’s an old saying, “don’t **** where you eat.” Duh.

4 posted on 05/18/2007 9:06:38 AM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

LOL!? They smeared and set-up Wolfowitz largely because of his role in the Iraq war and now they’ll get “Bush’s poodle” on Iraq in return?

5 posted on 05/18/2007 9:07:35 AM PDT by SolidWood (Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
"...a replacement for disgraced Paul Wolfowitz."

Many of the articles written about Jack Abramoff described him as "disgraced" so now the media is picking up that term for Wolfowitz. Funny how "disgraced" is never used in connection with George Soros even though he is technically a convicted felon.

6 posted on 05/18/2007 9:08:49 AM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks

Even funnier how they use the term disgraced after he was cleared of all charges. Hmmmm and I heard his replacement was going to be Soros flunky Malloch Brown, talked about discgraced, he of the Oil for Food scandal.

7 posted on 05/18/2007 9:13:09 AM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Wolfowitz has been around long enough to know that perception is everything. Regardless of him consulting with the ethics committee, he knew better than to pull a clintoonian like this. Shame on him!

8 posted on 05/18/2007 9:14:42 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is a horrible idea. It would be the first non-American to serve in that role and would establish the precedent that the EU socialists can drive out of office anyone they do not like. Screw them. Bush should appoint Paul Volker or John Bolton.

9 posted on 05/18/2007 9:21:32 AM PDT by magoo70804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
The last thing the World Bank needs is a development economist, that is, someone with a proven failed approach.

John Bolton for World Bank president!!!

10 posted on 05/18/2007 9:44:00 AM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks

Bill Clinton made his wife head of an enormous health care task force. That’s more than just a promotion. JFK made his brother Attorney General. Bill Clinton had Vernon Jordan get Monica Lewinsky a high paying job, whereas she was formerly an unpaid intern. Cronyism is an unavoidable aspect of government and business. Miss Riza is an accomplished professional who deserved a promotion as much as her highness HRC.

11 posted on 05/18/2007 9:59:09 AM PDT by brookwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: magoo70804
Bush should appoint Paul Volker or John Bolton.

Bolton would be perfect.

They would wish they had Wolfowitz back.

12 posted on 05/18/2007 10:02:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Why would we want Tony Blair spending our money?

13 posted on 05/18/2007 10:02:45 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brookwood

Still doesn’t make it right. Besides, HRK didn’t get paid with taxpayer money. I believe that her efforts were not compensated.

The point is that there are many despicable things done by Democats everyday. That is why we are better. “What the democrats did” should never be allowed to justify our actions. otherwise we will become like them.

14 posted on 05/18/2007 2:37:05 PM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson