no need for students to be exposed to learned objections to the religion of evolution!
Sure there is, but here's the catch, 1st you must actually come up with one.
And no claiming, "I can't or won't see how xxxx could evolve therefore it must be Jesus" doesn't cut it.
I thought space aliens did it. I know I’ve seen someone here recently quoting Francis Crick.
[And no claiming, “I can’t or won’t see how xxxx could evolve therefore it must be Jesus” doesn’t cut it.]
Who’s saying that? Wow- you’re batting a thousand in the credibility department- Noone I know of says that- not even close We state “Evolution has serious SCIENTIFIC problems and tada- here they are-”
[Sure there is, but here’s the catch, 1st you must actually come up with one.]
Mission accomplished- so what’s your problem? I mean, other than a blind bias and a genralized non supported denial and accusations based on unlerned agenda driven dogmatism?
Lie? I get the Kan\sas issue mixed yp with hte Dover trial/sham and I’m lying? Lol- Ok. And NO- one of hte reasons they lost was flat out bias and fear of science proper!!! But butter it however you like- your side always does!
And how’sa your rebuttles to the SCIENCE I linked to going? Too busy making gneralized silly accusations about ID to take the time to eductate yourself on the issue?