Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Dobson on Mitt Romney
The Brody File ^ | May 21, 2007 | David Brody

Posted on 05/21/2007 11:48:40 AM PDT by TexanSniper

A few days ago on the Laura Ingram radio show, Focus on the Family founder James Dobson said he's not voting for John Mccain or Rudy Giuliani. No surprise there. But then he talked about Mitt Romney and his comments were pretty positive. Click here to listen. The transccript is below. 

 

Ingraham: Any thoughts on Romney? Any other thoughts on Romney? He is now winning in Iowa and looks like he is winning in some polls in New Hampshire.
 
Dr. Dobson: Since I talked to you I have spent an hour and a half with him and I liked him. I mean he is very presidential and he has got the right answers to many, many things. I haven’t made a decision yet, but lets just say he is still on the list.

 

 
Would James Dobson, one of the most well known and more importantly popular evangelical leaders come out and support Mitt Romney for President? If he did, do you understand the implication of that? As it relates to the Mormonism issue, his endorsement would give millions of evangelicals "cover" to vote for Romney. You would hear the line, "Well, if he's good enough for Dr. Dobson, he's good enough for me." 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; fred; fredthompson; mitt; prolife; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: Neville72
So we voted against a Massachusetts flip-flopper in ‘04 so we could vote in a Massachusetts flip-flopper in ‘08?

So we voted against a French-speaking head of hair in '04 so we could vote in a French-speaking head of hair in '08?

21 posted on 05/21/2007 12:08:54 PM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

I think if Fred doesn’t run, I will be on the Mitt bandwagon. But, I think Fred will run, and will be the next President.


22 posted on 05/21/2007 12:09:21 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler
Hey, I’m as much of a Fred-head as the next guy, but I think it’s time we begin to think about Plan B. What if Fred doesn’t run, or the Hitlery-Hit machine digs up something on Fred that takes him out of the race?

Then we're screwed.

Hillary beats a RINO. Simple as that.

23 posted on 05/21/2007 12:10:25 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TexanSniper

I don’t need ‘Doctor Dobson’ to tell me how to vote.


24 posted on 05/21/2007 12:10:58 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
I think if Fred doesn’t run, I will be on the Mitt bandwagon. But, I think Fred will run, and will be the next President.

I'm right there with ya SoDak.

25 posted on 05/21/2007 12:10:59 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fence first! We can discuss the rest later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexanSniper

I don’t need anyone’s endorsement to give me “cover” to vote for Romney or anyone else.

In general I like Romney. He’s not my first pick, but if he’s the nominee, I’d vote for him proudly, he is head and shoulders above anything on the Dem side of the line, he agrees with me on most things, he’s clearly intelligent and clearly an adult.

I prefer Hunter, and Thompson, and Tancredo is growing on me, I’m looking for someone bold who can take a pounding. I want someone less willing to compromise than, say, Bush has been. I love the guy, but I’ve had enough of the “kinder-gentler” conservatism, I want the uncut version. Romney strikes me as a conservative in the “lets all work together” Bush tradition. I’m sure there’s a place for that, and if it comes to Romney, then fine. As I say, though, he’s not my first pick.


26 posted on 05/21/2007 12:11:19 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

I’m actually coming to believe that romney has no closely held values.

He governed Massacusetts as a RINO and many say “how else could he have gotten elected in the most liberal state.

I say if he is or ever was an authentic conservative, he couldn’t have gotten elected in Taxachusetts. So he flipped to a become a quasi-liberal to win a governorship and then flopped to become a presidential candidate.

In other words, he’s a nothing. An empty vessel willing to be filled by whatever political cocktail he thinks will allow him to run his next race.

He’s not an authentic anything and that’s pathetic.


27 posted on 05/21/2007 12:15:48 PM PDT by Neville72 (uist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
“What if Fred doesn’t run,”

Bets please.

I agree, the chances that he doesn't run seem to get slimmer by the day, but until he announces, he ain't in the race, is he?

or the Hitlery-Hit machine digs up something on Fred that takes him out of the race?

And what might that be? Can you spill the beans or are you just constructing strawmen, Mittboy.

Underestimate the power of the Klintoon slime machine at your own peril.

28 posted on 05/21/2007 12:18:44 PM PDT by ssaftler (BDS - Coming to a DemonRat near you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TexanSniper

Dobson: Keep your thinking cap on!


29 posted on 05/21/2007 12:19:23 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanSniper

Glad to hear this from Dobson.

I’m a conservative Born-Again Christian but I could easily vote for Romney just because of where he stands on the issues.


30 posted on 05/21/2007 12:25:01 PM PDT by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanSniper

I bet a lot of evangelical and conservative Christians have been waiting on the sidelines. In Iowa, about 1/4 of the Republican caucus voters usually side with some openly Christian candidate. Pat Robertson got 23% in ‘88 and Gary Bauer and Alan Keyes got a combined 23% in ‘00. I bet Romney will continue to surge.


31 posted on 05/21/2007 12:26:36 PM PDT by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanSniper
As it relates to the Mormonism issue, his endorsement would give millions of evangelicals "cover" to vote for Romney.

What makes Mr Brody think there are "millions of evagelicals" who need such "cover" to vote for a morman?

32 posted on 05/21/2007 12:29:55 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Especially since it’s unconstitutional.

If the feds enforced such a religious test it would be.

But please don't confuse that with the current issue. There is certainly no Constitutional restriction on what issues a voter uses to make up his mind.

33 posted on 05/21/2007 12:35:10 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08

I like the idea of a Thompson/Romney or Romney/Thompson ticket. Unfortunately, Thompson’s not willing to be VP and Romney’s exceeds when he’s in the leadership role, so I don’t think it will ever happen.


34 posted on 05/21/2007 12:35:19 PM PDT by VegasBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VegasBaby

Agreed.


35 posted on 05/21/2007 12:35:45 PM PDT by Obadiah (I’m always relieved when someone is delivering a eulogy and I realize I’m listening to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tabsternager
You might like this link Evangelicals for Mitt

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

36 posted on 05/21/2007 12:52:16 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
We all need to remember that Romney is running for President - not to be anyone’s pastor or minister. You certainly don’t have to agree with or believe a person’s religion to vote for them for political office. Even if you don’t like Romney’s religion you at least need to consider that he is a believer in Christian values and is a faithful family man. Would you rather see Hitlery elected? The only thing she values is her own personal power and ambition!!
37 posted on 05/21/2007 12:53:45 PM PDT by POWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexanSniper

I’m willing to believe that Romney’s had a change of heart on the issues, particularly abortion. To me, his explanation seems plausible. As I’ve taken more and more advanced biology classes I’ve become more adamantly pro-life. His route of study on the cloning and embryo issues probably paralleled my studies at school, and knowledge only made my beliefs that much stronger.

Instinctively, it seems obvious that a woman should have a right to choose what to do with her own body. But that requires objectifying a fetus as a woman’s property to do with as she pleases, and removing any of the personal responsibility of getting pregnant from her... But a fetus IS a seperate, if dependent, human life. If Romney now believes that, I am willing to take him at his word.


38 posted on 05/21/2007 12:56:45 PM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
"And what might that be? Can you spill the beans or are you just constructing strawmen"

I don't mean to trash or criticize Fred Thompson but did you know that he once played a white supremacist for a TV show? I know he was just acting and it doesn't mean anything but you know how the MSM works. This is how they will portray it. George Allen was destroyed for much less. I know it's unfair and I like Fred but we have to be realistic.

39 posted on 05/21/2007 12:59:35 PM PDT by TexanSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Neville72

Romney governed as a conservative while Governor. He had a very liberal legislature that he fought against for four years.

His problem was when he campaigned against Kennedy for the Senate. He took some liberal social stances that he has since changed on. You can call it unprincipled, but remember Ronald Reagan was once a Democrat.


40 posted on 05/21/2007 1:13:49 PM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson