Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Novel sugar-to-hydrogen technology promises transportation fuel independence
Virginia Tech News ^ | 5/23/06 | Susan Trulove

Posted on 05/25/2007 9:24:25 AM PDT by HangnJudge

snip. Researchers at Virginia Tech, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the University of Georgia propose using polysaccharides, or sugary carbohydrates, from biomass to directly produce low-cost hydrogen for the new hydrogen economy.

snip. Using synthetic biology approaches, Zhang and colleagues Barbara R. Evans and Jonathan R. Mielenz of ORNL, and Robert C. Hopkins and Michael W.W. Adams of the University of Georgia, are using a combination of 13 enzymes never found together in nature to completely convert polysaccharides (C6H10O5) and water into hydrogen when and where that form of energy is needed. This “synthetic enzymatic pathway” research appears in the May 23 issue of PLoS ONE, the online, open-access journal from the Public Library of Science.
snip. The vision is for the ingredients to be mixed in the fuel tank of your car, for instance. A car with an approximately 12-gallon tank could hold 27 kilograms (kg) of starch, which is the equivalent of 4 kg of hydrogen. The range would be more than 300 miles, Zhang estimates. One kg of starch will produce the same energy output as 1.12 kg (0.38 gallons) of gasoline

snip. So it is environmentally friendly, energy efficient, requires no special infrastructure, and is extremely safe. We have killed three birds with one stone,” he said. “We have hydrogen production with a mild reaction and low cost. We have hydrogen storage and transport in the form of starch or syrups. And no special infrastructure is needed

(Excerpt) Read more at vtnews.vt.edu ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; fuel; hydrogen; sugar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
Getting Closer....
Any process to stop the flow of money into the Islamists is OK with me
1 posted on 05/25/2007 9:24:26 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

Dang...there goes the price of sugar now...


2 posted on 05/25/2007 9:28:22 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

I’m with you on that, btw. I was just being facetious...


3 posted on 05/25/2007 9:29:10 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

So this means you drive around with some syrup in your tank, converting it to hydrogen as needed, rather than driving around with a big tank of hydrogen ready to explode? Sounds good.

Then you need another tank to convert cellulose into glucose and things will really be good - organic cars powered by termites and bacteria.

Mrs VS


4 posted on 05/25/2007 9:29:48 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

Now’s the time to go long on Dairy Queen stock?


5 posted on 05/25/2007 9:32:07 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Then you need another tank to convert cellulose into glucose and things will really be good - organic cars powered by termites and bacteria.

This is being worked on. I know personally some people burning the midnight oil on this.
6 posted on 05/25/2007 9:32:45 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor

Who would have ever thoght sugar in the gas tank was a good thing?


7 posted on 05/25/2007 9:33:19 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge
One kg of starch will produce the same energy output as 1.12 kg (0.38 gallons) of gasoline

This is the important line. You don't want to carry around 20 pounds of stuff to get the effect of 1 pound of gasoline. The next hurdle to clear will be how this compares to gas when measured in terms of energy output per dollar. My guess is that gas is still much cheaper; but, as the price of this system comes down, and the price of gas goes up, that threshold will be crossed quickly enough.

8 posted on 05/25/2007 9:33:40 AM PDT by Redcloak (The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

Well that certainly takes all the fun out of pouring sugar in someone’s gas tank...


9 posted on 05/25/2007 9:33:46 AM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

We aren’t any closer to partial, much less complete hydrogen usage than we were ten years ago, however, I am in complete agreement, that massive drilling everywhere there is oil within our territory, building of refineries, and nuclear power production should be first and foremost on any list that has even a particle of chance to stop the terrorist money flood to our sworn enemies.


10 posted on 05/25/2007 9:34:37 AM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

11 posted on 05/25/2007 9:34:39 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

This would be cool if it ever makes it to market.


12 posted on 05/25/2007 9:36:32 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Dang...there goes the price of sugar now...

Hmmmm... who makes Domino Sugar?
13 posted on 05/25/2007 9:39:27 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

The Democrats will destroy the food supply of this country in the name of saving the environment.


14 posted on 05/25/2007 9:41:41 AM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Food is the new fuel, and not just for the human body.


15 posted on 05/25/2007 9:42:51 AM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge
I see a lot of carbon and oxygen as a byproduct here, what kind of soupy, gloopy mess is going to be left in the tank after everything is “digested” and needs to be removed?
16 posted on 05/25/2007 9:42:53 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita
We aren’t any closer to partial, much less complete hydrogen usage than we were ten years ago

However, Iceland is making a go of it, with their nearly unlimited geothermal energy resources

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/archive/2208013.stm

17 posted on 05/25/2007 9:43:30 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

South Florida is a mecca for sugar.
It is more subsidized then any crop.
To harvest it they light the entire field on fire choking the air for as far as you can’t see.
Then the burned ashes flow into your water both above and below ground.
Then take into account the phosphates they use to fertalize it and I just can’t see it as the panacea.
What I can’t figure out is how they get away with it other then the f-ing e.p.a. isn’t doing their job.


18 posted on 05/25/2007 9:43:30 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

ping


19 posted on 05/25/2007 9:44:24 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge
We are arming our enemies via a disgraceful energy policy. Putting those SOBS back in tents and back on camels and making them inconsequential (save for when they do something Really Dumb (TM)) should be the new Manhattan project. No further good will ever come from that part of the world.

The environment bs garbage may be helpful for getting the useful idiots to be useful for the right side for once.

20 posted on 05/25/2007 9:44:26 AM PDT by M203M4 (What I wanna see is a pro-war ("kill the bastards") Ron Paul. Pacifism is suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson