Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Why by golly you’re in luck- plenty of that will turn up with even just a cursory look on the net. Design is absolutely falsifiable, problem is, design rears it’s overwhelming head in too many places, as does irreducible complexity. Happy hunting.

Translation: "No, I don't have any, so I'll point them at Google."

26 posted on 05/24/2007 11:45:59 AM PDT by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: blowfish; qam1

http://www.uncommondescent.com/

http://www.designinference.com/

oh I’ve got plenty- but I’ll refrain from listing them- I enjoy the ‘you didn’t give links so they don’t exist’ accusations. That second link by the way has more science than you can shake a stick at- but I’m sure you’ll get all tripped up over the fact that he mentions God a few times- but I assure you, focusing in on a few statements like a laser won’t undo the fact that his science is sound! Of course, you’ll no doubt join along with the critics fearful of his science and engage in the time honored tradition of ignoring the science and attacking the character.

post 25: [Looks like the mythology over science crowd are the losers]

Nope- the mythology won hands down. Biological impossibilities? Pfffff, who needs to learn about those in a ‘science’ (and I use the term VERY loosly) class? Better for a biased judge and panel to deny the teaching of science that points out htese facts- Better for an agenda driven judge to stick fingers in ears, sing ‘la la la ID contains no science’ than for the judge to actually concider the fact that his precious religion has some SERIOUS scientific problems that needs addressing. Don’t like the coutner evidences? Then by golly just make childish ad hominem attacks on the opposition and deny them the right to teach SCIENCE in it’s entirety. Better to take the imature stance that Dawkins takes and state “if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I’d rather not consider that).”

Yeehaw, now there’s a purely scientific statement right htere brother!


27 posted on 05/24/2007 12:00:33 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson